You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@arrow.apache.org by Sutou Kouhei <ko...@clear-code.com> on 2023/04/11 21:50:24 UTC
[VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1
Hi,
I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
This release candidate is based on commit:
22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate.
The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
[1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
[2]: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
[3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1
Posted by Sutou Kouhei <ko...@clear-code.com>.
+1
I ran the following command line on Debian GNU/Linux sid:
VERIFY_FORCE_USE_JULIA_BINARY=1 dev/release/verify_rc.sh 2.5.1 1
Thanks,
--
kou
In <20...@clear-code.com>
"[VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1" on Wed, 12 Apr 2023 06:50:24 +0900 (JST),
Sutou Kouhei <ko...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
> Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
>
> The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
>
> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
> and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
>
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
> [2]: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
> [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1
Posted by Sutou Kouhei <ko...@clear-code.com>.
OK. I'll cut RC2 with the fix.
In <CA...@mail.gmail.com>
"Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1" on Sat, 15 Apr 2023 06:46:17 -0400,
Ben Baumgold <be...@baumgold.com> wrote:
> With PR#430 <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/pull/430> merged I can
> now give my +1 vote for this release.
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 8:24 PM Ben Baumgold <be...@baumgold.com> wrote:
>
>> I made Issue #49 <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/429> for
>> this bug and created PR#430
>> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/pull/430> as a proposed solution.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:57 PM Ben Baumgold <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I saw the same issue on my M1 Mac with Julia v1.8.5. All tests pass
>>> successfully on my x86_64 GNU/Linux box with Julia v1.8.5.
>>>
>>> On 2023/04/12 17:26:20 Eric Hanson wrote:
>>> > I saw the same issue, on Julia 1.8.5, macOS m1. I tried Rosetta as well
>>> and got a different error:
>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/425
>>> >
>>> > On 2023/04/12 07:10:14 David Li wrote:
>>> > > I was able to reproduce it just now, with the same error. If there's
>>> a patch I can apply or a flag I can set, I'm happy to give it a run in the
>>> AM.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 10:02, Jacob Quinn wrote:
>>> > > > Hmmm, I'm also on MacOS m1, but didn't have any issues running
>>> tests.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > David, is the error reproducible? We fixed an issue for this in
>>> [this
>>> > > > commit](
>>> > > >
>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/commit/6d0ac4946f062414e2b60aa3d67c2875bb2e7958
>>> ),
>>> > > > but it's possible that our check for this condition wasn't strong
>>> > > > enough or
>>> > > > something. If it's reproducible, I'd appreciate being able to do a
>>> debug
>>> > > > build for you and have it report some data around our check for
>>> this.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Jacob
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:36 PM David Li <li...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> I had an issue during verification (macOS/AArch64) [1]
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> The gist seems to be:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> ```
>>> > > >> nested task error: ArgumentError: unsafe_wrap: pointer
>>> 0x293389438
>>> > > >> is not properly aligned to 16 bytes
>>> > > >> Stacktrace:
>>> > > >> [1] #unsafe_wrap#100
>>> > > >> @ ./pointer.jl:92 [inlined]
>>> > > >> [2] unsafe_wrap
>>> > > >> @ ./pointer.jl:90 [inlined]
>>> > > >> [3] reinterp(#unused#::Type{Arrow.Decimal{2, 2, Int128}},
>>> > > >> batch::Arrow.Batch, buf::Arrow.Flatbuf.Buffer,
>>> > > >> compression::Arrow.Flatbuf.BodyCompression)
>>> > > >> @ Arrow
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:557
