You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to netcat@netbeans.apache.org by Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com> on 2020/11/13 07:51:31 UTC
Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Dear Apache NetBeans community,
The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
12.2 is available.
This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
language server after change of JDK home
as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode Extension,
so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
**The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are the
following:
- The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on the
developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern about
the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as those
are considered blocking.
- If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
- Mark the milestone as: 12.2
- Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when the
issue is fixed.
I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the master
as well:
- If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
- Add the usual reviewers
- API/SPI changes are fine
- Structural changes are welcome if needed
If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
release from 15th of November!
The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
Link to the binary zip:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
SHA512:
5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
The sources are here:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
SHA512:
9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
Release schedule :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
Bug Priority Guidelines :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
Thank you for your contributions!
--
Laszlo Kishalmi
Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Jaroslav Tulach <ja...@gmail.com>.
The VSCode plugin built on 12.2-rc2 sources is available at
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-vscode/177/artifact/
java/java.lsp.server/build/apache-netbeans-java-12.2.177.vsix
and is ready for testing. We know no blocker, so let's aim at Nov 15, cutting
date!
-jt
> Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>
> The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
> 12.2 is available.
>
> This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
> language server after change of JDK home
>
> as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>
> Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode Extension,
> so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>
>
> **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>
> As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
> build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>
> Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are the
> following:
> - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on the
> developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern about
> the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as those
> are considered blocking.
> - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
> - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
> - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>
> That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when the
> issue is fixed.
>
> I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the master
> as well:
> - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
> - Add the usual reviewers
> - API/SPI changes are fine
> - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>
> If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
> release from 15th of November!
>
>
> The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/
> release122/17/artifact/dist
>
>
> Link to the binary zip:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/
> release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>
> SHA512:
> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb
> 1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>
> The sources are here:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/
> release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>
> SHA512:
> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df
> 379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>
> Release schedule :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>
> Bug Priority Guidelines :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>
>
> Thank you for your contributions!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Jaroslav Tulach <ja...@gmail.com>.
> So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
> Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
> wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
+1
> These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
> act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
+1
> Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
> important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
> after it is released.
>
> So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
+1
-jt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Makes sense to me, thanks.
Gj
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:58 PM Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Well,
>
> So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
> Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
> wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>
> As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
> issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does not
> work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip distribution.
>
> These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to act
> on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>
> Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
> important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right after
> it is released.
>
> So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>
>
> On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
>
> I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
> release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>
> Gj
>
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>>
>> The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
>> 12.2 is available.
>>
>> This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
>> language server after change of JDK home
>>
>> as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>>
>> Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode Extension,
>> so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>>
>>
>> **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>>
>> As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
>> build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>>
>> Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are the
>> following:
>> - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on the
>> developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern about
>> the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as those
>> are considered blocking.
>> - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>> - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>> - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>>
>> That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when the
>> issue is fixed.
>>
>> I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the master
>> as well:
>> - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>> - Add the usual reviewers
>> - API/SPI changes are fine
>> - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>>
>> If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
>> release from 15th of November!
>>
>>
>> The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>>
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>>
>>
>> Link to the binary zip:
>>
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>>
>> SHA512:
>>
>> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>>
>> The sources are here:
>>
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>>
>> SHA512:
>>
>> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>>
>> Release schedule :
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>>
>> Bug Priority Guidelines :
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your contributions!
>>
>> --
>> Laszlo Kishalmi
>> Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>
>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>
>>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Michal Konrad Owsiak <mi...@owsiak.org>.
I have tried latest release of NB with JDK
> java -version
java version "11.0.4" 2019-07-16 LTS
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+10-LTS)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.4+10-LTS, mixed mode)
and my personal NetBeans wrapper: http://nb.owsiak.org
It works just fine. NetBeans asks for permissions during first startup,
and then I can access both Desktop and Documents without any issues.
Cheers
Michal
Christian Oyarzun wrote on 13/11/2020 17:19:
> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>
> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
> under macOS
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK 11.0.9
> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be that
> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>
> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Michal Konrad Owsiak <mi...@owsiak.org>.
I have tried latest release of NB with JDK
> java -version
java version "11.0.4" 2019-07-16 LTS
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+10-LTS)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.4+10-LTS, mixed mode)
and my personal NetBeans wrapper: http://nb.owsiak.org
It works just fine. NetBeans asks for permissions during first startup,
and then I can access both Desktop and Documents without any issues.
Cheers
Michal
Christian Oyarzun wrote on 13/11/2020 17:19:
> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>
> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
> under macOS
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK 11.0.9
> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be that
> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>
> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by "Jack W." <so...@gmail.com>.
Re: Big Sur
I assume this has been said but there doesn't seem to be any problem with
just unpacking the zip on MacOS Big Sur and running it from one's directory
tree.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 3:02 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wouldn’t matter, java_home doesn’t work at all, at least not in any
> reasonable way, on Big Sur. Regardless of the arguments. At least I can’t
> get it to do anything useful on my install of Big Sur.
