You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com> on 2015/11/30 15:47:42 UTC
Lambda branch
Hi,
are we tracking changes to lambda branch with issues on JIRA?
Andrea.
Re: Lambda branch
Posted by Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de>.
oh.. sorry.. got it..
You hat to use BiConsumer for set functions..
mm:)
Am 02.12.2015 um 08:53 schrieb Michael Mosmann:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Some first thoughts on this..
>
> If we want to use lambdas for some kind of property model, the straight
> forward way of doing this looks like:
>
> SomeBean instance=new SomeBean();
> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instance::getName,instance.setName);
>
> But this will not work, if you have
>
> IModel<SomeBean> instanceModel=...;
>
> So then we could use:
> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x-> x.getName() ,(x,v) ->
> x.setName(v));
>
> It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
> reference in java8.
>
> What i would like to write is something like this:
>
> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
> ,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
>
> IMHO the correct way to solve this looks a little strange, but is from
> my point of view more consistent...
>
> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x -> x::getName, x ->
> x::setName)
>
> the Method looks like this:
>
> public <T,V> of(IModel<T> model, Function<T, Supplier<V>> getter,
> Function<T, Consumer<V>> setter);
>
> (* where Function, Supplier and Consumer must extends Serializable)
>
> am i wrong? did i miss something? because i am far from happy with this..
>
> mm:)
>
>
> Am 01.12.2015 um 12:45 schrieb andrea del bene:
>>
>>
>> Ok, I'd like to play too :) ...
>>> AFAIK we're still playing with lambdas. I still have a message I need
>>> to send to dev@ regarding lambdas...
>>>
>>> Martijn
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK not.. I thought it is something like a playground. Am i wrong?
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> Am 30. November 2015 15:47:42 MEZ, schrieb andrea del bene
>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> are we tracking changes to lambda branch with issues on JIRA?
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrea.
>>>> --
>>>> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
>>>> gesendet.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Lambda branch
Posted by andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com>.
You have ruined the magic :).
On 02/12/2015 12:21, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> You can see a fantastic example :D of instance method reference in
>> MarkupContainerTest where I filter children components with
>> Class::isInstance:
>>
>> private Stream<Component> filterChildrenStreamByClass(MarkupContainer
>> container, Class<? extends Component> filterClass)
>> {
>> return container.childrenStream().filter(filterClass::isInstance);
>> }
>>
>>
> IMO, we should be careful with this.
> This code is shorter but definitely slower than the old code.
>
>
>> Wicket on functional-steroids :)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 02/12/2015 09:54, Michael Mosmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> .. got it. Was on a wrong track:)
>>>
>>> We must use BiConsumer for setter-like methods..
>>>
>>> mm:)
>>>
>>> Am 02.12.2015 um 09:39 schrieb Sven Meier:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
>>>>> reference in java8.
>>>>>
>>>> instance::getName *is* an instance method reference.
>>>>
>>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
>>>>> ,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
>>>>>
>>>> org.wicketstuff.lambda.model.LambdaModel works fine, so what does not
>>>> compile in your example?
>>>>
>>>> Did I miss something? :P
>>>>
>>>> Sven
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02.12.2015 08:53, Michael Mosmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Some first thoughts on this..
>>>>>
>>>>> If we want to use lambdas for some kind of property model, the straight
>>>>> forward way of doing this looks like:
>>>>>
>>>>> SomeBean instance=new SomeBean();
>>>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instance::getName,instance.setName);
>>>>>
>>>>> But this will not work, if you have
>>>>>
>>>>> IModel<SomeBean> instanceModel=...;
>>>>>
>>>>> So then we could use:
>>>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x-> x.getName() ,(x,v) ->
>>>>> x.setName(v));
>>>>>
>>>>> It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
>>>>> reference in java8.
>>>>>
>>>>> What i would like to write is something like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
>>>>> ,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
>>>>>
>>>>> IMHO the correct way to solve this looks a little strange, but is from
>>>>> my point of view more consistent...
>>>>>
>>>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x -> x::getName, x ->
>>>>> x::setName)
>>>>>
>>>>> the Method looks like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> public <T,V> of(IModel<T> model, Function<T, Supplier<V>> getter,
>>>>> Function<T, Consumer<V>> setter);
>>>>>
>>>>> (* where Function, Supplier and Consumer must extends Serializable)
>>>>>
>>>>> am i wrong? did i miss something? because i am far from happy with
>>>>> this..
