You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> on 2006/08/17 03:22:27 UTC
Flash and Tacos?
Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using Tapestry 4.0.2, Tacos
(latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on Fedora Core 5
x86_64.
It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a browser that doesn't
have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot adobe/macromedia), my
site refuses to render at all. Only after I added disableFlashStorage: true
to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me to use my site.
Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so, can we put this in
the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to search endlessly
for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev list that led me to
this solution.
Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out yet...
Thanks,
Andrew Ofisher
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com>.
Also, latest version of the flash plugin on linux fixes it. I just
downloaded it from adobe/macromedia and no more crash.
On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Fedora Core 5, 1.5.0.6. Just ran ff in gdb and its the flash plugin that
> is seg faulting. Im not sure why it gets through one or two pages before it
> decides to seg fault, but I would figure I could put the blame on flash.
> The exact crash was in PolicyFileManager::DoPolicyFileRequests(), in case
> you were really wondering.
>
> No problem with the grunt work, I like understand why things break. Guess
> that's why I'm a programmer. I was hoping to start getting more involved in
> Tapestry since I use it so much for my web apps.
>
> -Andrew Ofisher
>
> On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert < jkuhnert@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Great! Thanks for doing so much grunt work Andrew.
> >
> > I'd still be interested in knowing what the problem is with your version
> > of
> > firefox though.
> >
> > I'm on ubuntu linux with ff 1.5.0.5, what about you?
> >
> > On 8/17/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok. I found the culprit. Not sure if this needs to be submitted to
> > dojo
> > > as
> > > well. It seems that the embed tag is never ended properly, which
> > places
> > > the
> > > contents of the whole page under the object tag for the flash
> > file. When
> > > flash is not available, the rest of the page does not display
> > properly.
> > >
> > > dojo.js line 8072 (also dojo.uncompressed.js line 11830)
> > > or the original file flash.js line 717:
> > > The line ends with escape(dojoPath); and the next line continues
> > > appending
> > > to the string with a + 'pluginspage.....
> > >
> > > The fix is to remove the semicolon; easy as that. Firefox or any
> > browser
> > > without flash will now display the page correctly without needing
> > > disableFlashStorage: true.
> > > This is already fixed in the latest version of dojo so no need to
> > submit a
> > > patch/file bug there. It still exists under the demo section of the
> > > tacos-4.0 trunk....
> > >
> > > This does not fix the crashing I am experiencing with Firefox i386 and
> > the
> > > macromedia flash plugin enabled, but that has to be a firefox or flash
> > > bug,
> > > not dojo.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Andrew Ofisher
> > >
> > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ok, after some debugging (I love firefox), I am starting to see what
> > is
> > > > going on. Apparently dojo is adding, right under the body node, two
> > > nodes.
> > > > An iframe with the id djhistory and a div called
> > > flashObjectContainer. It
> > > > is under this div that real site is placed. The div is set with
> > > absolute
> > > > positioning with top: -1000px and left: -1000px. When I remove the
> > > > positioning (again, I love FireBug), I can see the site again. This
> > is
> > > on
> > > > Firefox 64bit with no flash plugin.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > With 32bit Firefox i'm using the macromedia one. Firefox 1.5.0.6i386
> > > > > on fedora core 5 and it crashes on the second page of my
> > site...loads
> > > the
> > > > > first for some reason (not doing any ajax requests, just following
> > a
> > > > > DirectLink which then redirects to another page). In 64bit(no
> > flash
> > > plugin,
> > > > > before adding disableFlashStorage: true, in both firefox and
> > > konqueror, I
> > > > > get a blank page.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert < jkuhnert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That IS weird. The 32 bit version of firefox is working fine for
> > me
> > > on
> > > > > > linux.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The 64bit firefox browser also never had any problems loading
> > dojo
> > > > > > stuff for
> > > > > > me. (when I used a 64 bit box for dev).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you using the macromedia flash plugin or one of the generic
> > > > > > (crappy)
> > > > > > free ones provided with some distros?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yea, it is really annoying to have to surf the net without a
> > flash
> > > > > > plugin,
> > > > > > > but not much I can do about it from within linux. The 32bit
> > > version
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > Firefox crashes with flash enabled viewing my site for some
> > > > > > reason....not
> > > > > > > sure if its a flash bug (which I'm betting on) or a Firefox
> > bug.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But yea, my main concern was that Firefox and Konqueror
> > refused to
> > > > > > render
> > > > > > > the page at all when the flash plugin was required (even
> > though it
> > > > > > > received
> > > > > > > the page, and javascript console gave no errors).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert < jkuhnert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yep...And once you figure out how to look at your local
> > flash
> > > > > > settings
> > > > > > > > you'd
> > > > > > > > be surprised at how many large corporations are already
> > using
> > > it.