>
--
---
Jack Woehr # Woehr's Asymptote: The ratio of the time spent
Box 51, Golden CO 80402 # administering productivity software over the time
http://www.softwoehr.com # saved by said software eventually approximates 1.
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by "Jack W." <so...@gmail.com>.
Re: Big Sur
I assume this has been said but there doesn't seem to be any problem with
just unpacking the zip on MacOS Big Sur and running it from one's directory
tree.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 3:02 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wouldn’t matter, java_home doesn’t work at all, at least not in any
> reasonable way, on Big Sur. Regardless of the arguments. At least I can’t
> get it to do anything useful on my install of Big Sur.
>
--
---
Jack Woehr # Woehr's Asymptote: The ratio of the time spent
Box 51, Golden CO 80402 # administering productivity software over the time
http://www.softwoehr.com # saved by said software eventually approximates 1.
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com>.
There is currently no point in running java_home at all on Big Sur. It just returns what is already in the JAVA_HOME environment variable, or nothing. It might be best to simply check if the OS is Big Sur and skip running java_home.
And complain to Apple that they’ve broken things.
Scott
> On Nov 17, 2020, at 9:33 AM, Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>
>
> I installed Big Sur on a VM with JDK 8, 11, and 15 to test java_home.
>
> % /usr/libexec/java_home -V
> Matching Java Virtual Machines (3):
> 15.0.1 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 15" /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
> 11.0.9 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 11" /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
> 1.8.0_275 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 8" /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-8.jdk/Contents/Home
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
>
>
> If you have the environment variable JAVA_HOME set, java_home will return the value of JAVA_HOME regardless of the arguments provided to java_home.
>
> % export JAVA_HOME=/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
> % /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
> %
>
>
> If JAVA_HOME is set to an empty string then an empty string is returned from java_home.
>
> % export JAVA_HOME=
> % /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
> %
>
> If JAVA_HOME is not set and you use a '+' in the '-v' and also have '--failfast' it will not find a JDK.
>
> % unset JAVA_HOME
> % /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
> The operation couldn’t be completed. Unable to locate a Java Runtime that supports (null).
> Please visit http://www.java.com for information on installing Java.
>
> The '-v' with a '+' works without '--failfast' but also returns the same as not using '-v'
>
> % unset JAVA_HOME
> % /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
> % /usr/libexec/java_home
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
> %
>
>
>
> Given this information, I would say nbexec should be changed as follows.
>
> % git diff
> diff --git a/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec b/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
> index ca7d16b13d..7be6a2f136 100644
> --- a/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
> +++ b/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
> @@ -140,10 +140,13 @@ if [ -z "$jdkhome" ] ; then
> # try to find JDK
> case "`uname`" in
> Darwin*)
> + # check if JAVA_HOME is empty string since java_home will return the value of JAVA_HOME
> + if [ -z "$JAVA_HOME" ]; then
> + unset JAVA_HOME
> + fi
> # read Java Preferences
> if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> - jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+ --failfast`
> -
> + jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8+`
> # JDK1.8 as a fallback
> elif [ -f "/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java" ] ; then
> jdkhome="/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0.jdk/Contents/Home"
>
>
>
> --Christian
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:02 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wouldn’t matter, java_home doesn’t work at all, at least not in any reasonable way, on Big Sur. Regardless of the arguments. At least I can’t get it to do anything useful on my install of Big Sur.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>>> On Nov 16, 2020, at 10:53 AM, Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> I believe part of the problem is in nbexec. While we fixed the installer to remove /usr/libexec/java_home argument changes in Big Sur, we missed it in nbexec.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/e9143f9d2057fe66e0bffd5db955cf228d364346
>>>
>>> % git grep java_home
>>> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String BEA_JAVA_HOME="bea_java_home"; // NOI18N
>>> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String SUN_JAVA_HOME="sun_java_home"; // NOI18N
>>> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String JAVA_HOME ="java_home"; // NOI18N
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/postinstall/postinstall:DEFAULT_JDK_HOME=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/unpack200_to_dir.sh:javapath=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8`
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: var res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: var res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/pack200.sh:javaPath=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8`
>>> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
>>> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: javaOnMacHome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --failfast`
>>> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
>>> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+ --failfast`
>>>
>>> --Christian
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:45 PM Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> So far, the only problem I've been able to identify via interactions in a NetBeans issue re Big Sur is that it seems that during the installation of Big Sur, various permissions appear to be overwritten so that the NetBeans launcher can't launch NetBeans.
>>>>
>>>> So, just check the permissions and, to verify further, use the command line with 'sudo' to run NetBeans, which, if it succeeds, tells you that your permissions are messed up.
>>>>
>>>> Gj
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:43 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling /usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home folder for one of the JDKs.
