Should we include javdoc in binary distro?

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

What do people think about including javadoc in the binary distro? 
Obviously the javadoc won't be in the SVN but should it be included in
the distro?  What about the javadoc for the TLD?

sean

Re: Should we include javdoc in binary distro?

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

Sounds good.  Manfred is right that it was always included.  The
javadocs will be separated by subproject as well.  That will be nice.

sean

On 6/28/05, James Cooper <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the TLD javadoc should definitely be included in the distro,
> and would not mind seeing the core TLD as well.
> 
> My two cents worth,
> James
> 
> On 6/28/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What do people think about including javadoc in the binary distro?
> > Obviously the javadoc won't be in the SVN but should it be included in
> > the distro?  What about the javadoc for the TLD?
> >
> > sean
> >
>

Re: Should we include javdoc in binary distro?

[James Cooper <ar...@gmail.com>]

I think the TLD javadoc should definitely be included in the distro,
and would not mind seeing the core TLD as well.

My two cents worth,
James

On 6/28/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What do people think about including javadoc in the binary distro?
> Obviously the javadoc won't be in the SVN but should it be included in
> the distro?  What about the javadoc for the TLD?
> 
> sean
>

Re: Should we include javdoc in binary distro?

[Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>]

+1
it was always included
and that's what everybody expects, at least for the custom components
code and taglib - it's the place where much of the documention is now,
and where people also expect it most for an open source product

-Manfred


2005/6/28, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> What do people think about including javadoc in the binary distro?
> Obviously the javadoc won't be in the SVN but should it be included in
> the distro?  What about the javadoc for the TLD?
> 
> sean
>