You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com> on 2003/01/15 02:20:11 UTC

AP_FTYPE_CONTENT ? (was Re: [patch] include/util_filter.h)

Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com> writes:

> Is this one any better?
> 
> Index: include/util_filter.h
> ===================================================================

[...]

> + * @param ftype The type of filter function, either ::AP_FTYPE_CONTENT
                                                                  ^^^^^^^

Should this be CONTENT or CONTENT_SET?  ap_filter_type only defines 
AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET.

-- 
Joe Schaefer

Re: AP_FTYPE_CONTENT ? (was Re: [patch] include/util_filter.h)

Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.

Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com> writes:

> Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com> writes:
> 
> > Is this one any better?
> > 
> > Index: include/util_filter.h
> > ===================================================================
> 
> [...]
> 
> > + * @param ftype The type of filter function, either ::AP_FTYPE_CONTENT
>                                                                   ^^^^^^^
> 
> Should this be CONTENT or CONTENT_SET?  ap_filter_type only defines 
> AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET.

It could be any of several types.  AP_FTYPE_CONTENT is the old name
for AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE.  Perhaps there were only those two types at one
time?

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...