You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de> on 2008/06/26 14:33:02 UTC
[VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02
I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.
The release artifacts are available on
people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02
For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar and a readme packaged as zip (uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.zip).
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02 is ready and can be released
[ ] 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues
-- Michael
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.
>
> The release artifacts are available on
>
> people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02
>
>
> For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar and a readme packaged as zip (uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.zip).
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1 uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02 is ready and can be released
> [ ] 0 don't care
> [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues
>
> -- Michael
+1
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate
02
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
The vote runs for more than 72 hours and we have enough +1 votes to pass.
Vote result:
+1 Marshall Schor
+1 Adam Lally
+1 Edward Epstein
+1 Joern Kottmann
+1 Thilo Goetz
+1 Michael Baessler
No 0 or -1 votes received.
The vote passes.
I will ask on Incubator for review and approval.
-- Michael
Michael Baessler wrote:
> I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.
>
> The release artifacts are available on
>
> people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02
>
>
> For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar and a readme packaged as zip (uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.zip).
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1 uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02 is ready and can be released
> [ ] 0 don't care
> [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues
>
> -- Michael
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02
Posted by Eddie Epstein <ea...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>
wrote:
> I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release
> uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.
>
> The release artifacts are available on
>
> people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02
>
>
> For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar and a readme packaged as zip
> (uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.zip).
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1 uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02 is ready and can be
> released
> [ ] 0 don't care
> [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues
>
> -- Michael
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Michael Baessler
<mb...@michael-baessler.de> wrote:
> I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.
>
> The release artifacts are available on
>
> people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02
>
>
> For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar and a readme packaged as zip (uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.zip).
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1 uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02 is ready and can be released
> [ ] 0 don't care
> [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues
>
> -- Michael
>
+1
-Adam
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.
>
> The release artifacts are available on
>
> people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02
>
>
> For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar and a readme packaged as zip (uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.zip).
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1 uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02 is ready and can be released
> [ ] 0 don't care
> [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues
>
> -- Michael
>
+1
-- Michael
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02
Posted by Jörn Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>.
On Jun 26, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Michael Baessler wrote:
> I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release
> uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.
>
> The release artifacts are available on
>
> people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02
>
>
> For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar and a readme packaged as
> zip (uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.zip).
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1 uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02 is ready and
> can be released
> [ ] 0 don't care
> [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues
+1
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Michael Baessler wrote:
>> Marshall Schor wrote:
>>> Michael Baessler wrote:
> [...]
>>> 4) The POM included in the Jar under the "maven" directory shows the
>>> parent of this artifact to be the pom org.apache.uima : uimaj :
>>> 2.2.2-01-incubating. I think this means that when maven artifacts are
>>> uploaded, the uimaj POM needs to be "released" as well. Because of
>>> this, I would suggest in the note for the general@incubator vote, to
>>> include a link to this in the SVN tag, along with a note that this
>>> would
>>> be uploaded to the incubator maven repository as part of the release.
>> Not sure if we really want to upload this hotfix also to the Maven
>> repository.
>> I would say no, just upload real releases.
>
> I agree with Michael. Since we changed the version number for the
> core jar, wouldn't we need to build and upload a complete UIMA
> distribution?
I think it's fine to not do a maven upload for this hot fix. -Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>> Michael Baessler wrote:
[...]
>> 4) The POM included in the Jar under the "maven" directory shows the
>> parent of this artifact to be the pom org.apache.uima : uimaj :
>> 2.2.2-01-incubating. I think this means that when maven artifacts are
>> uploaded, the uimaj POM needs to be "released" as well. Because of
>> this, I would suggest in the note for the general@incubator vote, to
>> include a link to this in the SVN tag, along with a note that this would
>> be uploaded to the incubator maven repository as part of the release.
> Not sure if we really want to upload this hotfix also to the Maven repository.
> I would say no, just upload real releases.
