You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> on 2017/10/30 20:24:43 UTC
[VOTE] KIP-208: Add SSL support to Kafka Connect REST interface
Hi,
It seems there are no more comments for this KIP, so I would like to start
the voting .
For more details about the KIP-208 go to
*https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface>*
Thanks & Regards
Jakub
Re: [VOTE] KIP-208: Add SSL support to Kafka Connect REST interface
Posted by Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io>.
+1 (binding), Thank you!!!
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:09 AM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1 from me. I just had one suggestion. I saw in the discussion thread that
> you considered allowing multiple listeners for each protocol type, but
> ultimately rejected it. Maybe to leave the door a little more open in the
> future for this, we could rename the config
> "rest.advertised.security.protocol" to "rest.advertised.security.listener"
> so that it will still make sense if we introduce a listener labeling
> approach similar to Kafka?
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Damian Guy <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jakub!
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 at 23:49 Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > We still need at least 2 more binding +1s. I think that the PR (
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4429) is shaping good. If we get
> > the
> > > votes, we should be able to make the 1.1.0 release.
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards
> > > Jakub
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
> ewen@confluent.io
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jakub,
> > > >
> > > > I left a few comments in the discuss thread, but I'll also reply here
> > > just
> > > > to bump the VOTE thread's visibility. I would like to resolve the few
> > > > comments I left, but I am effectively +1 on this, the comments I left
> > > were
> > > > mainly details.
> > > >
> > > > Committers that could help with the necessary votes would probably be
> > > Gwen
> > > > and Jason (but others more than welcome to help out too :)
> > > >
> > > > -Ewen
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just a reminder that htis is still up for vote. I think this is
> > > important
> > > > > featrue which would deserve your votes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Jakub
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It seems there are no more comments for this KIP, so I would like
> > to
> > > > > start
> > > > > > the voting .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For more details about the KIP-208 go to
> > > > > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface
> > > > > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface>*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks & Regards
> > > > > > Jakub
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-208: Add SSL support to Kafka Connect REST interface
Posted by Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>.
Hi all,
I will close the vote for this KIP. It received 4 binding +1 votes and is
now approved. Thanks to everyone for voted and discussed this.
The PR for this KIP is at https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4429
Thanks & Regards
Jakub
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> @Jason: Actually ... wouldn't it be better to name it only "
> rest.advertised.listener"? The "security" doesn't make much sense without
> the protocol. What do you think?
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> Thanks for the vote. Yeah, I think that renaming it to "
>> rest.advertised.security.listener" is good idea. Unless someone else
>> objects, I will update the KIP.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> Jakub
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me. I just had one suggestion. I saw in the discussion thread
>>> that
>>> you considered allowing multiple listeners for each protocol type, but
>>> ultimately rejected it. Maybe to leave the door a little more open in the
>>> future for this, we could rename the config
>>> "rest.advertised.security.protocol" to "rest.advertised.security.list
>>> ener"
>>> so that it will still make sense if we introduce a listener labeling
>>> approach similar to Kafka?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Damian Guy <da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks Jakub!
>>> >
>>> > +1 (binding)
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 at 23:49 Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi all,
>>> > >
>>> > > We still need at least 2 more binding +1s. I think that the PR (
>>> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4429) is shaping good. If we
>>> get
>>> > the
>>> > > votes, we should be able to make the 1.1.0 release.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks & Regards
>>> > > Jakub
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
>>> ewen@confluent.io
>>> > >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Jakub,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I left a few comments in the discuss thread, but I'll also reply
>>> here
>>> > > just
>>> > > > to bump the VOTE thread's visibility. I would like to resolve the
>>> few
>>> > > > comments I left, but I am effectively +1 on this, the comments I
>>> left
>>> > > were
>>> > > > mainly details.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Committers that could help with the necessary votes would probably
>>> be
>>> > > Gwen
>>> > > > and Jason (but others more than welcome to help out too :)
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Ewen
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hi all,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Just a reminder that htis is still up for vote. I think this is
>>> > > important
>>> > > > > featrue which would deserve your votes.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Regards
>>> > > > > Jakub
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Hi,
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > It seems there are no more comments for this KIP, so I would
>>> like
>>> > to
>>> > > > > start
>>> > > > > > the voting .