>>> > > >> [4] build(f::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field,
>>> #unused#::Arrow.Flatbuf.Decimal,
>>> > > >> batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64,
>>> > > >> Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64,
>>> convert::Bool)
>>> > > >> @ Arrow
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:685
>>> > > >> [5] build(field::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, batch::Arrow.Batch,
>>> > > >> rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
>>> > > >> nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
>>> > > >> @ Arrow
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:498
>>> > > >> [6] iterate(x::Arrow.VectorIterator, ::Tuple{Int64, Int64,
>>> Int64})
>>> > > >> @ Arrow
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:474
>>> > > >> [7] iterate
>>> > > >> @
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:471
>>> > > >> [inlined]
>>> > > >> [8] copyto!(dest::Vector{Any}, src::Arrow.VectorIterator)
>>> > > >> @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:946
>>> > > >> [9] _collect
>>> > > >> @ ./array.jl:713 [inlined]
>>> > > >> [10] collect
>>> > > >> @ ./array.jl:707 [inlined]
>>> > > >> [11] macro expansion
>>> > > >> @
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:376
>>> > > >> [inlined]
>>> > > >> [12] (::Arrow.var"#108#114"{Bool, Channel{Any},
>>> > > >> WorkerUtilities.OrderedSynchronizer, Dict{Int64,
>>> Arrow.DictEncoding},
>>> > > >> Arrow.Batch, Int64})()
>>> > > >> @ Arrow ./threadingconstructs.jl:341
>>> > > >> ```
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> I haven't gotten a chance to look more into it/try again.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> [1]:
>>> https://gist.github.com/lidavidm/b8f604b60c0a2cdfb04e96d4e58bdfdb
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 06:50, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>>> > > >> > Hi,
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
>>> > > >> > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > This release candidate is based on commit:
>>> > > >> > 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit
>>> tests,
>>> > > >> > and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release
>>> candidate.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
>>> > > >> > [ ] +0
>>> > > >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > [1]:
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
>>> > > >> > [2]:
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
>>> > > >> > [3]:
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1
Posted by Ben Baumgold <be...@baumgold.com>.
With PR#430 <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/pull/430> merged I can
now give my +1 vote for this release.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 8:24 PM Ben Baumgold <be...@baumgold.com> wrote:
> I made Issue #49 <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/429> for
> this bug and created PR#430
> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/pull/430> as a proposed solution.
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:57 PM Ben Baumgold <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I saw the same issue on my M1 Mac with Julia v1.8.5. All tests pass
>> successfully on my x86_64 GNU/Linux box with Julia v1.8.5.
>>
>> On 2023/04/12 17:26:20 Eric Hanson wrote:
>> > I saw the same issue, on Julia 1.8.5, macOS m1. I tried Rosetta as well
>> and got a different error:
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/425
>> >
>> > On 2023/04/12 07:10:14 David Li wrote:
>> > > I was able to reproduce it just now, with the same error. If there's
>> a patch I can apply or a flag I can set, I'm happy to give it a run in the
>> AM.
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 10:02, Jacob Quinn wrote:
>> > > > Hmmm, I'm also on MacOS m1, but didn't have any issues running
>> tests.
>> > > >
>> > > > David, is the error reproducible? We fixed an issue for this in
>> [this
>> > > > commit](
>> > > >
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/commit/6d0ac4946f062414e2b60aa3d67c2875bb2e7958
>> ),
>> > > > but it's possible that our check for this condition wasn't strong
>> > > > enough or
>> > > > something. If it's reproducible, I'd appreciate being able to do a
>> debug
>> > > > build for you and have it report some data around our check for
>> this.
