You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Martin Krasser <de...@martin-krasser.de> on 2009/11/08 10:13:23 UTC

Camel vs. SMX Maven repository

Hi,

I started a thread on the Camel dev mailing list discussing which Maven 
repo to use for uploading new artifacts needed by Camel.

http://old.nabble.com/GAE-API-in-Maven-repo-tt26243221s22882.html

We finally discussed the two options:

- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo/ (ServiceMix Maven 
repo)
- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/ (Camel Maven repo)
Camel already uses the ServiceMix repo to download jars. Which option do 
you prefer?

Thanks,
Martin

Re: Camel vs. SMX Maven repository

Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Martin,

thanks for the update, I will add the new repo in the servicemix-camel pom.

Regards
JB

Martin Krasser wrote:
> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
> 
> seems that there are no objections against uploading the artifacts to 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo. So I'll put them there.
> 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré schrieb:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> for my part, I think that we need to consider Camel as a SMX 
>> dependency (like CXF, ActiveMQ, etc). So, Camel should upload 
>> artifacts and dependencies to 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo and the ServiceMix 
>> Camel component should have this repository in its pom.
>>
>> Let see the feeling of the other guys.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> Martin Krasser wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I started a thread on the Camel dev mailing list discussing which 
>>> Maven repo to use for uploading new artifacts needed by Camel.
>>>
>>> http://old.nabble.com/GAE-API-in-Maven-repo-tt26243221s22882.html
>>>
>>> We finally discussed the two options:
>>>
>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo/ (ServiceMix 
>>> Maven repo)
>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/ (Camel Maven repo)
>>> Camel already uses the ServiceMix repo to download jars. Which option 
>>> do you prefer?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: Camel vs. SMX Maven repository

Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Done,

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo has been added in the 
servicemix-camel component trunk.

Regards
JB

Martin Krasser wrote:
> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
> 
> seems that there are no objections against uploading the artifacts to 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo. So I'll put them there.
> 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré schrieb:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> for my part, I think that we need to consider Camel as a SMX 
>> dependency (like CXF, ActiveMQ, etc). So, Camel should upload 
>> artifacts and dependencies to 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo and the ServiceMix 
>> Camel component should have this repository in its pom.
>>
>> Let see the feeling of the other guys.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> Martin Krasser wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I started a thread on the Camel dev mailing list discussing which 
>>> Maven repo to use for uploading new artifacts needed by Camel.
>>>
>>> http://old.nabble.com/GAE-API-in-Maven-repo-tt26243221s22882.html
>>>
>>> We finally discussed the two options:
>>>
>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo/ (ServiceMix 
>>> Maven repo)
>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/ (Camel Maven repo)
>>> Camel already uses the ServiceMix repo to download jars. Which option 
>>> do you prefer?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: Camel vs. SMX Maven repository

Posted by Martin Krasser <de...@martin-krasser.de>.
Hi Jean-Baptiste,

seems that there are no objections against uploading the artifacts to 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo. So I'll put them there.

Jean-Baptiste Onofré schrieb:
> Hi Martin,
>
> for my part, I think that we need to consider Camel as a SMX 
> dependency (like CXF, ActiveMQ, etc). So, Camel should upload 
> artifacts and dependencies to 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo and the ServiceMix 
> Camel component should have this repository in its pom.
>
> Let see the feeling of the other guys.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Martin Krasser wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I started a thread on the Camel dev mailing list discussing which 
>> Maven repo to use for uploading new artifacts needed by Camel.
>>
>> http://old.nabble.com/GAE-API-in-Maven-repo-tt26243221s22882.html
>>
>> We finally discussed the two options:
>>
>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo/ (ServiceMix 
>> Maven repo)
>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/ (Camel Maven repo)
>> Camel already uses the ServiceMix repo to download jars. Which option 
>> do you prefer?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Martin
>>
>>
>

Re: Camel vs. SMX Maven repository

Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Martin,

for my part, I think that we need to consider Camel as a SMX dependency 
(like CXF, ActiveMQ, etc). So, Camel should upload artifacts and 
dependencies to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo and the 
ServiceMix Camel component should have this repository in its pom.

Let see the feeling of the other guys.

Regards
JB

Martin Krasser wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I started a thread on the Camel dev mailing list discussing which Maven 
> repo to use for uploading new artifacts needed by Camel.
> 
> http://old.nabble.com/GAE-API-in-Maven-repo-tt26243221s22882.html
> 
> We finally discussed the two options:
> 
> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo/ (ServiceMix Maven 
> repo)
> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/ (Camel Maven repo)
> Camel already uses the ServiceMix repo to download jars. Which option do 
> you prefer?
> 
> Thanks,
> Martin
> 
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
jb@nanthrax.net
PGP : 17D4F086