You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2013/11/10 19:35:42 UTC
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Hi all,
We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
pending Jira).
If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>
> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>
> So, today, I will:
> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>
> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
> release.
>
> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Do you have some test scenarions? I see, you test only on Linux x86. I
use 64bit Ubuntu. I could perform some tests. I'd only like to know
what do you usually test.
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 10.11.2013 19:35, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>
> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>
> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>
> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>
> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
> pending Jira).
>
> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>
>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>
>> So, today, I will:
>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>
>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>> release.
>>
>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
I checked in xbean-asm4-shaded but missed the package.
- target/classes/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (generated by maven-bundle-plugin)
is not good
- but the MANIFEST.MF in the jar looks good.
I checked in Karaf deploying the bundle:
karaf@root()> la -l|grep -i xbean-asm4-shaded
[ 110] [ Active] [ 20] mvn:org.apache.xbean/xbean-asm4-shaded/3.15
karaf@root()> bundle:headers 110
...
Import-Package =
org.apache.xbean.asm4;version=4.1,
org.apache.xbean.asm4.signature;version=4.1,
org.apache.xbean.asm4.commons;version=4.1,
org.apache.xbean.asm4.tree;version=4.1
Export-Package =
org.apache.xbean.asm4;version=4.1,
org.apache.xbean.asm4.signature;version=4.1,
org.apache.xbean.asm4.commons;version=4.1,
org.apache.xbean.asm4.tree;version=4.1
I created a Jira at XBean this morning, but deleted it. I reopen it to
fix that.
Regards
JB
On 11/13/2013 01:19 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> Sorry but the xbean-asm-shaded doesn't export the required Package.
>
> taken from the pom available at search.maven.org:
>
> <properties>
>
> <xbean.osgi.export>org.apache.xbean.asm;version=3.2,org.apache.xbean.asm.signature;version=3.2,org.apache.xbean.asm.commons;version=3.2,org.apache.xbean.asm.tree;version=3.2</xbean.osgi.export>
> </properties>
>
> Regards, Achim
>
>
>
> 2013/11/13 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>
>> I checked and xbean-asm4-shaded is fine. I make a try by updating the
>> features descriptor to use xbean-finder-shaded (instead of the
>> xbean-finder).
>>
>> If it works, we don't need a new xbean release.
>> I keep you posted.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 11/13/2013 07:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> In the same area, I gonna submit a patch at XBean and "push" for a new
>>> 3.16 release to fix issue on xbean-asm4-shaded (it doesn't export the
>>> org.apache.xbean.asm4.shade.commons package whereas it's imported by
>>> xbean-finder-shaded).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 11/13/2013 07:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I missed one thing in the preparation of the Karaf 3.0.0 release: it's
>>>> the dependency to ServiceMix Specs 2.3.0.
>>>>
>>>> Currently, trunk (and 2.x and 2.3.x branches) uses ServiceMix Specs
>>>> 2.3-SNAPSHOT.
>>>>
>>>> I'm preparing the ServiceMix Specs release 2.3.0 now and I will submit
>>>> to vote this morning.
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully, we can expect a release (if the vote passed) and artifacts on
>>>> Central for next Saturday morning.
>>>>
>>>> I have to postpone the Karaf 3.0.0 release after the ServiceMix Specs
>>>> release. I think it's better as I saw a couple of issues that I gonna
>>>> fix.
>>>>
>>>> So, we can re-schedule Karaf 3.0.0 vote for Tuesday, 19th November.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry about that guys.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>>>
>>>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>>>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>>>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>>>>> pending Jira).
>>>>>
>>>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Sorry but the xbean-asm-shaded doesn't export the required Package.
taken from the pom available at search.maven.org:
<properties>
<xbean.osgi.export>org.apache.xbean.asm;version=3.2,org.apache.xbean.asm.signature;version=3.2,org.apache.xbean.asm.commons;version=3.2,org.apache.xbean.asm.tree;version=3.2</xbean.osgi.export>
</properties>
Regards, Achim
2013/11/13 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> I checked and xbean-asm4-shaded is fine. I make a try by updating the
> features descriptor to use xbean-finder-shaded (instead of the
> xbean-finder).