> > > > > > BoA
> > > > > > > > definitely does, and I know ebay just had Brad over for a
> > talk
> > > of
> > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > kind.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Very handy stuff. Shouldn't render apps useless when the
> > plugin
> > > > > > isn't
> > > > > > > > installed though, I'll look into it...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 8/16/06, andyhot < andyhot@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies
> > but
> > > > > > allow
> > > > > > > much
> > > > > > > > > more data
> > > > > > > > > From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses
> > this.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making
> > use
> > > of
> > > > > > > this...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this
> > on
> > > the
> > > > > > tacos
> > > > > > > > > list that
> > > > > > > > > one can safely use it...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the
> > dojo
> > > > > > users
> > > > > > > list
> > > > > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > this. I don't currently provide a config option for
> > > disabling
> > > > > > flash
> > > > > > > > > > storage
> > > > > > > > > > but I can add one.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general
> > to
> > > see
> > > > > > what's
> > > > > > > > up.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using
> > > Tapestry
> > > > > > 4.0.2
> > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > > >> Tacos
> > > > > > > > > >> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on
> > > > > > Fedora Core
> > > > > > > 5
> > > > > > > > > >> x86_64.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a
> > > > > > browser that
> > > > > > > > > >> doesn't
> > > > > > > > > >> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot
> > > > > > > adobe/macromedia),
> > > > > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > >> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added
> > > > > > > > disableFlashStorage:
> > > > > > > > > >> true
> > > > > > > > > >> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow
> > me
> > > to
> > > > > > use my
> > > > > > > > > >> site.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so,
> > can
> > > > > > we put
> > > > > > > > > >> this in
> > > > > > > > > >> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have
> > to
> > > > > > search
> > > > > > > > > >> endlessly
> > > > > > > > > >> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the
> > dev
> > > list
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > >> led me
> > > > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > > > >> this solution.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1out
> > > > > > yet...
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > >> Andrew Ofisher
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org -
> > > http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > > > > > > > > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > > > > > > > > Open Source / J2EE Consulting
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > > > > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > > > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Kuhnert
> > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> >
> > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> >
> >
>
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>.
Ah great!
Knowing that you can launch ff in gdb and the fact that you had to find out
what the problem was probably hints at you making a great Tapestry dev :)
We'd welcome any newcomers to the team.(might have to do a few patches and
such to show your design chops but everyone does ...unless you have another
project where they can be seen)
On 8/17/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Fedora Core 5, 1.5.0.6. Just ran ff in gdb and its the flash plugin that
> is
> seg faulting. Im not sure why it gets through one or two pages before it
> decides to seg fault, but I would figure I could put the blame on flash.
> The exact crash was in PolicyFileManager::DoPolicyFileRequests(), in case
> you were really wondering.
>
> No problem with the grunt work, I like understand why things break. Guess
> that's why I'm a programmer. I was hoping to start getting more involved
> in
> Tapestry since I use it so much for my web apps.
>
> -Andrew Ofisher
>
> On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Great! Thanks for doing so much grunt work Andrew.
> >
> > I'd still be interested in knowing what the problem is with your version
> > of
> > firefox though.
> >
> > I'm on ubuntu linux with ff 1.5.0.5, what about you?
> >
> > On 8/17/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok. I found the culprit. Not sure if this needs to be submitted to
> dojo
> > > as
> > > well. It seems that the embed tag is never ended properly, which
> places
> > > the
> > > contents of the whole page under the object tag for the flash
> > file. When
> > > flash is not available, the rest of the page does not display
> properly.
> > >
> > > dojo.js line 8072 (also dojo.uncompressed.js line 11830)
> > > or the original file flash.js line 717:
> > > The line ends with escape(dojoPath); and the next line continues
> > > appending
> > > to the string with a + 'pluginspage.....
> > >
> > > The fix is to remove the semicolon; easy as that. Firefox or any
> > browser
> > > without flash will now display the page correctly without needing
> > > disableFlashStorage: true.
> > > This is already fixed in the latest version of dojo so no need to
> submit
> > a
> > > patch/file bug there. It still exists under the demo section of the
> > > tacos-4.0 trunk....
> > >
> > > This does not fix the crashing I am experiencing with Firefox i386 and
> > the
> > > macromedia flash plugin enabled, but that has to be a firefox or flash
> > > bug,
> > > not dojo.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Andrew Ofisher
> > >
> > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ok, after some debugging (I love firefox), I am starting to see what
> > is
> > > > going on. Apparently dojo is adding, right under the body node, two
> > > nodes.
> > > > An iframe with the id djhistory and a div called
> > > flashObjectContainer. It
> > > > is under this div that real site is placed. The div is set with
> > > absolute
> > > > positioning with top: -1000px and left: -1000px. When I remove the
> > > > positioning (again, I love FireBug), I can see the site again. This
> > is
> > > on
> > > > Firefox 64bit with no flash plugin.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > With 32bit Firefox i'm using the macromedia one. Firefox
> 1.5.0.6i386
> > > > > on fedora core 5 and it crashes on the second page of my
> > site...loads
> > > the
> > > > > first for some reason (not doing any ajax requests, just following
> a
> >
> > > > > DirectLink which then redirects to another page). In 64bit(no
> flash
> > > plugin,
> > > > > before adding disableFlashStorage: true, in both firefox and
> > > konqueror, I
> > > > > get a blank page.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert < jkuhnert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That IS weird. The 32 bit version of firefox is working fine for
> > me
> > > on
> > > > > > linux.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The 64bit firefox browser also never had any problems loading
> dojo
> > > > > > stuff for
> > > > > > me. (when I used a 64 bit box for dev).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you using the macromedia flash plugin or one of the generic
> > > > > > (crappy)
> > > > > > free ones provided with some distros?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yea, it is really annoying to have to surf the net without a
> > flash
> > > > > > plugin,
> > > > > > > but not much I can do about it from within linux. The 32bit
> > > version
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > Firefox crashes with flash enabled viewing my site for some
> > > > > > reason....not
> > > > > > > sure if its a flash bug (which I'm betting on) or a Firefox
> bug.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But yea, my main concern was that Firefox and Konqueror
> refused
> > to
> > > > > > render
> > > > > > > the page at all when the flash plugin was required (even
> though
> > it
> > > > > > > received
> > > > > > > the page, and javascript console gave no errors).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yep...And once you figure out how to look at your local
> flash
> > > > > > settings
> > > > > > > > you'd
> > > > > > > > be surprised at how many large corporations are already
> using
> > > it.
