Re: svn commit: r388911 - TEXT_COMPOUND_DELIMITER

[th...@kodak.com]

Hi all,

   I am curious to hear how/if people are using TEXT_COMPOUND_DELIMITER.

   The solution I committed is maximally backwards compatible but has some 
ugliness
to it.  My proffered solution would be to remove TEXT_COMPOUND_DELIMITER
completely and instead use TEXT_COMPOUND_ID as a soft reference to the 
Element. 

   This would clean up the code a bit and make the behavior a little less 
modal than
it currently is.  Would this be a significant problem for anyone?

deweese@apache.org wrote on 03/26/2006 09:40:51 AM:

> 2) In most places TEXT_COMPOUND_DELIMITER has effectively been
>    replaced by TEXT_COMPOUND_ID.  TEXT_COMPOUND_ID has a unique
>    value for each element in the DOM but retains no reference to
>    the element.
> 
>    In dynamic documents TEXT_COMPOUND_DELIMITER is still bound on
>    elements, with a hard reference to the DOM element.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org