[GitHub] [incubator-mxnet] samskalicky edited a comment on issue #9686: [Discussion] MXNet 2.0 Roadmap (was: APIs that might be a good idea to break in 2.0)

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

samskalicky edited a comment on issue #9686: [Discussion] MXNet 2.0 Roadmap (was: APIs that might be a good idea to break in 2.0)
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/9686#issuecomment-513097695
 
 
   @szha I agree the third-party operator support I [proposed](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Dynamic+CustomOp+Support) could be more useful to the broader community and have been continually working on it in my spare time. I would be interested in collaborating with others to move this along faster. Should we consider that as part of the 1.6 release? 
   
   But after discussing with @zheng-da today the subgraph API + operator support does not serve the same goal as the accelerator API. Some additional external APIs (like external subgraph properties for example, or supporting compiled binaries for subgraphs) would be needed to serve the same goal.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services