> > > > > > BoA
> > > > > > > > definitely does, and I know ebay just had Brad over for a
> talk
> > > of
> > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > kind.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Very handy stuff. Shouldn't render apps useless when the
> > plugin
> > > > > > isn't
> > > > > > > > installed though, I'll look into it...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 8/16/06, andyhot < andyhot@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies
> but
> >
> > > > > > allow
> > > > > > > much
> > > > > > > > > more data
> > > > > > > > > From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses
> > this.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making
> use
> >
> > > of
> > > > > > > this...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this
> on
> > > the
> > > > > > tacos
> > > > > > > > > list that
> > > > > > > > > one can safely use it...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the
> > dojo
> > > > > > users
> > > > > > > list
> > > > > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > this. I don't currently provide a config option for
> > > disabling
> > > > > > flash
> > > > > > > > > > storage
> > > > > > > > > > but I can add one.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general
> to
> > > see
> > > > > > what's
> > > > > > > > up.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using
> > > Tapestry
> > > > > > 4.0.2
> > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > > >> Tacos
> > > > > > > > > >> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on
> > > > > > Fedora Core
> > > > > > > 5
> > > > > > > > > >> x86_64.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a
> > > > > > browser that
> > > > > > > > > >> doesn't
> > > > > > > > > >> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot
> > > > > > > adobe/macromedia),
> > > > > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > >> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added
> > > > > > > > disableFlashStorage:
> > > > > > > > > >> true
> > > > > > > > > >> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow
> me
> > > to
> > > > > > use my
> > > > > > > > > >> site.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so,
> > can
> > > > > > we put
> > > > > > > > > >> this in
> > > > > > > > > >> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have
> to
> > > > > > search
> > > > > > > > > >> endlessly
> > > > > > > > > >> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the
> dev
> > > list
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > >> led me
> > > > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > > > >> this solution.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1out
> > > > > > yet...
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > >> Andrew Ofisher
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org -
> > > http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > > > > > > > > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > > > > > > > > Open Source / J2EE Consulting
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > > > > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > > > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Kuhnert
> > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> >
> > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> >
> >
>
>
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com>.
Fedora Core 5, 1.5.0.6. Just ran ff in gdb and its the flash plugin that is
seg faulting. Im not sure why it gets through one or two pages before it
decides to seg fault, but I would figure I could put the blame on flash.
The exact crash was in PolicyFileManager::DoPolicyFileRequests(), in case
you were really wondering.
No problem with the grunt work, I like understand why things break. Guess
that's why I'm a programmer. I was hoping to start getting more involved in
Tapestry since I use it so much for my web apps.
-Andrew Ofisher
On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Great! Thanks for doing so much grunt work Andrew.
>
> I'd still be interested in knowing what the problem is with your version
> of
> firefox though.
>
> I'm on ubuntu linux with ff 1.5.0.5, what about you?
>
> On 8/17/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ok. I found the culprit. Not sure if this needs to be submitted to dojo
> > as
> > well. It seems that the embed tag is never ended properly, which places
> > the
> > contents of the whole page under the object tag for the flash
> file. When
> > flash is not available, the rest of the page does not display properly.
> >
> > dojo.js line 8072 (also dojo.uncompressed.js line 11830)
> > or the original file flash.js line 717:
> > The line ends with escape(dojoPath); and the next line continues
> > appending
> > to the string with a + 'pluginspage.....
> >
> > The fix is to remove the semicolon; easy as that. Firefox or any
> browser
> > without flash will now display the page correctly without needing
> > disableFlashStorage: true.
> > This is already fixed in the latest version of dojo so no need to submit
> a
> > patch/file bug there. It still exists under the demo section of the
> > tacos-4.0 trunk....
> >
> > This does not fix the crashing I am experiencing with Firefox i386 and
> the
> > macromedia flash plugin enabled, but that has to be a firefox or flash
> > bug,
> > not dojo.
> >
> >
> > -Andrew Ofisher
> >
> > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok, after some debugging (I love firefox), I am starting to see what
> is
> > > going on. Apparently dojo is adding, right under the body node, two
> > nodes.
> > > An iframe with the id djhistory and a div called
> > flashObjectContainer. It
> > > is under this div that real site is placed. The div is set with
> > absolute
> > > positioning with top: -1000px and left: -1000px. When I remove the
> > > positioning (again, I love FireBug), I can see the site again. This
> is
> > on
> > > Firefox 64bit with no flash plugin.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > With 32bit Firefox i'm using the macromedia one. Firefox 1.5.0.6i386
> > > > on fedora core 5 and it crashes on the second page of my
> site...loads
> > the
> > > > first for some reason (not doing any ajax requests, just following a
>
> > > > DirectLink which then redirects to another page). In 64bit(no flash
> > plugin,
> > > > before adding disableFlashStorage: true, in both firefox and
> > konqueror, I
> > > > get a blank page.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert < jkuhnert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > That IS weird. The 32 bit version of firefox is working fine for
> me
> > on
> > > > > linux.
> > > > >
> > > > > The 64bit firefox browser also never had any problems loading dojo
> > > > > stuff for
> > > > > me. (when I used a 64 bit box for dev).
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you using the macromedia flash plugin or one of the generic
> > > > > (crappy)
> > > > > free ones provided with some distros?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yea, it is really annoying to have to surf the net without a
> flash
> > > > > plugin,
> > > > > > but not much I can do about it from within linux. The 32bit
> > version
> > > > > of
> > > > > > Firefox crashes with flash enabled viewing my site for some
> > > > > reason....not
> > > > > > sure if its a flash bug (which I'm betting on) or a Firefox bug.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But yea, my main concern was that Firefox and Konqueror refused
> to
> > > > > render
> > > > > > the page at all when the flash plugin was required (even though
> it
> > > > > > received
> > > > > > the page, and javascript console gave no errors).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yep...And once you figure out how to look at your local flash
> > > > > settings
> > > > > > > you'd
> > > > > > > be surprised at how many large corporations are already using
> > it.