>>>>>
>>>>> mm:)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 01.12.2015 um 12:45 schrieb andrea del bene:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, I'd like to play too :) ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AFAIK we're still playing with lambdas. I still have a message I need
>>>>>>> to send to dev@ regarding lambdas...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> AFAIK not.. I thought it is something like a playground. Am i wrong?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 30. November 2015 15:47:42 MEZ, schrieb andrea del bene
>>>>>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> are we tracking changes to lambda branch with issues on JIRA?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
>>>>>>>> gesendet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
Re: Lambda branch
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> You can see a fantastic example :D of instance method reference in
> MarkupContainerTest where I filter children components with
> Class::isInstance:
>
> private Stream<Component> filterChildrenStreamByClass(MarkupContainer
> container, Class<? extends Component> filterClass)
> {
> return container.childrenStream().filter(filterClass::isInstance);
> }
>
>
IMO, we should be careful with this.
This code is shorter but definitely slower than the old code.
>
> Wicket on functional-steroids :)
>
>
>
> On 02/12/2015 09:54, Michael Mosmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> .. got it. Was on a wrong track:)
>>
>> We must use BiConsumer for setter-like methods..
>>
>> mm:)
>>
>> Am 02.12.2015 um 09:39 schrieb Sven Meier:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
>>>> reference in java8.
>>>>
>>> instance::getName *is* an instance method reference.
>>>
>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
>>>> ,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
>>>>
>>> org.wicketstuff.lambda.model.LambdaModel works fine, so what does not
>>> compile in your example?
>>>
>>> Did I miss something? :P
>>>
>>> Sven
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02.12.2015 08:53, Michael Mosmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Some first thoughts on this..
>>>>
>>>> If we want to use lambdas for some kind of property model, the straight
>>>> forward way of doing this looks like:
>>>>
>>>> SomeBean instance=new SomeBean();
>>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instance::getName,instance.setName);
>>>>
>>>> But this will not work, if you have
>>>>
>>>> IModel<SomeBean> instanceModel=...;
>>>>
>>>> So then we could use:
>>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x-> x.getName() ,(x,v) ->
>>>> x.setName(v));
>>>>
>>>> It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
>>>> reference in java8.
>>>>
>>>> What i would like to write is something like this:
>>>>
>>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
>>>> ,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
>>>>
>>>> IMHO the correct way to solve this looks a little strange, but is from
>>>> my point of view more consistent...
>>>>
>>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x -> x::getName, x ->
>>>> x::setName)
>>>>
>>>> the Method looks like this:
>>>>
>>>> public <T,V> of(IModel<T> model, Function<T, Supplier<V>> getter,
>>>> Function<T, Consumer<V>> setter);
>>>>
>>>> (* where Function, Supplier and Consumer must extends Serializable)
>>>>
>>>> am i wrong? did i miss something? because i am far from happy with
>>>> this..
>>>>
>>>> mm:)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 01.12.2015 um 12:45 schrieb andrea del bene:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I'd like to play too :) ...
>>>>>
>>>>>> AFAIK we're still playing with lambdas. I still have a message I need
>>>>>> to send to dev@ regarding lambdas...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AFAIK not.. I thought it is something like a playground. Am i wrong?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 30. November 2015 15:47:42 MEZ, schrieb andrea del bene
>>>>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> are we tracking changes to lambda branch with issues on JIRA?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
>>>>>>> gesendet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
Re: Lambda branch
Posted by andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com>.
You can see a fantastic example :D of instance method reference in
MarkupContainerTest where I filter children components with
Class::isInstance:
private Stream<Component> filterChildrenStreamByClass(MarkupContainer
container, Class<? extends Component> filterClass)
{
return container.childrenStream().filter(filterClass::isInstance);
}
Wicket on functional-steroids :)
On 02/12/2015 09:54, Michael Mosmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> .. got it. Was on a wrong track:)
>
> We must use BiConsumer for setter-like methods..
>
> mm:)
>
> Am 02.12.2015 um 09:39 schrieb Sven Meier:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
>>> reference in java8.
>> instance::getName *is* an instance method reference.
>>
>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
>>> ,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
>> org.wicketstuff.lambda.model.LambdaModel works fine, so what does not
>> compile in your example?
