Re: [VOTE] Migrate ArchetypeNG to Apache & commit privs for Raphael

[Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>]

Ok, we already really had a passing vote to bring this over here that  
was sat on due to the controversy raised, so I haven't changed my  
vote there:

+1 to ArchetypeNG coming in

(Please make sure an IP clearance form is submitted for the code).

I already believe Raphaël has demonstrated enough merit through his  
contributions to the list(s), efforts on Archetype, and general  
persistence with this, so:

+1 to Raphaël as a committer

I'm interested to know if anyone else is having success with the  
current code, though, given the number of +1's. I couldn't get it to  
run at all - after 5 attempts and fixes I'd need to code read to get  
any further. Not a blocker to bringing it across, though - as I've  
said before I'd rather work through those kind of issues here. I'll  
start a new thread to catalogue them for now and we can push anything  
left over into JIRA once the code moves over. Just to be clear that I  
expect there'll still be plenty of work to do before the first  
release of this can go out.

- Brett

On 30/06/2007, at 11:48 AM, Brett Porter wrote:

> Raphael already has a CLA on file, so there's no rush.
>
> I'll take another look on Monday and vote then, I have other things  
> to do this weekend.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 30/06/2007, at 12:40 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> Great, that's 4 PMC members already so people can continue to  
>> comment but I'll get Raphael to send in a CLA, and adjust the code  
>> for Apache.
>>
>> On 28 Jun 07, at 11:28 PM 28 Jun 07, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> After a fews weeks of sorting out some niggly details the new  
>>> code new by default will produce a functional archetype without  
>>> user intervention, and projects can be generated with the old and  
>>> new archetype plugins. I asked that Raphael make some additions  
>>> which generate the old and new descriptors so that anyone who had  
>>> nailed down versions of their plugins by turning off updates will  
>>> still be able to use new archetypes with the plugin they have on  
>>> hand. You can still optionally enter interactive mode and the  
>>> code is working well from the users perspective. The code can be  
>>> refactored incrementally but will be a big improvement for users.  
>>> I think Raphael has done a very good job and I think it's now  
>>> ready to bring over here. I've been using the code for the last  
>>> week trying it out with a Maven integration test archetype and  
>>> it's working well.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>> Jason van Zyl
>>> Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
>>> jason at sonatype dot com
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> Jason van Zyl
>> Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
>> jason at sonatype dot com
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Migrate ArchetypeNG to Apache & commit privs for Raphael

[Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org>]

On 2 Jul 07, at 12:57 AM 2 Jul 07, Brett Porter wrote:

>
> On 02/07/2007, at 4:54 PM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
>
>> Please add some jira and assign them to me.
>> I will only have time for this after the 15/07
>> (after holidays)
>
> Bit too much to get in there just now - we don't need to rush that  
> part, I just wanted to make sure they were known.
>
> Most important thing is to do the licensing/packaging and get it  
> imported (which I guess Jason is taking the lead on).
>

Yup, it all builds and I've been running it for a couple weeks now  
and I have no problem taking responsibility for the code migration as  
a whole.

> Enjoy your holidays :)
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Migrate ArchetypeNG to Apache & commit privs for Raphael

[Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>]

On 02/07/2007, at 4:54 PM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:

> Please add some jira and assign them to me.
> I will only have time for this after the 15/07
> (after holidays)

Bit too much to get in there just now - we don't need to rush that  
part, I just wanted to make sure they were known.

Most important thing is to do the licensing/packaging and get it  
imported (which I guess Jason is taking the lead on).

Enjoy your holidays :)

Cheers,
Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Migrate ArchetypeNG to Apache & commit privs for Raphael

[Raphaël Piéroni <ra...@gmail.com>]

2007/7/2, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>:
>
>
> I'm interested to know if anyone else is having success with the
> current code, though, given the number of +1's. I couldn't get it to
> run at all - after 5 attempts and fixes I'd need to code read to get
> any further. Not a blocker to bringing it across, though - as I've
> said before I'd rather work through those kind of issues here. I'll
> start a new thread to catalogue them for now and we can push anything
> left over into JIRA once the code moves over.


Please add some jira and assign them to me.
I will only have time for this after the 15/07
(after holidays)


Just to be clear that I
> expect there'll still be plenty of work to do before the first
> release of this can go out.


There is the user documentation that is not accurate (least i can say ;-) )
The codebase is ugly
The codebase is not well documented

Regards,

Raphaël