> > > > > BoA
> > > > > > > definitely does, and I know ebay just had Brad over for a talk
> > of
> > > > > some
> > > > > > > kind.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Very handy stuff. Shouldn't render apps useless when the
> plugin
> > > > > isn't
> > > > > > > installed though, I'll look into it...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/16/06, andyhot < andyhot@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies but
>
> > > > > allow
> > > > > > much
> > > > > > > > more data
> > > > > > > > From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses
> this.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making use
>
> > of
> > > > > > this...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this on
> > the
> > > > > tacos
> > > > > > > > list that
> > > > > > > > one can safely use it...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the
> dojo
> > > > > users
> > > > > > list
> > > > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > this. I don't currently provide a config option for
> > disabling
> > > > > flash
> > > > > > > > > storage
> > > > > > > > > but I can add one.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general to
> > see
> > > > > what's
> > > > > > > up.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using
> > Tapestry
> > > > > 4.0.2
> > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > >> Tacos
> > > > > > > > >> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on
> > > > > Fedora Core
> > > > > > 5
> > > > > > > > >> x86_64.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a
> > > > > browser that
> > > > > > > > >> doesn't
> > > > > > > > >> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot
> > > > > > adobe/macromedia),
> > > > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > >> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added
> > > > > > > disableFlashStorage:
> > > > > > > > >> true
> > > > > > > > >> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me
> > to
> > > > > use my
> > > > > > > > >> site.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so,
> can
> > > > > we put
> > > > > > > > >> this in
> > > > > > > > >> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to
> > > > > search
> > > > > > > > >> endlessly
> > > > > > > > >> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev
> > list
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > > >> led me
> > > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > > >> this solution.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out
> > > > > yet...
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > >> Andrew Ofisher
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org -
> > http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > > > > > > > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > > > > > > > Open Source / J2EE Consulting
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > > > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > > > >
> > > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jesse Kuhnert
> Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
>
> Open source based consulting work centered around
> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
>
>
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>.
Great! Thanks for doing so much grunt work Andrew.
I'd still be interested in knowing what the problem is with your version of
firefox though.
I'm on ubuntu linux with ff 1.5.0.5, what about you?
On 8/17/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok. I found the culprit. Not sure if this needs to be submitted to dojo
> as
> well. It seems that the embed tag is never ended properly, which places
> the
> contents of the whole page under the object tag for the flash file. When
> flash is not available, the rest of the page does not display properly.
>
> dojo.js line 8072 (also dojo.uncompressed.js line 11830)
> or the original file flash.js line 717:
> The line ends with escape(dojoPath); and the next line continues
> appending
> to the string with a + 'pluginspage.....
>
> The fix is to remove the semicolon; easy as that. Firefox or any browser
> without flash will now display the page correctly without needing
> disableFlashStorage: true.
> This is already fixed in the latest version of dojo so no need to submit a
> patch/file bug there. It still exists under the demo section of the
> tacos-4.0 trunk....
>
> This does not fix the crashing I am experiencing with Firefox i386 and the
> macromedia flash plugin enabled, but that has to be a firefox or flash
> bug,
> not dojo.
>
>
> -Andrew Ofisher
>
> On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, after some debugging (I love firefox), I am starting to see what is
> > going on. Apparently dojo is adding, right under the body node, two
> nodes.
> > An iframe with the id djhistory and a div called
> flashObjectContainer. It
> > is under this div that real site is placed. The div is set with
> absolute
> > positioning with top: -1000px and left: -1000px. When I remove the
> > positioning (again, I love FireBug), I can see the site again. This is
> on
> > Firefox 64bit with no flash plugin.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > With 32bit Firefox i'm using the macromedia one. Firefox 1.5.0.6 i386
> > > on fedora core 5 and it crashes on the second page of my site...loads
> the
> > > first for some reason (not doing any ajax requests, just following a
> > > DirectLink which then redirects to another page). In 64bit(no flash
> plugin,
> > > before adding disableFlashStorage: true, in both firefox and
> konqueror, I
> > > get a blank page.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert < jkuhnert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That IS weird. The 32 bit version of firefox is working fine for me
> on
> > > > linux.
> > > >
> > > > The 64bit firefox browser also never had any problems loading dojo
> > > > stuff for
> > > > me. (when I used a 64 bit box for dev).
> > > >
> > > > Are you using the macromedia flash plugin or one of the generic
> > > > (crappy)
> > > > free ones provided with some distros?
> > > >
> > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yea, it is really annoying to have to surf the net without a flash
> > > > plugin,
> > > > > but not much I can do about it from within linux. The 32bit
> version
> > > > of
> > > > > Firefox crashes with flash enabled viewing my site for some
> > > > reason....not
> > > > > sure if its a flash bug (which I'm betting on) or a Firefox bug.
> > > > >
> > > > > But yea, my main concern was that Firefox and Konqueror refused to
> > > > render
> > > > > the page at all when the flash plugin was required (even though it
> > > > > received
> > > > > the page, and javascript console gave no errors).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yep...And once you figure out how to look at your local flash
> > > > settings
> > > > > > you'd
> > > > > > be surprised at how many large corporations are already using
> it.