>>
>> Did I miss something? :P
>>
>> Sven
>>
>>
>> On 02.12.2015 08:53, Michael Mosmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Some first thoughts on this..
>>>
>>> If we want to use lambdas for some kind of property model, the straight
>>> forward way of doing this looks like:
>>>
>>> SomeBean instance=new SomeBean();
>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instance::getName,instance.setName);
>>>
>>> But this will not work, if you have
>>>
>>> IModel<SomeBean> instanceModel=...;
>>>
>>> So then we could use:
>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x-> x.getName() ,(x,v) ->
>>> x.setName(v));
>>>
>>> It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
>>> reference in java8.
>>>
>>> What i would like to write is something like this:
>>>
>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
>>> ,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
>>>
>>> IMHO the correct way to solve this looks a little strange, but is from
>>> my point of view more consistent...
>>>
>>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x -> x::getName, x ->
>>> x::setName)
>>>
>>> the Method looks like this:
>>>
>>> public <T,V> of(IModel<T> model, Function<T, Supplier<V>> getter,
>>> Function<T, Consumer<V>> setter);
>>>
>>> (* where Function, Supplier and Consumer must extends Serializable)
>>>
>>> am i wrong? did i miss something? because i am far from happy with this..
>>>
>>> mm:)
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 01.12.2015 um 12:45 schrieb andrea del bene:
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I'd like to play too :) ...
>>>>> AFAIK we're still playing with lambdas. I still have a message I need
>>>>> to send to dev@ regarding lambdas...
>>>>>
>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AFAIK not.. I thought it is something like a playground. Am i wrong?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 30. November 2015 15:47:42 MEZ, schrieb andrea del bene
>>>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> are we tracking changes to lambda branch with issues on JIRA?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
>>>>>> gesendet.
>>>>>
Re: Lambda branch
Posted by Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de>.
Hi,
.. got it. Was on a wrong track:)
We must use BiConsumer for setter-like methods..
mm:)
Am 02.12.2015 um 09:39 schrieb Sven Meier:
> Hi,
>
>> It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
>> reference in java8.
>
> instance::getName *is* an instance method reference.
>
>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
>> ,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
>
> org.wicketstuff.lambda.model.LambdaModel works fine, so what does not
> compile in your example?
>
> Did I miss something? :P
>
> Sven
>
>
> On 02.12.2015 08:53, Michael Mosmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Some first thoughts on this..
>>
>> If we want to use lambdas for some kind of property model, the straight
>> forward way of doing this looks like:
>>
>> SomeBean instance=new SomeBean();
>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instance::getName,instance.setName);
>>
>> But this will not work, if you have
>>
>> IModel<SomeBean> instanceModel=...;
>>
>> So then we could use:
>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x-> x.getName() ,(x,v) ->
>> x.setName(v));
>>
>> It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
>> reference in java8.
>>
>> What i would like to write is something like this:
>>
>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
>> ,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
>>
>> IMHO the correct way to solve this looks a little strange, but is from
>> my point of view more consistent...
>>
>> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x -> x::getName, x ->
>> x::setName)
>>
>> the Method looks like this:
>>
>> public <T,V> of(IModel<T> model, Function<T, Supplier<V>> getter,
>> Function<T, Consumer<V>> setter);
>>
>> (* where Function, Supplier and Consumer must extends Serializable)
>>
>> am i wrong? did i miss something? because i am far from happy with this..
>>
>> mm:)
>>
>>
>> Am 01.12.2015 um 12:45 schrieb andrea del bene:
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, I'd like to play too :) ...
>>>> AFAIK we're still playing with lambdas. I still have a message I need
>>>> to send to dev@ regarding lambdas...
>>>>
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK not.. I thought it is something like a playground. Am i wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 30. November 2015 15:47:42 MEZ, schrieb andrea del bene
>>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> are we tracking changes to lambda branch with issues on JIRA?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
>>>>> gesendet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Lambda branch
Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.
Hi,
> It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
> reference in java8.
instance::getName *is* an instance method reference.
> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
> ,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
org.wicketstuff.lambda.model.LambdaModel works fine, so what does not
compile in your example?
Did I miss something? :P
Sven
On 02.12.2015 08:53, Michael Mosmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Some first thoughts on this..