>> > > >
>> > > > -Jacob
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:36 PM David Li <li...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> I had an issue during verification (macOS/AArch64) [1]
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The gist seems to be:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> ```
>> > > >> nested task error: ArgumentError: unsafe_wrap: pointer
>> 0x293389438
>> > > >> is not properly aligned to 16 bytes
>> > > >> Stacktrace:
>> > > >> [1] #unsafe_wrap#100
>> > > >> @ ./pointer.jl:92 [inlined]
>> > > >> [2] unsafe_wrap
>> > > >> @ ./pointer.jl:90 [inlined]
>> > > >> [3] reinterp(#unused#::Type{Arrow.Decimal{2, 2, Int128}},
>> > > >> batch::Arrow.Batch, buf::Arrow.Flatbuf.Buffer,
>> > > >> compression::Arrow.Flatbuf.BodyCompression)
>> > > >> @ Arrow
>> > > >>
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:557
>> > > >> [4] build(f::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field,
>> #unused#::Arrow.Flatbuf.Decimal,
>> > > >> batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64,
>> > > >> Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64,
>> convert::Bool)
>> > > >> @ Arrow
>> > > >>
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:685
>> > > >> [5] build(field::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, batch::Arrow.Batch,
>> > > >> rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
>> > > >> nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
>> > > >> @ Arrow
>> > > >>
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:498
>> > > >> [6] iterate(x::Arrow.VectorIterator, ::Tuple{Int64, Int64,
>> Int64})
>> > > >> @ Arrow
>> > > >>
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:474
>> > > >> [7] iterate
>> > > >> @
>> > > >>
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:471
>> > > >> [inlined]
>> > > >> [8] copyto!(dest::Vector{Any}, src::Arrow.VectorIterator)
>> > > >> @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:946
>> > > >> [9] _collect
>> > > >> @ ./array.jl:713 [inlined]
>> > > >> [10] collect
>> > > >> @ ./array.jl:707 [inlined]
>> > > >> [11] macro expansion
>> > > >> @
>> > > >>
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:376
>> > > >> [inlined]
>> > > >> [12] (::Arrow.var"#108#114"{Bool, Channel{Any},
>> > > >> WorkerUtilities.OrderedSynchronizer, Dict{Int64,
>> Arrow.DictEncoding},
>> > > >> Arrow.Batch, Int64})()
>> > > >> @ Arrow ./threadingconstructs.jl:341
>> > > >> ```
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I haven't gotten a chance to look more into it/try again.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [1]:
>> https://gist.github.com/lidavidm/b8f604b60c0a2cdfb04e96d4e58bdfdb
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 06:50, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>> > > >> > Hi,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
>> > > >> > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > This release candidate is based on commit:
>> > > >> > 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit
>> tests,
>> > > >> > and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release
>> candidate.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
>> > > >> > [ ] +0
>> > > >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [1]:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
>> > > >> > [2]:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
>> > > >> > [3]:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1
Posted by Ben Baumgold <be...@baumgold.com>.
I made Issue #49 <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/429> for
this bug and created PR#430 <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/pull/430> as
a proposed solution.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:57 PM Ben Baumgold <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> I saw the same issue on my M1 Mac with Julia v1.8.5. All tests pass
> successfully on my x86_64 GNU/Linux box with Julia v1.8.5.
>
> On 2023/04/12 17:26:20 Eric Hanson wrote:
> > I saw the same issue, on Julia 1.8.5, macOS m1. I tried Rosetta as well
> and got a different error:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/425
> >
> > On 2023/04/12 07:10:14 David Li wrote:
> > > I was able to reproduce it just now, with the same error. If there's a
> patch I can apply or a flag I can set, I'm happy to give it a run in the AM.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 10:02, Jacob Quinn wrote:
> > > > Hmmm, I'm also on MacOS m1, but didn't have any issues running tests.
> > > >
> > > > David, is the error reproducible? We fixed an issue for this in [this
> > > > commit](
> > > >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/commit/6d0ac4946f062414e2b60aa3d67c2875bb2e7958
> ),
> > > > but it's possible that our check for this condition wasn't strong
> > > > enough or
> > > > something. If it's reproducible, I'd appreciate being able to do a
> debug
> > > > build for you and have it report some data around our check for this.