> > > > BoA
> > > > > > definitely does, and I know ebay just had Brad over for a talk
> of
> > > > some
> > > > > > kind.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Very handy stuff. Shouldn't render apps useless when the plugin
> > > > isn't
> > > > > > installed though, I'll look into it...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/16/06, andyhot < andyhot@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies but
> > > > allow
> > > > > much
> > > > > > > more data
> > > > > > > From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making use
> of
> > > > > this...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this on
> the
> > > > tacos
> > > > > > > list that
> > > > > > > one can safely use it...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > > > > > > > I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the dojo
> > > > users
> > > > > list
> > > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > this. I don't currently provide a config option for
> disabling
> > > > flash
> > > > > > > > storage
> > > > > > > > but I can add one.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general to
> see
> > > > what's
> > > > > > up.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using
> Tapestry
> > > > 4.0.2
> > > > > ,
> > > > > > > >> Tacos
> > > > > > > >> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on
> > > > Fedora Core
> > > > > 5
> > > > > > > >> x86_64.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a
> > > > browser that
> > > > > > > >> doesn't
> > > > > > > >> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot
> > > > > adobe/macromedia),
> > > > > > > my
> > > > > > > >> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added
> > > > > > disableFlashStorage:
> > > > > > > >> true
> > > > > > > >> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me
> to
> > > > use my
> > > > > > > >> site.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so, can
> > > > we put
> > > > > > > >> this in
> > > > > > > >> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to
> > > > search
> > > > > > > >> endlessly
> > > > > > > >> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev
> list
> > > > that
> > > > > > > >> led me
> > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > >> this solution.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out
> > > > yet...
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> Andrew Ofisher
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org -
> http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > > > > > > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > > > > > > Open Source / J2EE Consulting
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > > >
> > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com>.
Ok. I found the culprit. Not sure if this needs to be submitted to dojo as
well. It seems that the embed tag is never ended properly, which places the
contents of the whole page under the object tag for the flash file. When
flash is not available, the rest of the page does not display properly.
dojo.js line 8072 (also dojo.uncompressed.js line 11830)
or the original file flash.js line 717:
The line ends with escape(dojoPath); and the next line continues appending
to the string with a + 'pluginspage.....
The fix is to remove the semicolon; easy as that. Firefox or any browser
without flash will now display the page correctly without needing
disableFlashStorage: true.
This is already fixed in the latest version of dojo so no need to submit a
patch/file bug there. It still exists under the demo section of the
tacos-4.0 trunk....
This does not fix the crashing I am experiencing with Firefox i386 and the
macromedia flash plugin enabled, but that has to be a firefox or flash bug,
not dojo.
-Andrew Ofisher
On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, after some debugging (I love firefox), I am starting to see what is
> going on. Apparently dojo is adding, right under the body node, two nodes.
> An iframe with the id djhistory and a div called flashObjectContainer. It
> is under this div that real site is placed. The div is set with absolute
> positioning with top: -1000px and left: -1000px. When I remove the
> positioning (again, I love FireBug), I can see the site again. This is on
> Firefox 64bit with no flash plugin.
>
>
>
>
> On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > With 32bit Firefox i'm using the macromedia one. Firefox 1.5.0.6 i386
> > on fedora core 5 and it crashes on the second page of my site...loads the
> > first for some reason (not doing any ajax requests, just following a
> > DirectLink which then redirects to another page). In 64bit(no flash plugin,
> > before adding disableFlashStorage: true, in both firefox and konqueror, I
> > get a blank page.
> >
> >
> > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert < jkuhnert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > That IS weird. The 32 bit version of firefox is working fine for me on
> > > linux.
> > >
> > > The 64bit firefox browser also never had any problems loading dojo
> > > stuff for
> > > me. (when I used a 64 bit box for dev).
> > >
> > > Are you using the macromedia flash plugin or one of the generic
> > > (crappy)
> > > free ones provided with some distros?
> > >
> > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yea, it is really annoying to have to surf the net without a flash
> > > plugin,
> > > > but not much I can do about it from within linux. The 32bit version
> > > of
> > > > Firefox crashes with flash enabled viewing my site for some
> > > reason....not
> > > > sure if its a flash bug (which I'm betting on) or a Firefox bug.
> > > >
> > > > But yea, my main concern was that Firefox and Konqueror refused to
> > > render
> > > > the page at all when the flash plugin was required (even though it
> > > > received
> > > > the page, and javascript console gave no errors).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yep...And once you figure out how to look at your local flash
> > > settings
> > > > > you'd
> > > > > be surprised at how many large corporations are already using it.
> > > BoA
> > > > > definitely does, and I know ebay just had Brad over for a talk of
> > > some
> > > > > kind.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Very handy stuff. Shouldn't render apps useless when the plugin
> > > isn't
> > > > > installed though, I'll look into it...
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/16/06, andyhot < andyhot@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies but
> > > allow
> > > > much
> > > > > > more data
> > > > > > From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making use of
> > > > this...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this on the
> > > tacos
> > > > > > list that
> > > > > > one can safely use it...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > > > > > > I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the dojo
> > > users
> > > > list
> > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > this. I don't currently provide a config option for disabling
> > > flash
> > > > > > > storage
> > > > > > > but I can add one.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general to see
> > > what's
> > > > > up.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using Tapestry
> > > 4.0.2
> > > > ,
> > > > > > >> Tacos
> > > > > > >> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on
> > > Fedora Core
> > > > 5
> > > > > > >> x86_64.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a
> > > browser that
> > > > > > >> doesn't
> > > > > > >> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot
> > > > adobe/macromedia),
> > > > > > my
> > > > > > >> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added
> > > > > disableFlashStorage:
> > > > > > >> true
> > > > > > >> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me to
> > > use my
> > > > > > >> site.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so, can
> > > we put
> > > > > > >> this in
> > > > > > >> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to
> > > search
> > > > > > >> endlessly
> > > > > > >> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev list
> > > that
> > > > > > >> led me
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >> this solution.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out
> > > yet...
