You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/11/14 17:09:00 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24712] New: - macrodef sequential should be implicit

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24712>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24712

macrodef sequential should be implicit

           Summary: macrodef sequential should be implicit
           Product: Ant
           Version: 1.6Beta
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Enhancement
          Priority: Other
         Component: Core tasks
        AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org
        ReportedBy: gudnabrsam@yahoo.com


If the nested <sequential> is required, and no substitute is possible (as was 
the case in the beginning when a <parallel> was also allowed), then isn't it 
just a waste of 25 keystrokes to include it?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org