Re: JavaHL package name? (was: Discussion: graduating Subversion)

["Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu>]

On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:

> 
> On Jan 26, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Martin Furter wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> 
>>> My take is deprecate the old package names (org.tigris.*), add the new
>>> package name (org.apache.subversion.*), and remove the deprecated
>>> names whenever we go to 2.0.
>>> 
>>> I'm moderately ambivalent on whether this happens for 1.7 or if can
>>> wait for 1.8...
>>> 
>>> I don't see much else we can do under our versioning policies.  -- justin
>> 
>> How about transforming all classes in org.tigris.subversion to wrappers around org.apache.subversion classes and replace the interfaces with empty ones derived from the apache interfaces (plus their current parent interface)?
> 
> I think this is the way to go.  I was playing around last night with re-jiggering the java code into the new package(s), and got something reasonable put together.  I'll commit it shortly, and I invite folks to comment / criticize.

Alrighty.  As of r908323, I've got the JavaHL packages moved over to the Apache namespace, with the old package implemented as a wrapper around the new.  I have had to make a number of changes to the JavaHL build system, and have probably completely broken the JavaHL build system on Windows, so I encourage somebody building JavaHL on Windows to take a look.

Validation of the new classes and the wrappers would be nice, too.

Thanks,
-Hyrum