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > >> Andrew Ofisher
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > > > > > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > > > > > Open Source / J2EE Consulting
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > > > >
> > > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > >
> > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com>.
Ok, after some debugging (I love firefox), I am starting to see what is
going on. Apparently dojo is adding, right under the body node, two nodes.
An iframe with the id djhistory and a div called flashObjectContainer. It
is under this div that real site is placed. The div is set with absolute
positioning with top: -1000px and left: -1000px. When I remove the
positioning (again, I love FireBug), I can see the site again. This is on
Firefox 64bit with no flash plugin.
On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With 32bit Firefox i'm using the macromedia one. Firefox 1.5.0.6 i386 on
> fedora core 5 and it crashes on the second page of my site...loads the first
> for some reason (not doing any ajax requests, just following a DirectLink
> which then redirects to another page). In 64bit(no flash plugin, before
> adding disableFlashStorage: true, in both firefox and konqueror, I get a
> blank page.
>
>
> On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > That IS weird. The 32 bit version of firefox is working fine for me on
> > linux.
> >
> > The 64bit firefox browser also never had any problems loading dojo stuff
> > for
> > me. (when I used a 64 bit box for dev).
> >
> > Are you using the macromedia flash plugin or one of the generic (crappy)
> >
> > free ones provided with some distros?
> >
> > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yea, it is really annoying to have to surf the net without a flash
> > plugin,
> > > but not much I can do about it from within linux. The 32bit version
> > of
> > > Firefox crashes with flash enabled viewing my site for some
> > reason....not
> > > sure if its a flash bug (which I'm betting on) or a Firefox bug.
> > >
> > > But yea, my main concern was that Firefox and Konqueror refused to
> > render
> > > the page at all when the flash plugin was required (even though it
> > > received
> > > the page, and javascript console gave no errors).
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yep...And once you figure out how to look at your local flash
> > settings
> > > > you'd
> > > > be surprised at how many large corporations are already using it.
> > BoA
> > > > definitely does, and I know ebay just had Brad over for a talk of
> > some
> > > > kind.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Very handy stuff. Shouldn't render apps useless when the plugin
> > isn't
> > > > installed though, I'll look into it...
> > > >
> > > > On 8/16/06, andyhot < andyhot@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies but allow
> > > much
> > > > > more data
> > > > > From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
> > > > >
> > > > > For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses this.
> > > > >
> > > > > But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making use of
> > > this...
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this on the
> > tacos
> > > > > list that
> > > > > one can safely use it...
> > > > >
> > > > > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > > > > > I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the dojo
> > users
> > > list
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > this. I don't currently provide a config option for disabling
> > flash
> > > > > > storage
> > > > > > but I can add one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general to see
> > what's
> > > > up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher < andrewofisher@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using Tapestry
> > 4.0.2
> > > ,
> > > > > >> Tacos
> > > > > >> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on Fedora
> > Core
> > > 5
> > > > > >> x86_64.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a browser
> > that
> > > > > >> doesn't
> > > > > >> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot
> > > adobe/macromedia),
> > > > > my
> > > > > >> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added
> > > > disableFlashStorage:
> > > > > >> true
> > > > > >> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me to
> > use my
> > > > > >> site.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so, can we
> > put
> > > > > >> this in
> > > > > >> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to search
> > > > > >> endlessly
> > > > > >> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev list
> > that
> > > > > >> led me
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> this solution.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out yet...
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> Andrew Ofisher
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > > > > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > > > > Open Source / J2EE Consulting
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > > >
> > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Kuhnert
> > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> >
> > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> >
> >
>
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com>.
With 32bit Firefox i'm using the macromedia one. Firefox 1.5.0.6 i386 on
fedora core 5 and it crashes on the second page of my site...loads the first
for some reason (not doing any ajax requests, just following a DirectLink
which then redirects to another page). In 64bit(no flash plugin, before
adding disableFlashStorage: true, in both firefox and konqueror, I get a
blank page.
On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That IS weird. The 32 bit version of firefox is working fine for me on
> linux.
>
> The 64bit firefox browser also never had any problems loading dojo stuff
> for
> me. (when I used a 64 bit box for dev).
>
> Are you using the macromedia flash plugin or one of the generic (crappy)
> free ones provided with some distros?
>
> On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yea, it is really annoying to have to surf the net without a flash
> plugin,
> > but not much I can do about it from within linux. The 32bit version of
> > Firefox crashes with flash enabled viewing my site for some
> reason....not
> > sure if its a flash bug (which I'm betting on) or a Firefox bug.
> >
> > But yea, my main concern was that Firefox and Konqueror refused to
> render
> > the page at all when the flash plugin was required (even though it
> > received
> > the page, and javascript console gave no errors).
> >
> >
> > On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yep...And once you figure out how to look at your local flash settings
> > > you'd
> > > be surprised at how many large corporations are already using it. BoA
> > > definitely does, and I know ebay just had Brad over for a talk of some
> > > kind.
> > >
> > >
> > > Very handy stuff. Shouldn't render apps useless when the plugin isn't
> > > installed though, I'll look into it...
> > >
> > > On 8/16/06, andyhot <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies but allow
> > much
> > > > more data
> > > > From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
> > > >
> > > > For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses this.
> > > >
> > > > But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making use of
> > this...
> > > >
> > > > Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this on the
> tacos
> > > > list that
> > > > one can safely use it...