>
> If it works, we don't need a new xbean release.
> I keep you posted.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 11/13/2013 07:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> In the same area, I gonna submit a patch at XBean and "push" for a new
>> 3.16 release to fix issue on xbean-asm4-shaded (it doesn't export the
>> org.apache.xbean.asm4.shade.commons package whereas it's imported by
>> xbean-finder-shaded).
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 11/13/2013 07:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I missed one thing in the preparation of the Karaf 3.0.0 release: it's
>>> the dependency to ServiceMix Specs 2.3.0.
>>>
>>> Currently, trunk (and 2.x and 2.3.x branches) uses ServiceMix Specs
>>> 2.3-SNAPSHOT.
>>>
>>> I'm preparing the ServiceMix Specs release 2.3.0 now and I will submit
>>> to vote this morning.
>>>
>>> Hopefully, we can expect a release (if the vote passed) and artifacts on
>>> Central for next Saturday morning.
>>>
>>> I have to postpone the Karaf 3.0.0 release after the ServiceMix Specs
>>> release. I think it's better as I saw a couple of issues that I gonna
>>> fix.
>>>
>>> So, we can re-schedule Karaf 3.0.0 vote for Tuesday, 19th November.
>>>
>>> Sorry about that guys.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>
>>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>>
>>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>>
>>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>>>> pending Jira).
>>>>
>>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>>
>>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>>>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
Commiter & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
I checked and xbean-asm4-shaded is fine. I make a try by updating the
features descriptor to use xbean-finder-shaded (instead of the
xbean-finder).
If it works, we don't need a new xbean release.
I keep you posted.
Regards
JB
On 11/13/2013 07:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> In the same area, I gonna submit a patch at XBean and "push" for a new
> 3.16 release to fix issue on xbean-asm4-shaded (it doesn't export the
> org.apache.xbean.asm4.shade.commons package whereas it's imported by
> xbean-finder-shaded).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/13/2013 07:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I missed one thing in the preparation of the Karaf 3.0.0 release: it's
>> the dependency to ServiceMix Specs 2.3.0.
>>
>> Currently, trunk (and 2.x and 2.3.x branches) uses ServiceMix Specs
>> 2.3-SNAPSHOT.
>>
>> I'm preparing the ServiceMix Specs release 2.3.0 now and I will submit
>> to vote this morning.
>>
>> Hopefully, we can expect a release (if the vote passed) and artifacts on
>> Central for next Saturday morning.
>>
>> I have to postpone the Karaf 3.0.0 release after the ServiceMix Specs
>> release. I think it's better as I saw a couple of issues that I gonna
>> fix.
>>
>> So, we can re-schedule Karaf 3.0.0 vote for Tuesday, 19th November.
>>
>> Sorry about that guys.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>
>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>
>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>
>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>
>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>>> pending Jira).
>>>
>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>
>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>
>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Ha,
you beat me again, was just about to "complain" about this issue ;)
regards, Achim
2013/11/13 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> In the same area, I gonna submit a patch at XBean and "push" for a new
> 3.16 release to fix issue on xbean-asm4-shaded (it doesn't export the
> org.apache.xbean.asm4.shade.commons package whereas it's imported by
> xbean-finder-shaded).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 11/13/2013 07:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I missed one thing in the preparation of the Karaf 3.0.0 release: it's
>> the dependency to ServiceMix Specs 2.3.0.
>>
>> Currently, trunk (and 2.x and 2.3.x branches) uses ServiceMix Specs
>> 2.3-SNAPSHOT.
>>
>> I'm preparing the ServiceMix Specs release 2.3.0 now and I will submit
>> to vote this morning.
>>
>> Hopefully, we can expect a release (if the vote passed) and artifacts on
>> Central for next Saturday morning.
>>
>> I have to postpone the Karaf 3.0.0 release after the ServiceMix Specs
>> release. I think it's better as I saw a couple of issues that I gonna fix.
>>
>> So, we can re-schedule Karaf 3.0.0 vote for Tuesday, 19th November.
>>
>> Sorry about that guys.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>
>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>
>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>
>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>
>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>>> pending Jira).
