You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Manoj Kumar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/07 23:51:10 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16365) Ideas for moving "mllib-local" forward

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15366978#comment-15366978 ] 

Manoj Kumar commented on SPARK-16365:
-------------------------------------

Is the ultimate aim to make mllib-local, the scikit-learn of scala?

> Ideas for moving "mllib-local" forward
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-16365
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16365
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Brainstorming
>          Components: ML
>            Reporter: Nick Pentreath
>
> Since SPARK-13944 is all done, we should all think about what the "next steps" might be for {{mllib-local}}. E.g., it could be "improve Spark's linear algebra", or "investigate how we will implement local models/pipelines in Spark", etc.
> This ticket is for comments, ideas, brainstormings and PoCs. The separation of linalg into a standalone project turned out to be significantly more complex than originally expected. So I vote we devote sufficient discussion and time to planning out the next move :)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org