> > > >
> > > > -Jacob
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:36 PM David Li <li...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I had an issue during verification (macOS/AArch64) [1]
> > > >>
> > > >> The gist seems to be:
> > > >>
> > > >> ```
> > > >> nested task error: ArgumentError: unsafe_wrap: pointer
> 0x293389438
> > > >> is not properly aligned to 16 bytes
> > > >> Stacktrace:
> > > >> [1] #unsafe_wrap#100
> > > >> @ ./pointer.jl:92 [inlined]
> > > >> [2] unsafe_wrap
> > > >> @ ./pointer.jl:90 [inlined]
> > > >> [3] reinterp(#unused#::Type{Arrow.Decimal{2, 2, Int128}},
> > > >> batch::Arrow.Batch, buf::Arrow.Flatbuf.Buffer,
> > > >> compression::Arrow.Flatbuf.BodyCompression)
> > > >> @ Arrow
> > > >>
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:557
> > > >> [4] build(f::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field,
> #unused#::Arrow.Flatbuf.Decimal,
> > > >> batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64,
> > > >> Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64,
> convert::Bool)
> > > >> @ Arrow
> > > >>
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:685
> > > >> [5] build(field::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, batch::Arrow.Batch,
> > > >> rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
> > > >> nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
> > > >> @ Arrow
> > > >>
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:498
> > > >> [6] iterate(x::Arrow.VectorIterator, ::Tuple{Int64, Int64,
> Int64})
> > > >> @ Arrow
> > > >>
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:474
> > > >> [7] iterate
> > > >> @
> > > >>
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:471
> > > >> [inlined]
> > > >> [8] copyto!(dest::Vector{Any}, src::Arrow.VectorIterator)
> > > >> @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:946
> > > >> [9] _collect
> > > >> @ ./array.jl:713 [inlined]
> > > >> [10] collect
> > > >> @ ./array.jl:707 [inlined]
> > > >> [11] macro expansion
> > > >> @
> > > >>
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:376
> > > >> [inlined]
> > > >> [12] (::Arrow.var"#108#114"{Bool, Channel{Any},
> > > >> WorkerUtilities.OrderedSynchronizer, Dict{Int64,
> Arrow.DictEncoding},
> > > >> Arrow.Batch, Int64})()
> > > >> @ Arrow ./threadingconstructs.jl:341
> > > >> ```
> > > >>
> > > >> I haven't gotten a chance to look more into it/try again.
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]:
> https://gist.github.com/lidavidm/b8f604b60c0a2cdfb04e96d4e58bdfdb
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 06:50, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
> > > >> > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > This release candidate is based on commit:
> > > >> > 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit
> tests,
> > > >> > and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release
> candidate.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
> > > >> > [ ] +0
> > > >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1]:
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
> > > >> > [2]:
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
> > > >> > [3]:
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1
Posted by Ben Baumgold <ba...@apache.org>.
I saw the same issue on my M1 Mac with Julia v1.8.5. All tests pass successfully on my x86_64 GNU/Linux box with Julia v1.8.5.
On 2023/04/12 17:26:20 Eric Hanson wrote:
> I saw the same issue, on Julia 1.8.5, macOS m1. I tried Rosetta as well and got a different error: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/425
>
> On 2023/04/12 07:10:14 David Li wrote:
> > I was able to reproduce it just now, with the same error. If there's a patch I can apply or a flag I can set, I'm happy to give it a run in the AM.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 10:02, Jacob Quinn wrote:
> > > Hmmm, I'm also on MacOS m1, but didn't have any issues running tests.
> > >
> > > David, is the error reproducible? We fixed an issue for this in [this
> > > commit](
> > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/commit/6d0ac4946f062414e2b60aa3d67c2875bb2e7958),
> > > but it's possible that our check for this condition wasn't strong
> > > enough or
> > > something. If it's reproducible, I'd appreciate being able to do a debug
> > > build for you and have it report some data around our check for this.
> > >
> > > -Jacob
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:36 PM David Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I had an issue during verification (macOS/AArch64) [1]
> > >>
> > >> The gist seems to be:
> > >>
> > >> ```
> > >> nested task error: ArgumentError: unsafe_wrap: pointer 0x293389438
> > >> is not properly aligned to 16 bytes
> > >> Stacktrace:
> > >> [1] #unsafe_wrap#100
> > >> @ ./pointer.jl:92 [inlined]
> > >> [2] unsafe_wrap
> > >> @ ./pointer.jl:90 [inlined]
> > >> [3] reinterp(#unused#::Type{Arrow.Decimal{2, 2, Int128}},
> > >> batch::Arrow.Batch, buf::Arrow.Flatbuf.Buffer,
> > >> compression::Arrow.Flatbuf.BodyCompression)
> > >> @ Arrow
> > >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:557
> > >> [4] build(f::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, #unused#::Arrow.Flatbuf.Decimal,
> > >> batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64,
> > >> Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
> > >> @ Arrow
> > >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:685
> > >> [5] build(field::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, batch::Arrow.Batch,
> > >> rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
> > >> nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
> > >> @ Arrow
> > >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:498
> > >> [6] iterate(x::Arrow.VectorIterator, ::Tuple{Int64, Int64, Int64})
> > >> @ Arrow
> > >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:474
> > >> [7] iterate
> > >> @
> > >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:471
> > >> [inlined]
> > >> [8] copyto!(dest::Vector{Any}, src::Arrow.VectorIterator)
> > >> @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:946
> > >> [9] _collect
> > >> @ ./array.jl:713 [inlined]
> > >> [10] collect
> > >> @ ./array.jl:707 [inlined]
> > >> [11] macro expansion
> > >> @
> > >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:376
> > >> [inlined]
> > >> [12] (::Arrow.var"#108#114"{Bool, Channel{Any},
> > >> WorkerUtilities.OrderedSynchronizer, Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
> > >> Arrow.Batch, Int64})()
> > >> @ Arrow ./threadingconstructs.jl:341
> > >> ```
> > >>
> > >> I haven't gotten a chance to look more into it/try again.