>>>
>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>
>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>
>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
Commiter & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
In the same area, I gonna submit a patch at XBean and "push" for a new
3.16 release to fix issue on xbean-asm4-shaded (it doesn't export the
org.apache.xbean.asm4.shade.commons package whereas it's imported by
xbean-finder-shaded).
Regards
JB
On 11/13/2013 07:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I missed one thing in the preparation of the Karaf 3.0.0 release: it's
> the dependency to ServiceMix Specs 2.3.0.
>
> Currently, trunk (and 2.x and 2.3.x branches) uses ServiceMix Specs
> 2.3-SNAPSHOT.
>
> I'm preparing the ServiceMix Specs release 2.3.0 now and I will submit
> to vote this morning.
>
> Hopefully, we can expect a release (if the vote passed) and artifacts on
> Central for next Saturday morning.
>
> I have to postpone the Karaf 3.0.0 release after the ServiceMix Specs
> release. I think it's better as I saw a couple of issues that I gonna fix.
>
> So, we can re-schedule Karaf 3.0.0 vote for Tuesday, 19th November.
>
> Sorry about that guys.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>
>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>
>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>
>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>
>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>> pending Jira).
>>
>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>
>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>
>>> So, today, I will:
>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>
>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>> release.
>>>
>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi all,
I missed one thing in the preparation of the Karaf 3.0.0 release: it's
the dependency to ServiceMix Specs 2.3.0.
Currently, trunk (and 2.x and 2.3.x branches) uses ServiceMix Specs
2.3-SNAPSHOT.
I'm preparing the ServiceMix Specs release 2.3.0 now and I will submit
to vote this morning.
Hopefully, we can expect a release (if the vote passed) and artifacts on
Central for next Saturday morning.
I have to postpone the Karaf 3.0.0 release after the ServiceMix Specs
release. I think it's better as I saw a couple of issues that I gonna fix.
So, we can re-schedule Karaf 3.0.0 vote for Tuesday, 19th November.
Sorry about that guys.
Regards
JB
On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>
> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>
> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>
> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>
> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
> pending Jira).
>
> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>
>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>
>> So, today, I will:
>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>
>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>> release.
>>
>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Awesome, thanks a lot Freeman.
I'm testing it now and move forward on the other Jiras.
Regards
JB
On 11/11/2013 03:25 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
> Hi JB,
>
> Fixed.
>
> Thanks
> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
> Twitter: freemanfang
> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>
>
>
> On 2013-11-11, at 上午2:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> @Freeman: it seems that the latest changes on log:tail (with the introduction on a dedicated thread to avoid "interference" from some binding keys) provide an issue: the CPU is used at 100% during the log:tail execution (due to fast looping).
>> Karaf 2.3.x is affected but also Karaf 3.0.0.
>>
>> If you have some time to fix that, else I will do it tomorrow.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>
>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>
>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>
>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>
>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>>> pending Jira).
>>>
>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>
>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>
>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Agree.
On 11/11/2013 08:59 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> just a little note.
> I just found that we do have an issue with Java 8,
> Karaf 3.0 won't run nor build with Java 8 right now.
> This is due to an issue with ASM, it looks a lot like
> ASM 4.x isn't compatible with Java 8.
> ASM 5.0-BETA is available right now and seems to fix this.
>
> We should mark this as a known Issue for Karaf 3.0
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
>
>
> 2013/11/11 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>
>> Thanks Freeman !!
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 11/11/2013 08:44 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, Done!
>>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>>
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>>> Twitter: freemanfang
>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2013-11-11, at 下午3:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, it's what I thought.
>>>>
>>>> I would propose to decrease the sleep time (let say 200ms).
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 11/11/2013 08:02 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi JB,
>>>>>
>>>>> No, that's not same issue. Now the "CTRL-C" for log:tail could be catch
>>>>> after 500ms sleep, during this sleep interval, the log:tail could still
>>>>> output, but the "CTRL-C" will take effect after the 500ms sleep. We can
>>>>> consider use a lower sleep time to make the "CTRL-C" take effect sooner.