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > For more details about the KIP-208 go to
>>> > > > > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>>> > > > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface
>>> > > > > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>>> > > > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface>*
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Thanks & Regards
>>> > > > > > Jakub
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-208: Add SSL support to Kafka Connect REST interface
Posted by Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>.
@Jason: Actually ... wouldn't it be better to name it only
"rest.advertised.listener"?
The "security" doesn't make much sense without the protocol. What do you
think?
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for the vote. Yeah, I think that renaming it to "
> rest.advertised.security.listener" is good idea. Unless someone else
> objects, I will update the KIP.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Jakub
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 from me. I just had one suggestion. I saw in the discussion thread that
>> you considered allowing multiple listeners for each protocol type, but
>> ultimately rejected it. Maybe to leave the door a little more open in the
>> future for this, we could rename the config
>> "rest.advertised.security.protocol" to "rest.advertised.security.list
>> ener"
>> so that it will still make sense if we introduce a listener labeling
>> approach similar to Kafka?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jason
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Damian Guy <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Jakub!
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 at 23:49 Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > We still need at least 2 more binding +1s. I think that the PR (
>> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4429) is shaping good. If we get
>> > the
>> > > votes, we should be able to make the 1.1.0 release.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks & Regards
>> > > Jakub
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
>> ewen@confluent.io
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Jakub,
>> > > >
>> > > > I left a few comments in the discuss thread, but I'll also reply
>> here
>> > > just
>> > > > to bump the VOTE thread's visibility. I would like to resolve the
>> few
>> > > > comments I left, but I am effectively +1 on this, the comments I
>> left
>> > > were
>> > > > mainly details.
>> > > >
>> > > > Committers that could help with the necessary votes would probably
>> be
>> > > Gwen
>> > > > and Jason (but others more than welcome to help out too :)
>> > > >
>> > > > -Ewen
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Just a reminder that htis is still up for vote. I think this is
>> > > important
>> > > > > featrue which would deserve your votes.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards
>> > > > > Jakub
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > It seems there are no more comments for this KIP, so I would
>> like
>> > to
>> > > > > start
>> > > > > > the voting .
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > For more details about the KIP-208 go to
>> > > > > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>> > > > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface
>> > > > > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>> > > > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface>*
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks & Regards
>> > > > > > Jakub
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-208: Add SSL support to Kafka Connect REST interface
Posted by Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>.
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the vote. Yeah, I think that renaming it to "
rest.advertised.security.listener" is good idea. Unless someone else
objects, I will update the KIP.
Thanks & Regards
Jakub
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1 from me. I just had one suggestion. I saw in the discussion thread that
> you considered allowing multiple listeners for each protocol type, but
> ultimately rejected it. Maybe to leave the door a little more open in the
> future for this, we could rename the config
> "rest.advertised.security.protocol" to "rest.advertised.security.listener"
> so that it will still make sense if we introduce a listener labeling
> approach similar to Kafka?
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Damian Guy <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jakub!
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 at 23:49 Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > We still need at least 2 more binding +1s. I think that the PR (
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4429) is shaping good. If we get
> > the
> > > votes, we should be able to make the 1.1.0 release.
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards
> > > Jakub
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
> ewen@confluent.io
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jakub,
> > > >
> > > > I left a few comments in the discuss thread, but I'll also reply here
> > > just
> > > > to bump the VOTE thread's visibility. I would like to resolve the few
> > > > comments I left, but I am effectively +1 on this, the comments I left
> > > were
> > > > mainly details.
> > > >
> > > > Committers that could help with the necessary votes would probably be
> > > Gwen
> > > > and Jason (but others more than welcome to help out too :)
> > > >
> > > > -Ewen
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just a reminder that htis is still up for vote. I think this is
> > > important
> > > > > featrue which would deserve your votes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Jakub
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It seems there are no more comments for this KIP, so I would like
> > to
> > > > > start
> > > > > > the voting .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For more details about the KIP-208 go to
> > > > > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface
> > > > > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface>*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks & Regards
> > > > > > Jakub
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-208: Add SSL support to Kafka Connect REST interface
Posted by Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>.
+1 from me. I just had one suggestion. I saw in the discussion thread that
you considered allowing multiple listeners for each protocol type, but
ultimately rejected it. Maybe to leave the door a little more open in the
future for this, we could rename the config
"rest.advertised.security.protocol" to "rest.advertised.security.listener"
so that it will still make sense if we introduce a listener labeling
approach similar to Kafka?