> > >>
> > >> [1]: https://gist.github.com/lidavidm/b8f604b60c0a2cdfb04e96d4e58bdfdb
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 06:50, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
> > >> > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
> > >> >
> > >> > This release candidate is based on commit:
> > >> > 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
> > >> >
> > >> > The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
> > >> >
> > >> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
> > >> > and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate.
> > >> >
> > >> > The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
> > >> >
> > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
> > >> > [ ] +0
> > >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]:
> > >> >
> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
> > >> > [2]:
> > >> >
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
> > >> > [3]:
> > >> >
> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1
Posted by Eric Hanson <er...@apache.org>.
I saw the same issue, on Julia 1.8.5, macOS m1. I tried Rosetta as well and got a different error: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/425
On 2023/04/12 07:10:14 David Li wrote:
> I was able to reproduce it just now, with the same error. If there's a patch I can apply or a flag I can set, I'm happy to give it a run in the AM.
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 10:02, Jacob Quinn wrote:
> > Hmmm, I'm also on MacOS m1, but didn't have any issues running tests.
> >
> > David, is the error reproducible? We fixed an issue for this in [this
> > commit](
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/commit/6d0ac4946f062414e2b60aa3d67c2875bb2e7958),
> > but it's possible that our check for this condition wasn't strong
> > enough or
> > something. If it's reproducible, I'd appreciate being able to do a debug
> > build for you and have it report some data around our check for this.
> >
> > -Jacob
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:36 PM David Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I had an issue during verification (macOS/AArch64) [1]
> >>
> >> The gist seems to be:
> >>
> >> ```
> >> nested task error: ArgumentError: unsafe_wrap: pointer 0x293389438
> >> is not properly aligned to 16 bytes
> >> Stacktrace:
> >> [1] #unsafe_wrap#100
> >> @ ./pointer.jl:92 [inlined]
> >> [2] unsafe_wrap
> >> @ ./pointer.jl:90 [inlined]
> >> [3] reinterp(#unused#::Type{Arrow.Decimal{2, 2, Int128}},
> >> batch::Arrow.Batch, buf::Arrow.Flatbuf.Buffer,
> >> compression::Arrow.Flatbuf.BodyCompression)
> >> @ Arrow
> >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:557
> >> [4] build(f::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, #unused#::Arrow.Flatbuf.Decimal,
> >> batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64,
> >> Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
> >> @ Arrow
> >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:685
> >> [5] build(field::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, batch::Arrow.Batch,
> >> rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
> >> nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
> >> @ Arrow
> >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:498
> >> [6] iterate(x::Arrow.VectorIterator, ::Tuple{Int64, Int64, Int64})
> >> @ Arrow
> >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:474
> >> [7] iterate
> >> @
> >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:471
> >> [inlined]
> >> [8] copyto!(dest::Vector{Any}, src::Arrow.VectorIterator)
> >> @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:946
> >> [9] _collect
> >> @ ./array.jl:713 [inlined]
> >> [10] collect
> >> @ ./array.jl:707 [inlined]
> >> [11] macro expansion
> >> @
> >> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:376
> >> [inlined]
> >> [12] (::Arrow.var"#108#114"{Bool, Channel{Any},
> >> WorkerUtilities.OrderedSynchronizer, Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
> >> Arrow.Batch, Int64})()
> >> @ Arrow ./threadingconstructs.jl:341
> >> ```
> >>
> >> I haven't gotten a chance to look more into it/try again.