>>>>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>>>>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>>>>
>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>>>>> Twitter: freemanfang
>>>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>>>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>>>>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2013-11-11, at 下午2:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I just tried your fix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like we reintroduce the same issue as before: when executed
>>>>>> log:tail once, the log messages are display on System.out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I reopen the Jira to take a look on that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/11/2013 03:25 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi JB,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>>>>>>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>>>>>>> Twitter: freemanfang
>>>>>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>>>>>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>>>>>>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2013-11-11, at 上午2:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Freeman: it seems that the latest changes on log:tail (with the
>>>>>>>> introduction on a dedicated thread to avoid "interference" from some
>>>>>>>> binding keys) provide an issue: the CPU is used at 100% during the log:tail
>>>>>>>> execution (due to fast looping).
>>>>>>>> Karaf 2.3.x is affected but also Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you have some time to fix that, else I will do it tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on
>>>>>>>>> x86),
>>>>>>>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and
>>>>>>>>> 8,
>>>>>>>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> pending Jira).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>>>>>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>>>>>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>>>>>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the
>>>>>>>>>> 3.0.0
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it
>>>>>>>>>> gives
>>>>>>>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Hi guys,
just a little note.
I just found that we do have an issue with Java 8,
Karaf 3.0 won't run nor build with Java 8 right now.
This is due to an issue with ASM, it looks a lot like
ASM 4.x isn't compatible with Java 8.
ASM 5.0-BETA is available right now and seems to fix this.
We should mark this as a known Issue for Karaf 3.0
regards, Achim
2013/11/11 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> Thanks Freeman !!
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 11/11/2013 08:44 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>
>> Yep, Done!
>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>> Twitter: freemanfang
>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2013-11-11, at 下午3:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>> Yes, it's what I thought.
>>>
>>> I would propose to decrease the sleep time (let say 200ms).
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 11/11/2013 08:02 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi JB,
>>>>
>>>> No, that's not same issue. Now the "CTRL-C" for log:tail could be catch
>>>> after 500ms sleep, during this sleep interval, the log:tail could still
>>>> output, but the "CTRL-C" will take effect after the 500ms sleep. We can
>>>> consider use a lower sleep time to make the "CTRL-C" take effect sooner.
>>>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>>>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>>>
>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>>>> Twitter: freemanfang
>>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>>>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2013-11-11, at 下午2:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just tried your fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like we reintroduce the same issue as before: when executed
>>>>> log:tail once, the log messages are display on System.out.
>>>>>
>>>>> I reopen the Jira to take a look on that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/11/2013 03:25 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi JB,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>>>>>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>>>>>> Twitter: freemanfang
>>>>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>>>>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>>>>>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2013-11-11, at 上午2:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Freeman: it seems that the latest changes on log:tail (with the
>>>>>>> introduction on a dedicated thread to avoid "interference" from some
>>>>>>> binding keys) provide an issue: the CPU is used at 100% during the log:tail
>>>>>>> execution (due to fast looping).
>>>>>>> Karaf 2.3.x is affected but also Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you have some time to fix that, else I will do it tomorrow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on
>>>>>>>> x86),
>>>>>>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and
>>>>>>>> 8,
>>>>>>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> pending Jira).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>>>>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>>>>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>>>>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the
>>>>>>>>> 3.0.0
>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it
>>>>>>>>> gives
>>>>>>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
Commiter & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Thanks Freeman !!
Regards
JB
On 11/11/2013 08:44 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
> Yep, Done!
> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
> Twitter: freemanfang
> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>
>
>
> On 2013-11-11, at 下午3:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> Yes, it's what I thought.
>>
>> I would propose to decrease the sleep time (let say 200ms).
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 11/11/2013 08:02 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>>> Hi JB,
>>>
>>> No, that's not same issue. Now the "CTRL-C" for log:tail could be catch after 500ms sleep, during this sleep interval, the log:tail could still output, but the "CTRL-C" will take effect after the 500ms sleep. We can consider use a lower sleep time to make the "CTRL-C" take effect sooner.
>>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>>
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>>> Twitter: freemanfang
>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2013-11-11, at 下午2:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just tried your fix.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like we reintroduce the same issue as before: when executed log:tail once, the log messages are display on System.out.