> > > >
> > > > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > > > > I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the dojo users
> > list
> > > > > about
> > > > > this. I don't currently provide a config option for disabling
> flash
> > > > > storage
> > > > > but I can add one.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general to see
> what's
> > > up.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using Tapestry
> 4.0.2
> > ,
> > > > >> Tacos
> > > > >> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on Fedora
> Core
> > 5
> > > > >> x86_64.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a browser
> that
> > > > >> doesn't
> > > > >> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot
> > adobe/macromedia),
> > > > my
> > > > >> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added
> > > disableFlashStorage:
> > > > >> true
> > > > >> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me to use
> my
> > > > >> site.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so, can we
> put
> > > > >> this in
> > > > >> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to search
> > > > >> endlessly
> > > > >> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev list
> that
> > > > >> led me
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> this solution.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out yet...
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> Andrew Ofisher
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > > > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > > > Open Source / J2EE Consulting
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> > >
> > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jesse Kuhnert
> Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
>
> Open source based consulting work centered around
> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
>
>
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by andyhot <an...@di.uoa.gr>.
Jesse, i also had the same issue (page rendered blank) in
Windows 2003 Server + IE6
when flash plugin was missing and (perhaps) security was set high
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> That IS weird. The 32 bit version of firefox is working fine for me on
> linux.
>
> The 64bit firefox browser also never had any problems loading dojo
> stuff for
> me. (when I used a 64 bit box for dev).
>
> Are you using the macromedia flash plugin or one of the generic (crappy)
> free ones provided with some distros?
>
> On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yea, it is really annoying to have to surf the net without a flash
>> plugin,
>> but not much I can do about it from within linux. The 32bit version of
>> Firefox crashes with flash enabled viewing my site for some
>> reason....not
>> sure if its a flash bug (which I'm betting on) or a Firefox bug.
>>
>> But yea, my main concern was that Firefox and Konqueror refused to
>> render
>> the page at all when the flash plugin was required (even though it
>> received
>> the page, and javascript console gave no errors).
>>
>>
>> On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yep...And once you figure out how to look at your local flash settings
>> > you'd
>> > be surprised at how many large corporations are already using it. BoA
>> > definitely does, and I know ebay just had Brad over for a talk of some
>> > kind.
>> >
>> >
>> > Very handy stuff. Shouldn't render apps useless when the plugin isn't
>> > installed though, I'll look into it...
>> >
>> > On 8/16/06, andyhot <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies but allow
>> much
>> > > more data
>> > > From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
>> > >
>> > > For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses this.
>> > >
>> > > But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making use of
>> this...
>> > >
>> > > Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this on the
>> tacos
>> > > list that
>> > > one can safely use it...
>> > >
>> > > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
>> > > > I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the dojo users
>> list
>> > > > about
>> > > > this. I don't currently provide a config option for disabling
>> flash
>> > > > storage
>> > > > but I can add one.
>> > > >
>> > > > I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general to see
>> what's
>> > up.
>> > > >
>> > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using Tapestry
>> 4.0.2
>> ,
>> > > >> Tacos
>> > > >> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on Fedora
>> Core
>> 5
>> > > >> x86_64.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a browser
>> that
>> > > >> doesn't
>> > > >> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot
>> adobe/macromedia),
>> > > my
>> > > >> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added
>> > disableFlashStorage:
>> > > >> true
>> > > >> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me to
>> use my
>> > > >> site.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so, can we
>> put
>> > > >> this in
>> > > >> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to search
>> > > >> endlessly
>> > > >> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev list
>> that
>> > > >> led me
>> > > >> to
>> > > >> this solution.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out yet...
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks,
>> > > >> Andrew Ofisher
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
>> > > Tapestry / Tacos developer
>> > > Open Source / J2EE Consulting
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jesse Kuhnert
>> > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
>> >
>> > Open source based consulting work centered around
>> > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
--
Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
Tapestry / Tacos developer
Open Source / J2EE Consulting
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>.
That IS weird. The 32 bit version of firefox is working fine for me on
linux.
The 64bit firefox browser also never had any problems loading dojo stuff for
me. (when I used a 64 bit box for dev).
Are you using the macromedia flash plugin or one of the generic (crappy)
free ones provided with some distros?
On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yea, it is really annoying to have to surf the net without a flash plugin,
> but not much I can do about it from within linux. The 32bit version of
> Firefox crashes with flash enabled viewing my site for some reason....not
> sure if its a flash bug (which I'm betting on) or a Firefox bug.
>
> But yea, my main concern was that Firefox and Konqueror refused to render
> the page at all when the flash plugin was required (even though it
> received
> the page, and javascript console gave no errors).
>
>
> On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yep...And once you figure out how to look at your local flash settings
> > you'd
> > be surprised at how many large corporations are already using it. BoA
> > definitely does, and I know ebay just had Brad over for a talk of some
> > kind.
> >
> >
> > Very handy stuff. Shouldn't render apps useless when the plugin isn't
> > installed though, I'll look into it...
> >
> > On 8/16/06, andyhot <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies but allow
> much
> > > more data
> > > From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
> > >
> > > For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses this.
> > >
> > > But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making use of
> this...
> > >
> > > Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this on the tacos
> > > list that
> > > one can safely use it...
> > >
> > > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > > > I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the dojo users
> list
> > > > about
> > > > this. I don't currently provide a config option for disabling flash
> > > > storage
> > > > but I can add one.
> > > >
> > > > I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general to see what's
> > up.
> > > >
> > > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using Tapestry 4.0.2
> ,
> > > >> Tacos
> > > >> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on Fedora Core
> 5
> > > >> x86_64.
> > > >>
> > > >> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a browser that
> > > >> doesn't
> > > >> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot
> adobe/macromedia),
> > > my
> > > >> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added
> > disableFlashStorage:
> > > >> true
> > > >> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me to use my
> > > >> site.
