You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Stefan Zoerner <sz...@apache.org> on 2007/11/12 20:54:09 UTC
Re: [VOTE] [ApacheDS] [BigBang] Should we check point what we have?
Hi Alex!
Is this vote still open?
If yes, we (you?) should close it.
Thanks in advance,
Stefan Z.
Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think we can say we're finished with Phase I of the the big bang plan
> [0].
>
> Emmanuel planted the seed in my head that we might consider replacing the
> current trunk with a copy of the big bang branch before moving forward on
> Phase II. He made some excellent points:
>
> o this gives developers a chance to see the changes
> o allows for an interim release if the team wants to release 1.5.2
> o gives the team a chance to start documenting some changes
> o prevents stalling somewhat as this refactoring is underway
>
> These are all good points. Personally I'm strapped on time trying to
> work on
> various things such as Triplesec, the refactoring in bigbang, and my day
> job.
> So I may not have enough time for helping out in a release but I'm fully
> supportive
> of one.
>
> Copying big bang over to trunk check points the refactoring at a
> community level:
> heck svn automatically checkpoints for us and we can tag things as they
> are now
> too. But the point is it checkpoints the current state and sends a
> clear message
> about where we are and what we can do before we do much with more in the
> bigbang.
> Who knows Phase II might become a big mess and/or we might not like
> where we
> get to. We may decide to keep things as they are after Phase I.
>
> Should we replace trunk now with the bigbang?
>
> [ ] +1 - replace trunk with big bang in present state
> [ ] +/-0 - don't care
> [ ] -1 - no not now
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> ---------------------
>
> [0] -
> http://www.nabble.com/-ApacheDS---BigBang--Status-Report-tf4585474.html#a13089517
> <http://www.nabble.com/-ApacheDS---BigBang--Status-Report-tf4585474.html#a13089517>
---8<---
Stefan Zoerner (szoerner@apache.org)
Committer :: PMC Member
Apache Directory Project
http://directory.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [ApacheDS] [BigBang] Should we check point what we have?
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Alex Karasulu wrote:
> I was thinking we can start after we get automatic builds up and running again.
>
> Also I just found some issues in the bigbang with what djencks did
> with this xbean stuff. I'm trying to figure out how to fix that.
> Problem is he does not think about the full picture so a bunch of
> things are broken with the installers and simple command line starts.
>
Ok then. Fix bigbang, I will check the CI server. When we are done, we
can merge...
> Alex
>
> On Nov 20, 2007 4:51 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>>> ahh yeah thanks...
>>>
>>> This vote is closed and seems to pass since we have 3 +1 votes and 2
>>> +0 votes. Let's do it.
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>> Could we start soon ? Otherwise we will have a bigbang for ever ;)
>>
>> --
>> --
>> cordialement, regards,
>> Emmanuel Lécharny
>> www.iktek.com
>> directory.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [ApacheDS] [BigBang] Should we check point what we have?
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
I was thinking we can start after we get automatic builds up and running again.
Also I just found some issues in the bigbang with what djencks did
with this xbean stuff. I'm trying to figure out how to fix that.
Problem is he does not think about the full picture so a bunch of
things are broken with the installers and simple command line starts.
Alex
On Nov 20, 2007 4:51 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > ahh yeah thanks...
> >
> > This vote is closed and seems to pass since we have 3 +1 votes and 2
> > +0 votes. Let's do it.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> Could we start soon ? Otherwise we will have a bigbang for ever ;)
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] [ApacheDS] [BigBang] Should we check point what we have?
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Alex Karasulu wrote:
> ahh yeah thanks...
>
> This vote is closed and seems to pass since we have 3 +1 votes and 2
> +0 votes. Let's do it.
>
> Alex
>
Could we start soon ? Otherwise we will have a bigbang for ever ;)
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [ApacheDS] [BigBang] Should we check point what we have?
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
ahh yeah thanks...
This vote is closed and seems to pass since we have 3 +1 votes and 2
+0 votes. Let's do it.
Alex
On Nov 12, 2007 2:54 PM, Stefan Zoerner <sz...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Alex!
>
> Is this vote still open?
> If yes, we (you?) should close it.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Stefan Z.
>
>
> Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think we can say we're finished with Phase I of the the big bang plan
> > [0].
> >
> > Emmanuel planted the seed in my head that we might consider replacing the
> > current trunk with a copy of the big bang branch before moving forward on
> > Phase II. He made some excellent points:
> >
> > o this gives developers a chance to see the changes
> > o allows for an interim release if the team wants to release 1.5.2
> > o gives the team a chance to start documenting some changes
> > o prevents stalling somewhat as this refactoring is underway
> >
> > These are all good points. Personally I'm strapped on time trying to
> > work on
> > various things such as Triplesec, the refactoring in bigbang, and my day
> > job.
> > So I may not have enough time for helping out in a release but I'm fully
> > supportive
> > of one.
> >
> > Copying big bang over to trunk check points the refactoring at a
> > community level:
> > heck svn automatically checkpoints for us and we can tag things as they
> > are now
> > too. But the point is it checkpoints the current state and sends a
> > clear message
> > about where we are and what we can do before we do much with more in the
> > bigbang.
> > Who knows Phase II might become a big mess and/or we might not like
> > where we
> > get to. We may decide to keep things as they are after Phase I.
> >
> > Should we replace trunk now with the bigbang?
> >
> > [ ] +1 - replace trunk with big bang in present state
> > [ ] +/-0 - don't care
> > [ ] -1 - no not now
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > ---------------------
> >
> > [0] -
> > http://www.nabble.com/-ApacheDS---BigBang--Status-Report-tf4585474.html#a13089517
> > <http://www.nabble.com/-ApacheDS---BigBang--Status-Report-tf4585474.html#a13089517>
>
>
> ---8<---
>
> Stefan Zoerner (szoerner@apache.org)
> Committer :: PMC Member
>
> Apache Directory Project
> http://directory.apache.org
>
>