>>>>
>>>> I reopen the Jira to take a look on that.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 11/11/2013 03:25 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>>>>> Hi JB,
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>>>>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>>>>
>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>>>>> Twitter: freemanfang
>>>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>>>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>>>>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2013-11-11, at 上午2:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @Freeman: it seems that the latest changes on log:tail (with the introduction on a dedicated thread to avoid "interference" from some binding keys) provide an issue: the CPU is used at 100% during the log:tail execution (due to fast looping).
>>>>>> Karaf 2.3.x is affected but also Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have some time to fix that, else I will do it tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>>>>>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>>>>>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>>>>>>> pending Jira).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>>>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>>>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>>>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>>>>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
Yep, Done!
－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: @Freeman小屋
On 2013-11-11, at 下午3:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Yes, it's what I thought.
>
> I would propose to decrease the sleep time (let say 200ms).
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/11/2013 08:02 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>> Hi JB,
>>
>> No, that's not same issue. Now the "CTRL-C" for log:tail could be catch after 500ms sleep, during this sleep interval, the log:tail could still output, but the "CTRL-C" will take effect after the 500ms sleep. We can consider use a lower sleep time to make the "CTRL-C" take effect sooner.
>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>> Twitter: freemanfang
>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2013-11-11, at 下午2:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> I just tried your fix.
>>>
>>> It looks like we reintroduce the same issue as before: when executed log:tail once, the log messages are display on System.out.
>>>
>>> I reopen the Jira to take a look on that.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 11/11/2013 03:25 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>>>> Hi JB,
>>>>
>>>> Fixed.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>>>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>>>
>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>>>> Twitter: freemanfang
>>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>>>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2013-11-11, at 上午2:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @Freeman: it seems that the latest changes on log:tail (with the introduction on a dedicated thread to avoid "interference" from some binding keys) provide an issue: the CPU is used at 100% during the log:tail execution (due to fast looping).
>>>>> Karaf 2.3.x is affected but also Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have some time to fix that, else I will do it tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>>>>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>>>>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>>>>>> pending Jira).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>>>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Yes, it's what I thought.
I would propose to decrease the sleep time (let say 200ms).
WDYT ?
Regards
JB
On 11/11/2013 08:02 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
> Hi JB,
>
> No, that's not same issue. Now the "CTRL-C" for log:tail could be catch after 500ms sleep, during this sleep interval, the log:tail could still output, but the "CTRL-C" will take effect after the 500ms sleep. We can consider use a lower sleep time to make the "CTRL-C" take effect sooner.
> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
> Twitter: freemanfang
> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>
>
>
> On 2013-11-11, at 下午2:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> I just tried your fix.
>>
>> It looks like we reintroduce the same issue as before: when executed log:tail once, the log messages are display on System.out.
>>
>> I reopen the Jira to take a look on that.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 11/11/2013 03:25 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>>> Hi JB,
>>>
>>> Fixed.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>>
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>>> Twitter: freemanfang
>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2013-11-11, at 上午2:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Freeman: it seems that the latest changes on log:tail (with the introduction on a dedicated thread to avoid "interference" from some binding keys) provide an issue: the CPU is used at 100% during the log:tail execution (due to fast looping).
>>>> Karaf 2.3.x is affected but also Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>
>>>> If you have some time to fix that, else I will do it tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>>>
>>>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>>>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>>>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>>>>> pending Jira).
>>>>>
>>>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
Hi JB,
No, that's not same issue. Now the "CTRL-C" for log:tail could be catch after 500ms sleep, during this sleep interval, the log:tail could still output, but the "CTRL-C" will take effect after the 500ms sleep. We can consider use a lower sleep time to make the "CTRL-C" take effect sooner.
－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: @Freeman小屋
On 2013-11-11, at 下午2:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> I just tried your fix.
>
> It looks like we reintroduce the same issue as before: when executed log:tail once, the log messages are display on System.out.
>
> I reopen the Jira to take a look on that.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/11/2013 03:25 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>> Hi JB,
>>
>> Fixed.
>>
>> Thanks
>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>>
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
>> Twitter: freemanfang
>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2013-11-11, at 上午2:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> @Freeman: it seems that the latest changes on log:tail (with the introduction on a dedicated thread to avoid "interference" from some binding keys) provide an issue: the CPU is used at 100% during the log:tail execution (due to fast looping).