> > > >>
> > > >> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so, can we put
> > > >> this in
> > > >> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to search
> > > >> endlessly
> > > >> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev list that
> > > >> led me
> > > >> to
> > > >> this solution.
> > > >>
> > > >> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out yet...
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Andrew Ofisher
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > > Open Source / J2EE Consulting
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Kuhnert
> > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
> >
> > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
> >
> >
>
>
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com>.
Yea, it is really annoying to have to surf the net without a flash plugin,
but not much I can do about it from within linux. The 32bit version of
Firefox crashes with flash enabled viewing my site for some reason....not
sure if its a flash bug (which I'm betting on) or a Firefox bug.
But yea, my main concern was that Firefox and Konqueror refused to render
the page at all when the flash plugin was required (even though it received
the page, and javascript console gave no errors).
On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yep...And once you figure out how to look at your local flash settings
> you'd
> be surprised at how many large corporations are already using it. BoA
> definitely does, and I know ebay just had Brad over for a talk of some
> kind.
>
>
> Very handy stuff. Shouldn't render apps useless when the plugin isn't
> installed though, I'll look into it...
>
> On 8/16/06, andyhot <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> >
> > It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies but allow much
> > more data
> > From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
> >
> > For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses this.
> >
> > But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making use of this...
> >
> > Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this on the tacos
> > list that
> > one can safely use it...
> >
> > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > > I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the dojo users list
> > > about
> > > this. I don't currently provide a config option for disabling flash
> > > storage
> > > but I can add one.
> > >
> > > I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general to see what's
> up.
> > >
> > > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using Tapestry 4.0.2,
> > >> Tacos
> > >> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on Fedora Core 5
> > >> x86_64.
> > >>
> > >> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a browser that
> > >> doesn't
> > >> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot adobe/macromedia),
> > my
> > >> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added
> disableFlashStorage:
> > >> true
> > >> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me to use my
> > >> site.
> > >>
> > >> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so, can we put
> > >> this in
> > >> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to search
> > >> endlessly
> > >> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev list that
> > >> led me
> > >> to
> > >> this solution.
> > >>
> > >> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out yet...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Andrew Ofisher
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > Open Source / J2EE Consulting
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jesse Kuhnert
> Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
>
> Open source based consulting work centered around
> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
>
>
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>.
Yep...And once you figure out how to look at your local flash settings you'd
be surprised at how many large corporations are already using it. BoA
definitely does, and I know ebay just had Brad over for a talk of some kind.
Very handy stuff. Shouldn't render apps useless when the plugin isn't
installed though, I'll look into it...
On 8/16/06, andyhot <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
>
> It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies but allow much
> more data
> From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
>
> For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses this.
>
> But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making use of this...
>
> Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this on the tacos
> list that
> one can safely use it...
>
> Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the dojo users list
> > about
> > this. I don't currently provide a config option for disabling flash
> > storage
> > but I can add one.
> >
> > I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general to see what's up.
> >
> > On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using Tapestry 4.0.2,
> >> Tacos
> >> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on Fedora Core 5
> >> x86_64.
> >>
> >> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a browser that
> >> doesn't
> >> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot adobe/macromedia),
> my
> >> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added disableFlashStorage:
> >> true
> >> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me to use my
> >> site.
> >>
> >> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so, can we put
> >> this in
> >> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to search
> >> endlessly
> >> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev list that
> >> led me
> >> to
> >> this solution.
> >>
> >> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out yet...
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Andrew Ofisher
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> Tapestry / Tacos developer
> Open Source / J2EE Consulting
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by andyhot <an...@di.uoa.gr>.
It's for persisting data in browser - similar to cookies but allow much
more data
>From 100kb to whatever the user can allow...
For the moment, no tacos and no tapestry component uses this.
But i can imagine a new cool persistance strategy making use of this...
Regarding disableFlashStorage: true, i've mentioned this on the tacos
list that
one can safely use it...
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the dojo users list
> about
> this. I don't currently provide a config option for disabling flash
> storage
> but I can add one.
>
> I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general to see what's up.
>
> On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using Tapestry 4.0.2,
>> Tacos
>> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on Fedora Core 5
>> x86_64.
>>
>> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a browser that
>> doesn't
>> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot adobe/macromedia), my
>> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added disableFlashStorage:
>> true
>> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me to use my
>> site.
>>
>> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so, can we put
>> this in
>> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to search
>> endlessly
>> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev list that
>> led me
>> to
>> this solution.
>>
>> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out yet...
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrew Ofisher
>>
>>
>
>
--
Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
Tapestry / Tacos developer
Open Source / J2EE Consulting
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Flash and Tacos?
Posted by Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>.
I remember seeing a bunch of different messages on the dojo users list about
this. I don't currently provide a config option for disabling flash storage
but I can add one.
I'll ask Brad about the flash storage stuff in general to see what's up.
On 8/16/06, Andrew Ofisher <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Not sure if anyone else experiences this...I'm using Tapestry 4.0.2, Tacos
> (latest from svn), and Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Konqueror on Fedora Core 5
> x86_64.
>
> It seems that by default, dojo requires Flash and on a browser that
> doesn't
> have flash (Anything on 64-bit linux, thanks a lot adobe/macromedia), my
> site refuses to render at all. Only after I added disableFlashStorage:
> true
> to djconfig did it render the page properly and allow me to use my site.
>
> Is this how the default behavior should be? And if so, can we put this in
> the Wiki or FAQ for others like me so they don't have to search endlessly
> for an answer...I found one obscure reference on the dev list that led me
> to
> this solution.
>
> Also, is this how 4.1 acts too? I haven't tried 4.1 out yet...
>
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Ofisher
>
>
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer
Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.