>
> If we want to use lambdas for some kind of property model, the straight
> forward way of doing this looks like:
>
> SomeBean instance=new SomeBean();
> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instance::getName,instance.setName);
>
> But this will not work, if you have
>
> IModel<SomeBean> instanceModel=...;
>
> So then we could use:
> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x-> x.getName() ,(x,v) ->
> x.setName(v));
>
> It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
> reference in java8.
>
> What i would like to write is something like this:
>
> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
> ,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
>
> IMHO the correct way to solve this looks a little strange, but is from
> my point of view more consistent...
>
> IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x -> x::getName, x ->
> x::setName)
>
> the Method looks like this:
>
> public <T,V> of(IModel<T> model, Function<T, Supplier<V>> getter,
> Function<T, Consumer<V>> setter);
>
> (* where Function, Supplier and Consumer must extends Serializable)
>
> am i wrong? did i miss something? because i am far from happy with this..
>
> mm:)
>
>
> Am 01.12.2015 um 12:45 schrieb andrea del bene:
>>
>>
>> Ok, I'd like to play too :) ...
>>> AFAIK we're still playing with lambdas. I still have a message I need
>>> to send to dev@ regarding lambdas...
>>>
>>> Martijn
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK not.. I thought it is something like a playground. Am i wrong?
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> Am 30. November 2015 15:47:42 MEZ, schrieb andrea del bene
>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> are we tracking changes to lambda branch with issues on JIRA?
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrea.
>>>> --
>>>> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
>>>> gesendet.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Lambda branch
Posted by Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de>.
Hi,
Some first thoughts on this..
If we want to use lambdas for some kind of property model, the straight
forward way of doing this looks like:
SomeBean instance=new SomeBean();
IModel<String> model=Models.of(instance::getName,instance.setName);
But this will not work, if you have
IModel<SomeBean> instanceModel=...;
So then we could use:
IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x-> x.getName() ,(x,v) ->
x.setName(v));
It is sad, that there is no way to get some kind of instance method
reference in java8.
What i would like to write is something like this:
IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, SomeBean::getName
,SomeBean::setName); // does not compile
IMHO the correct way to solve this looks a little strange, but is from
my point of view more consistent...
IModel<String> model=Models.of(instanceModel, x -> x::getName, x ->
x::setName)
the Method looks like this:
public <T,V> of(IModel<T> model, Function<T, Supplier<V>> getter,
Function<T, Consumer<V>> setter);
(* where Function, Supplier and Consumer must extends Serializable)
am i wrong? did i miss something? because i am far from happy with this..
mm:)
Am 01.12.2015 um 12:45 schrieb andrea del bene:
>
>
> Ok, I'd like to play too :) ...
>> AFAIK we're still playing with lambdas. I still have a message I need
>> to send to dev@ regarding lambdas...
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> AFAIK not.. I thought it is something like a playground. Am i wrong?
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> Am 30. November 2015 15:47:42 MEZ, schrieb andrea del bene
>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> are we tracking changes to lambda branch with issues on JIRA?
>>>>
>>>> Andrea.
>>> --
>>> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
>>> gesendet.
>>
>>
>
Re: Lambda branch
Posted by andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com>.
Ok, I'd like to play too :) ...
> AFAIK we're still playing with lambdas. I still have a message I need
> to send to dev@ regarding lambdas...
>
> Martijn
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> AFAIK not.. I thought it is something like a playground. Am i wrong?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> Am 30. November 2015 15:47:42 MEZ, schrieb andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> are we tracking changes to lambda branch with issues on JIRA?
>>>
>>> Andrea.
>> --
>> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
>
>
Re: Lambda branch
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
AFAIK we're still playing with lambdas. I still have a message I need
to send to dev@ regarding lambdas...
Martijn
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK not.. I thought it is something like a playground. Am i wrong?
>
> Michael
>
> Am 30. November 2015 15:47:42 MEZ, schrieb andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>>Hi,
>>
>>are we tracking changes to lambda branch with issues on JIRA?
>>
>>Andrea.
>
> --
> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Re: Lambda branch
Posted by Michael Mosmann <mi...@mosmann.de>.
Hi,
AFAIK not.. I thought it is something like a playground. Am i wrong?
Michael
Am 30. November 2015 15:47:42 MEZ, schrieb andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com>:
>Hi,
>
>are we tracking changes to lambda branch with issues on JIRA?
>
>Andrea.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.