Thanks,
Jason
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Damian Guy <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jakub!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 at 23:49 Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We still need at least 2 more binding +1s. I think that the PR (
> > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4429) is shaping good. If we get
> the
> > votes, we should be able to make the 1.1.0 release.
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
> > Jakub
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <ewen@confluent.io
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Jakub,
> > >
> > > I left a few comments in the discuss thread, but I'll also reply here
> > just
> > > to bump the VOTE thread's visibility. I would like to resolve the few
> > > comments I left, but I am effectively +1 on this, the comments I left
> > were
> > > mainly details.
> > >
> > > Committers that could help with the necessary votes would probably be
> > Gwen
> > > and Jason (but others more than welcome to help out too :)
> > >
> > > -Ewen
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Just a reminder that htis is still up for vote. I think this is
> > important
> > > > featrue which would deserve your votes.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Jakub
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems there are no more comments for this KIP, so I would like
> to
> > > > start
> > > > > the voting .
> > > > >
> > > > > For more details about the KIP-208 go to
> > > > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface
> > > > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface>*
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks & Regards
> > > > > Jakub
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-208: Add SSL support to Kafka Connect REST interface
Posted by Damian Guy <da...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Jakub!
+1 (binding)
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 at 23:49 Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We still need at least 2 more binding +1s. I think that the PR (
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4429) is shaping good. If we get the
> votes, we should be able to make the 1.1.0 release.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Jakub
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <ew...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Jakub,
> >
> > I left a few comments in the discuss thread, but I'll also reply here
> just
> > to bump the VOTE thread's visibility. I would like to resolve the few
> > comments I left, but I am effectively +1 on this, the comments I left
> were
> > mainly details.
> >
> > Committers that could help with the necessary votes would probably be
> Gwen
> > and Jason (but others more than welcome to help out too :)
> >
> > -Ewen
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Just a reminder that htis is still up for vote. I think this is
> important
> > > featrue which would deserve your votes.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Jakub
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > It seems there are no more comments for this KIP, so I would like to
> > > start
> > > > the voting .
> > > >
> > > > For more details about the KIP-208 go to
> > > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface
> > > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface>*
> > > >
> > > > Thanks & Regards
> > > > Jakub
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-208: Add SSL support to Kafka Connect REST interface
Posted by Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>.
Hi all,
We still need at least 2 more binding +1s. I think that the PR (
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4429) is shaping good. If we get the
votes, we should be able to make the 1.1.0 release.
Thanks & Regards
Jakub
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <ew...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> Jakub,
>
> I left a few comments in the discuss thread, but I'll also reply here just
> to bump the VOTE thread's visibility. I would like to resolve the few
> comments I left, but I am effectively +1 on this, the comments I left were
> mainly details.
>
> Committers that could help with the necessary votes would probably be Gwen
> and Jason (but others more than welcome to help out too :)
>
> -Ewen
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just a reminder that htis is still up for vote. I think this is important
> > featrue which would deserve your votes.
> >
> > Regards
> > Jakub
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It seems there are no more comments for this KIP, so I would like to
> > start
> > > the voting .
> > >
> > > For more details about the KIP-208 go to
> > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface
> > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface>*
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards
> > > Jakub
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-208: Add SSL support to Kafka Connect REST interface
Posted by Ewen Cheslack-Postava <ew...@confluent.io>.
Jakub,
I left a few comments in the discuss thread, but I'll also reply here just
to bump the VOTE thread's visibility. I would like to resolve the few
comments I left, but I am effectively +1 on this, the comments I left were
mainly details.
Committers that could help with the necessary votes would probably be Gwen
and Jason (but others more than welcome to help out too :)
-Ewen
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a reminder that htis is still up for vote. I think this is important
> featrue which would deserve your votes.
>
> Regards
> Jakub
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems there are no more comments for this KIP, so I would like to
> start
> > the voting .
> >
> > For more details about the KIP-208 go to
> > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface
> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface>*
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
> > Jakub
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-208: Add SSL support to Kafka Connect REST interface
Posted by Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>.
Hi all,
Just a reminder that htis is still up for vote. I think this is important
featrue which would deserve your votes.
Regards
Jakub
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems there are no more comments for this KIP, so I would like to start
> the voting .
>
> For more details about the KIP-208 go to
> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-208%3A+Add+SSL+support+to+Kafka+Connect+REST+interface>*
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Jakub
>