You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Julian Hyde (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/02/01 23:29:34 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-583) Operator `||` mishandled ANY type
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14300769#comment-14300769 ]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-583:
-------------------------------------
Can you add a test case to SqlOperatorBaseTest?
> Operator `||` mishandled ANY type
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-583
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-583
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sean Hsuan-Yi Chu
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Fix For: next
>
> Attachments: CALCITE-583.1.patch
>
>
> For instance,
> select ANY type || ANY type ... leads assertion error from:
> assert (precision >= 0) || (precision == RelDataType.PRECISION_NOT_SPECIFIED);
> (SqlTypeFactoryImpl.java( line: 62))
> Essentially, it is because, SqlReturnTypeInference of `||` is DYADIC_STRING_SUM_PRECISION. When doing inference for the return type, there is one data field in DYADIC_STRING_SUM_PRECISION called "precision", which is calculated as arg0.precison + arg1.precision.
> However, for ANY type, the precision is defined as -1. So the above calculation will give "-2" for ANY type operands, in turn, breaking up the assertion.
> Moreover, `||` can fail when the two operands have different types (e.g., ANY type || String). In the No schema system, ANY type can be quite prevalent. For example, select ANY type || string || ANY type ... where, in addition to two ANY types on two sides, we have a string in between.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)