You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Hudson (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/08/30 13:25:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22933) Do not need to kick reassign for rs group change any more

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16919533#comment-16919533 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22933:
--------------------------------

Results for branch master
	[build #1377 on builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1377/]: (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1377//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1377//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1377//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> Do not need to kick reassign for rs group change any more
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-22933
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22933
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: rsgroup
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.3.0, 2.2.2
>
>
> The old implementation is a bit strange, the isStuck method is like this:
> {code}
>   public boolean isStuck() {
>     return isInState(State.FAILED_OPEN) && getProcedure() != null;
>   }
> {code}
> It can only return true when there are ongoing procedures. But if we have a procedure, then the procedure will try to reassign region. Scheduling a new procedure does not make sense here, at least for branch-2.2+.
> I suggest we just remove the related code, since the default retry number for assigning a region is Integer.MAX_VALUE. And even if user set this to small value and finally the region is left in FAILED_OPEN state without a procedure, HBCK2 is used to deal with this, it is not necessary to deal it automatically.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)