> >>
> >> [1]: https://gist.github.com/lidavidm/b8f604b60c0a2cdfb04e96d4e58bdfdb
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 06:50, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
> >> > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
> >> >
> >> > This release candidate is based on commit:
> >> > 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
> >> >
> >> > The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
> >> >
> >> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
> >> > and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate.
> >> >
> >> > The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
> >> > [ ] +0
> >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
> >> >
> >> > [1]:
> >> >
> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
> >> > [2]:
> >> >
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
> >> > [3]:
> >> >
> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1
Posted by David Li <li...@apache.org>.
I was able to reproduce it just now, with the same error. If there's a patch I can apply or a flag I can set, I'm happy to give it a run in the AM.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 10:02, Jacob Quinn wrote:
> Hmmm, I'm also on MacOS m1, but didn't have any issues running tests.
>
> David, is the error reproducible? We fixed an issue for this in [this
> commit](
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/commit/6d0ac4946f062414e2b60aa3d67c2875bb2e7958),
> but it's possible that our check for this condition wasn't strong
> enough or
> something. If it's reproducible, I'd appreciate being able to do a debug
> build for you and have it report some data around our check for this.
>
> -Jacob
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:36 PM David Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I had an issue during verification (macOS/AArch64) [1]
>>
>> The gist seems to be:
>>
>> ```
>> nested task error: ArgumentError: unsafe_wrap: pointer 0x293389438
>> is not properly aligned to 16 bytes
>> Stacktrace:
>> [1] #unsafe_wrap#100
>> @ ./pointer.jl:92 [inlined]
>> [2] unsafe_wrap
>> @ ./pointer.jl:90 [inlined]
>> [3] reinterp(#unused#::Type{Arrow.Decimal{2, 2, Int128}},
>> batch::Arrow.Batch, buf::Arrow.Flatbuf.Buffer,
>> compression::Arrow.Flatbuf.BodyCompression)
>> @ Arrow
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:557
>> [4] build(f::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, #unused#::Arrow.Flatbuf.Decimal,
>> batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64,
>> Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
>> @ Arrow
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:685
>> [5] build(field::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, batch::Arrow.Batch,
>> rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
>> nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
>> @ Arrow
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:498
>> [6] iterate(x::Arrow.VectorIterator, ::Tuple{Int64, Int64, Int64})
>> @ Arrow
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:474
>> [7] iterate
>> @
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:471
>> [inlined]
>> [8] copyto!(dest::Vector{Any}, src::Arrow.VectorIterator)
>> @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:946
>> [9] _collect
>> @ ./array.jl:713 [inlined]
>> [10] collect
>> @ ./array.jl:707 [inlined]
>> [11] macro expansion
>> @
>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:376
>> [inlined]
>> [12] (::Arrow.var"#108#114"{Bool, Channel{Any},
>> WorkerUtilities.OrderedSynchronizer, Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
>> Arrow.Batch, Int64})()
>> @ Arrow ./threadingconstructs.jl:341
>> ```
>>
>> I haven't gotten a chance to look more into it/try again.
>>
>> [1]: https://gist.github.com/lidavidm/b8f604b60c0a2cdfb04e96d4e58bdfdb
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 06:50, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
>> > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
>> >
>> > This release candidate is based on commit:
>> > 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
>> >
>> > The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
>> >
>> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
>> > and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate.
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
>> > [ ] +0
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
>> >
>> > [1]:
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
>> > [2]:
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
>> > [3]:
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
>>
Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1
Posted by Jacob Quinn <qu...@gmail.com>.
Hmmm, I'm also on MacOS m1, but didn't have any issues running tests.
David, is the error reproducible? We fixed an issue for this in [this
commit](
https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/commit/6d0ac4946f062414e2b60aa3d67c2875bb2e7958),
but it's possible that our check for this condition wasn't strong enough or
something. If it's reproducible, I'd appreciate being able to do a debug
build for you and have it report some data around our check for this.