>>> Karaf 2.3.x is affected but also Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>
>>> If you have some time to fix that, else I will do it tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>
>>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>>
>>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>>
>>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>>>> pending Jira).
>>>>
>>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>>
>>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>>>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
I just tried your fix.
It looks like we reintroduce the same issue as before: when executed
log:tail once, the log messages are display on System.out.
I reopen the Jira to take a look on that.
Regards
JB
On 11/11/2013 03:25 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
> Hi JB,
>
> Fixed.
>
> Thanks
> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
> Twitter: freemanfang
> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
> weibo: @Freeman小屋
>
>
>
> On 2013-11-11, at 上午2:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> @Freeman: it seems that the latest changes on log:tail (with the introduction on a dedicated thread to avoid "interference" from some binding keys) provide an issue: the CPU is used at 100% during the log:tail execution (due to fast looping).
>> Karaf 2.3.x is affected but also Karaf 3.0.0.
>>
>> If you have some time to fix that, else I will do it tomorrow.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>
>>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>>
>>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>>
>>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>>
>>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>>> pending Jira).
>>>
>>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>>
>>>> So, today, I will:
>>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>>
>>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
Hi JB,
Fixed.
Thanks
－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: @Freeman小屋
On 2013-11-11, at 上午2:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> @Freeman: it seems that the latest changes on log:tail (with the introduction on a dedicated thread to avoid "interference" from some binding keys) provide an issue: the CPU is used at 100% during the log:tail execution (due to fast looping).
> Karaf 2.3.x is affected but also Karaf 3.0.0.
>
> If you have some time to fix that, else I will do it tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>
>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>
>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>
>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>
>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>> pending Jira).
>>
>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>
>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>
>>> So, today, I will:
>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>
>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>> release.
>>>
>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2552
It's a critical issue, I will take a look asap.
Regards
JB
On 11/10/2013 07:39 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> @Freeman: it seems that the latest changes on log:tail (with the
> introduction on a dedicated thread to avoid "interference" from some
> binding keys) provide an issue: the CPU is used at 100% during the
> log:tail execution (due to fast looping).
> Karaf 2.3.x is affected but also Karaf 3.0.0.
>
> If you have some time to fix that, else I will do it tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>>
>> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>>
>> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>>
>> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>>
>> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
>> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
>> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
>> pending Jira).
>>
>> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>>
>>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>>
>>> So, today, I will:
>>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>>
>>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>>> release.
>>>
>>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Toward Karaf 3.0.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
@Freeman: it seems that the latest changes on log:tail (with the
introduction on a dedicated thread to avoid "interference" from some
binding keys) provide an issue: the CPU is used at 100% during the
log:tail execution (due to fast looping).
Karaf 2.3.x is affected but also Karaf 3.0.0.
If you have some time to fix that, else I will do it tomorrow.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On 11/10/2013 07:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We did good progress on trunk to prepare Karaf 3.0.0.
>
> We have now 19 pending Jira for 3.0.0.
>
> I will tackle all these Jira tonight and tomorrow.
>
> I propose to submit Karaf 3.0.0 to vote on Thursday, 14th November.
>
> I plan to test Karaf 3.0.0 on Linux (RHEL, Debian and Ubuntu on x86),
> Windows 7, Solaris (9 and 10, on both Sparc and x86) and AIX (6 and 8,
> on Power5 and Power6) tomorrow night (after my commits to complete the
> pending Jira).
>
> If some of you have time to perform some tests, it would be great.
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 10/08/2013 04:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks to Dan, we got the Aries release required for Karaf 3.0.0.
>> I'm upgrading on Karaf trunk.
>>
>> I'm working on the latest mandatory improvement (KARAF-2496) now.
>>
>> So, today, I will:
>> - commit both blueprint upgrade and KARAF-2496
>> - update Jira to add 3.0.1 version
>> - review the Jira and move to 3.0.1
>>
>> I discussed with Jamie this morning, he's ready to cut off the 3.0.0
>> release.
>>
>> I propose to prepare the release and vote for next Thursday (it gives
>> some time to latest fixes and tests tomorrow).
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com