I agree with Michael. Since we changed the version number for the
core jar, wouldn't we need to build and upload a complete UIMA
distribution?
--Thilo
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Marshall Schor wrote:
> Michael Baessler wrote:
>> I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release
>> uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.
>>
>> The release artifacts are available on
>>
>> people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02
>>
>>
>> For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar and a readme packaged as zip
>> (uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.zip).
>>
>> Please cast your vote:
>>
>> [ ] +1 uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02 is ready and
>> can be released
>> [ ] 0 don't care
>> [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues
>>
> +1
>
> Observations - no blockers, but in my review I noticed the following:
>
> 1) I see the hot fix packaging is just Zip? No Tars? This is probably
> OK in that the released artifact is just the Java JAR file which should
> be platform independent.
Yes, I thought a Zip should be sufficient since it is just used to package the hotfix readme with
the platform independent jar.
>
> 2) The components being released do not link to the corresponding
> source(s). Not a blocker, but if we redo, I think it would be good to
> identify in the readme where the source that corresponds to this is
> (what tag in SVN).
Good idea, will do if we have to redo.
>
> 3) I would note on the post to general@incubator.a.o that the LICENSE,
> NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files are inside the Jar, and that RAT was not
> run since there was only 1 file (the JAR), and the Readme.
Will do.
>
> 4) The POM included in the Jar under the "maven" directory shows the
> parent of this artifact to be the pom org.apache.uima : uimaj :
> 2.2.2-01-incubating. I think this means that when maven artifacts are
> uploaded, the uimaj POM needs to be "released" as well. Because of
> this, I would suggest in the note for the general@incubator vote, to
> include a link to this in the SVN tag, along with a note that this would
> be uploaded to the incubator maven repository as part of the release.
Not sure if we really want to upload this hotfix also to the Maven repository.
I would say no, just upload real releases.
>
> 5) I verified that the main uima documentation has been updated with the
> new performance tuning options.
>
> Found one typo in the README-Hotfix1 (not a blocker, fixed in SVN):
> "There is a small number of performance tuning options" ->
> "There are a small number of performance tuning options"
Try to fix it if we have to redo.
>
> 6) In a separate thread I propose some change to the documentation for
> JCAS_CACHE_ENABLED. Current doc in the readme is ok for this release.
>
> -Marshall
Thanks for looking into the details!
-- Michael
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.
>
> The release artifacts are available on
>
> people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02
>
>
> For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar and a readme packaged as zip (uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.zip).
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1 uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02 is ready and can be released
> [ ] 0 don't care
> [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues
>
+1
Observations - no blockers, but in my review I noticed the following:
1) I see the hot fix packaging is just Zip? No Tars? This is probably
OK in that the released artifact is just the Java JAR file which should
be platform independent.
2) The components being released do not link to the corresponding
source(s). Not a blocker, but if we redo, I think it would be good to
identify in the readme where the source that corresponds to this is
(what tag in SVN).
3) I would note on the post to general@incubator.a.o that the LICENSE,
NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files are inside the Jar, and that RAT was not
run since there was only 1 file (the JAR), and the Readme.
4) The POM included in the Jar under the "maven" directory shows the
parent of this artifact to be the pom org.apache.uima : uimaj :
2.2.2-01-incubating. I think this means that when maven artifacts are
uploaded, the uimaj POM needs to be "released" as well. Because of
this, I would suggest in the note for the general@incubator vote, to
include a link to this in the SVN tag, along with a note that this would
be uploaded to the incubator maven repository as part of the release.
5) I verified that the main uima documentation has been updated with the
new performance tuning options.
Found one typo in the README-Hotfix1 (not a blocker, fixed in SVN):
"There is a small number of performance tuning options" ->
"There are a small number of performance tuning options"
6) In a separate thread I propose some change to the documentation for
JCAS_CACHE_ENABLED. Current doc in the readme is ok for this release.
-Marshall