-Jacob
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:36 PM David Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> I had an issue during verification (macOS/AArch64) [1]
>
> The gist seems to be:
>
> ```
> nested task error: ArgumentError: unsafe_wrap: pointer 0x293389438
> is not properly aligned to 16 bytes
> Stacktrace:
> [1] #unsafe_wrap#100
> @ ./pointer.jl:92 [inlined]
> [2] unsafe_wrap
> @ ./pointer.jl:90 [inlined]
> [3] reinterp(#unused#::Type{Arrow.Decimal{2, 2, Int128}},
> batch::Arrow.Batch, buf::Arrow.Flatbuf.Buffer,
> compression::Arrow.Flatbuf.BodyCompression)
> @ Arrow
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:557
> [4] build(f::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, #unused#::Arrow.Flatbuf.Decimal,
> batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64,
> Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
> @ Arrow
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:685
> [5] build(field::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, batch::Arrow.Batch,
> rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
> nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
> @ Arrow
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:498
> [6] iterate(x::Arrow.VectorIterator, ::Tuple{Int64, Int64, Int64})
> @ Arrow
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:474
> [7] iterate
> @
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:471
> [inlined]
> [8] copyto!(dest::Vector{Any}, src::Arrow.VectorIterator)
> @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:946
> [9] _collect
> @ ./array.jl:713 [inlined]
> [10] collect
> @ ./array.jl:707 [inlined]
> [11] macro expansion
> @
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:376
> [inlined]
> [12] (::Arrow.var"#108#114"{Bool, Channel{Any},
> WorkerUtilities.OrderedSynchronizer, Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
> Arrow.Batch, Int64})()
> @ Arrow ./threadingconstructs.jl:341
> ```
>
> I haven't gotten a chance to look more into it/try again.
>
> [1]: https://gist.github.com/lidavidm/b8f604b60c0a2cdfb04e96d4e58bdfdb
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 06:50, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
> > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
> >
> > This release candidate is based on commit:
> > 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
> >
> > The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
> >
> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
> > and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
> >
> > [1]:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
> > [2]:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
> > [3]:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
>
Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1
Posted by David Li <li...@apache.org>.
I had an issue during verification (macOS/AArch64) [1]
The gist seems to be:
```
nested task error: ArgumentError: unsafe_wrap: pointer 0x293389438 is not properly aligned to 16 bytes
Stacktrace:
[1] #unsafe_wrap#100
@ ./pointer.jl:92 [inlined]
[2] unsafe_wrap
@ ./pointer.jl:90 [inlined]
[3] reinterp(#unused#::Type{Arrow.Decimal{2, 2, Int128}}, batch::Arrow.Batch, buf::Arrow.Flatbuf.Buffer, compression::Arrow.Flatbuf.BodyCompression)
@ Arrow ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:557
[4] build(f::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, #unused#::Arrow.Flatbuf.Decimal, batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
@ Arrow ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:685
[5] build(field::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
@ Arrow ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:498
[6] iterate(x::Arrow.VectorIterator, ::Tuple{Int64, Int64, Int64})
@ Arrow ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:474
[7] iterate
@ ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:471 [inlined]
[8] copyto!(dest::Vector{Any}, src::Arrow.VectorIterator)
@ Base ./abstractarray.jl:946
[9] _collect
@ ./array.jl:713 [inlined]
[10] collect
@ ./array.jl:707 [inlined]
[11] macro expansion
@ ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:376 [inlined]
[12] (::Arrow.var"#108#114"{Bool, Channel{Any}, WorkerUtilities.OrderedSynchronizer, Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding}, Arrow.Batch, Int64})()
@ Arrow ./threadingconstructs.jl:341
```
I haven't gotten a chance to look more into it/try again.
[1]: https://gist.github.com/lidavidm/b8f604b60c0a2cdfb04e96d4e58bdfdb
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 06:50, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
> Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
>
> The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
>
> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
> and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
>
> [1]:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
> [2]:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
> [3]:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify