You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "eric baldeschwieler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/09/28 05:43:50 UTC

[jira] Created: (HADOOP-564) we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs

we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs
-------------------------------------

                 Key: HADOOP-564
                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564
             Project: Hadoop
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: eric baldeschwieler


Minor nit, but it seems that we should choose a protocol name that is likely not to conflict with other distributed FS projects.  HDFS seems less likely to.  

Right now this will be trivial to change.  Just wanted to socialize this before doing the search and replace.  

PS right now the dfs: usage is not consistent and has crept into a couple of new features the y! team is working on (caching of files and distcp).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

[jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-564) we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs

Posted by "Wendy Chien (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Wendy Chien reassigned HADOOP-564:
----------------------------------

    Assignee: Wendy Chien  (was: Sameer Paranjpye)

> we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-564
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: eric baldeschwieler
>         Assigned To: Wendy Chien
>
> Minor nit, but it seems that we should choose a protocol name that is likely not to conflict with other distributed FS projects.  HDFS seems less likely to.  
> Right now this will be trivial to change.  Just wanted to socialize this before doing the search and replace.  
> PS right now the dfs: usage is not consistent and has crept into a couple of new features the y! team is working on (caching of files and distcp).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (HADOOP-564) we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs

Posted by "Wendy Chien (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Wendy Chien updated HADOOP-564:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: hadoop-564.patch

Changed a bunch of dfs: to hdfs:

> we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-564
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: eric baldeschwieler
>         Assigned To: Wendy Chien
>         Attachments: hadoop-564.patch
>
>
> Minor nit, but it seems that we should choose a protocol name that is likely not to conflict with other distributed FS projects.  HDFS seems less likely to.  
> Right now this will be trivial to change.  Just wanted to socialize this before doing the search and replace.  
> PS right now the dfs: usage is not consistent and has crept into a couple of new features the y! team is working on (caching of files and distcp).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (HADOOP-564) we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs

Posted by "Sameer Paranjpye (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564?page=all ]

Sameer Paranjpye updated HADOOP-564:
------------------------------------

    Component/s: dfs

> we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-564
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: eric baldeschwieler
>
> Minor nit, but it seems that we should choose a protocol name that is likely not to conflict with other distributed FS projects.  HDFS seems less likely to.  
> Right now this will be trivial to change.  Just wanted to socialize this before doing the search and replace.  
> PS right now the dfs: usage is not consistent and has crept into a couple of new features the y! team is working on (caching of files and distcp).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

[jira] Updated: (HADOOP-564) we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs

Posted by "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-564:
--------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 0.12.0
           Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

I just committed this.  Thanks, Wendy!

> we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-564
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: eric baldeschwieler
>         Assigned To: Wendy Chien
>             Fix For: 0.12.0
>
>         Attachments: hadoop-564.patch
>
>
> Minor nit, but it seems that we should choose a protocol name that is likely not to conflict with other distributed FS projects.  HDFS seems less likely to.  
> Right now this will be trivial to change.  Just wanted to socialize this before doing the search and replace.  
> PS right now the dfs: usage is not consistent and has crept into a couple of new features the y! team is working on (caching of files and distcp).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (HADOOP-564) we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs

Posted by "Wendy Chien (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Wendy Chien updated HADOOP-564:
-------------------------------

    Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-564
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: eric baldeschwieler
>         Assigned To: Wendy Chien
>         Attachments: hadoop-564.patch
>
>
> Minor nit, but it seems that we should choose a protocol name that is likely not to conflict with other distributed FS projects.  HDFS seems less likely to.  
> Right now this will be trivial to change.  Just wanted to socialize this before doing the search and replace.  
> PS right now the dfs: usage is not consistent and has crept into a couple of new features the y! team is working on (caching of files and distcp).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.