You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Rob Tompkins <ch...@gmail.com> on 2016/07/01 19:34:05 UTC

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

+1 [contributor, not committer]

> On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:55:35 +0000 (UTC), venkatesha m wrote:
>> Does this use Java 8?
> 
> What is "this"?
> 
> If you want to discuss (rather than vote), please start a new
> thread.
> 
> Thank you,
> Gilles
> 
> 
>>    On Monday, 27 June 2016 2:20 AM, Gilles
>> <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:13:06 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>> On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory
>>>>>> <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons Lang
>>>>>> could
>>>>>> include a random package.
>>> 
>>> Yes, and it feels like an even more appropriate place for
>>> org.apache.commons.math3.util.FastMath (and maybe associated classes)
>>> due to the location of java.lang.Math.
>> 
>> I don't think so.
>> I'm in favour of "small" components.
>> 
>> Take into account that Commons Lang is probably less stable
>> than "FastMath": CL's top-level package name is now "lang3"
>> whereas this functionality would be located in a package whose
>> name would never change.
>> 
>> Also, since the JDK itself is going to be "modular", it is a
>> bit odd to go in the opposite direction.
>> 
>> 
>> Gilles
>> 
>>> -Rob
>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> For the same reason, [io] might be moved to [lang], too.
>>>> 
>>>> And [compress], [crypto], [imaging], [dbutils], [logging], [net].
>>>> ;-}
>>>> 
>>>> Gilles
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jochen
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

Posted by venkatesha m <ts...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
+1 

    On Saturday, 2 July 2016 1:27 AM, Artem Barger <ar...@bargr.net> wrote:
 

 +1 [contributor]

Best regards,
                      Artem Barger.

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Rob Tompkins <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 [contributor, not committer]
>
> > On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:55:35 +0000 (UTC), venkatesha m wrote:
> >> Does this use Java 8?
> >
> > What is "this"?
> >
> > If you want to discuss (rather than vote), please start a new
> > thread.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Gilles
> >
> >
> >>    On Monday, 27 June 2016 2:20 AM, Gilles
> >> <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:13:06 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> >>>> On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory
> >>>>>> <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons Lang
> >>>>>> could
> >>>>>> include a random package.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, and it feels like an even more appropriate place for
> >>> org.apache.commons.math3.util.FastMath (and maybe associated classes)
> >>> due to the location of java.lang.Math.
> >>
> >> I don't think so.
> >> I'm in favour of "small" components.
> >>
> >> Take into account that Commons Lang is probably less stable
> >> than "FastMath": CL's top-level package name is now "lang3"
> >> whereas this functionality would be located in a package whose
> >> name would never change.
> >>
> >> Also, since the JDK itself is going to be "modular", it is a
> >> bit odd to go in the opposite direction.
> >>
> >>
> >> Gilles
> >>
> >>> -Rob
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For the same reason, [io] might be moved to [lang], too.
> >>>>
> >>>> And [compress], [crypto], [imaging], [dbutils], [logging], [net].
> >>>> ;-}
> >>>>
> >>>> Gilles
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jochen
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

Posted by Artem Barger <ar...@bargr.net>.
+1 [contributor]

Best regards,
                      Artem Barger.

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Rob Tompkins <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 [contributor, not committer]
>
> > On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:55:35 +0000 (UTC), venkatesha m wrote:
> >> Does this use Java 8?
> >
> > What is "this"?
> >
> > If you want to discuss (rather than vote), please start a new
> > thread.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Gilles
> >
> >
> >>    On Monday, 27 June 2016 2:20 AM, Gilles
> >> <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:13:06 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> >>>> On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory
> >>>>>> <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons Lang
> >>>>>> could
> >>>>>> include a random package.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, and it feels like an even more appropriate place for
> >>> org.apache.commons.math3.util.FastMath (and maybe associated classes)
> >>> due to the location of java.lang.Math.
> >>
> >> I don't think so.
> >> I'm in favour of "small" components.
> >>
> >> Take into account that Commons Lang is probably less stable
> >> than "FastMath": CL's top-level package name is now "lang3"
> >> whereas this functionality would be located in a package whose
> >> name would never change.
> >>
> >> Also, since the JDK itself is going to be "modular", it is a
> >> bit odd to go in the opposite direction.
> >>
> >>
> >> Gilles
> >>
> >>> -Rob
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For the same reason, [io] might be moved to [lang], too.
> >>>>
> >>>> And [compress], [crypto], [imaging], [dbutils], [logging], [net].
> >>>> ;-}
> >>>>
> >>>> Gilles
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jochen
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>