>>>>>
>>>>> I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple (the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give them a nudge.
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>>>>>> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
>>>>>> under macOS
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
>>>>>> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK 11.0.9
>>>>>> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
>>>>>> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be that
>>>>>> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
>>>>>> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
>>>>>> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
>>>>>> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Well,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
>>>>>> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
>>>>>> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
>>>>>> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
>>>>>> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
>>>>>> > distribution.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
>>>>>> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
>>>>>> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
>>>>>> > after it is released.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
>>>>>> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Gj
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>>>> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
>>>>>> > > 12.2 is available.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
>>>>>> > > language server after change of JDK home
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
>>>>>> > > Extension,
>>>>>> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
>>>>>> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
>>>>>> > > the
>>>>>> > > following:
>>>>>> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
>>>>>> > > the
>>>>>> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
>>>>>> > > about
>>>>>> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
>>>>>> > > those
>>>>>> > > are considered blocking.
>>>>>> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>>>>>> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>>>>>> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
>>>>>> > > the
>>>>>> > > issue is fixed.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
>>>>>> > > master
>>>>>> > > as well:
>>>>>> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>>>>>> > > - Add the usual reviewers
>>>>>> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
>>>>>> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
>>>>>> > > release from 15th of November!
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Link to the binary zip:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > The sources are here:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Release schedule :
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Thank you for your contributions!
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > --
>>>>>> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>>>> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>>>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>>>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> >
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com>.
There is currently no point in running java_home at all on Big Sur. It just returns what is already in the JAVA_HOME environment variable, or nothing. It might be best to simply check if the OS is Big Sur and skip running java_home.
And complain to Apple that they’ve broken things.
Scott
> On Nov 17, 2020, at 9:33 AM, Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>
>
> I installed Big Sur on a VM with JDK 8, 11, and 15 to test java_home.
>
> % /usr/libexec/java_home -V
> Matching Java Virtual Machines (3):
> 15.0.1 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 15" /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
> 11.0.9 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 11" /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
> 1.8.0_275 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 8" /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-8.jdk/Contents/Home
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
>
>
> If you have the environment variable JAVA_HOME set, java_home will return the value of JAVA_HOME regardless of the arguments provided to java_home.
>
> % export JAVA_HOME=/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
> % /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
> %
>
>
> If JAVA_HOME is set to an empty string then an empty string is returned from java_home.
>
> % export JAVA_HOME=
> % /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
> %
>
> If JAVA_HOME is not set and you use a '+' in the '-v' and also have '--failfast' it will not find a JDK.
>
> % unset JAVA_HOME
> % /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
> The operation couldn’t be completed. Unable to locate a Java Runtime that supports (null).
> Please visit http://www.java.com for information on installing Java.
>
> The '-v' with a '+' works without '--failfast' but also returns the same as not using '-v'
>
> % unset JAVA_HOME
> % /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
> % /usr/libexec/java_home
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
> %
>
>
>
> Given this information, I would say nbexec should be changed as follows.
>
> % git diff
> diff --git a/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec b/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
> index ca7d16b13d..7be6a2f136 100644
> --- a/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
> +++ b/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
> @@ -140,10 +140,13 @@ if [ -z "$jdkhome" ] ; then
> # try to find JDK
> case "`uname`" in
> Darwin*)
> + # check if JAVA_HOME is empty string since java_home will return the value of JAVA_HOME
> + if [ -z "$JAVA_HOME" ]; then
> + unset JAVA_HOME
> + fi
> # read Java Preferences
> if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> - jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+ --failfast`
> -
> + jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8+`
> # JDK1.8 as a fallback
> elif [ -f "/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java" ] ; then
> jdkhome="/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0.jdk/Contents/Home"
>
>
>
> --Christian
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:02 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wouldn’t matter, java_home doesn’t work at all, at least not in any reasonable way, on Big Sur. Regardless of the arguments. At least I can’t get it to do anything useful on my install of Big Sur.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>>> On Nov 16, 2020, at 10:53 AM, Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> I believe part of the problem is in nbexec. While we fixed the installer to remove /usr/libexec/java_home argument changes in Big Sur, we missed it in nbexec.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/e9143f9d2057fe66e0bffd5db955cf228d364346
>>>
>>> % git grep java_home
>>> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String BEA_JAVA_HOME="bea_java_home"; // NOI18N
>>> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String SUN_JAVA_HOME="sun_java_home"; // NOI18N
>>> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String JAVA_HOME ="java_home"; // NOI18N
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/postinstall/postinstall:DEFAULT_JDK_HOME=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/unpack200_to_dir.sh:javapath=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8`
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: var res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: var res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
>>> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/pack200.sh:javaPath=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8`
>>> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
>>> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: javaOnMacHome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --failfast`
>>> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
>>> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+ --failfast`
>>>
>>> --Christian
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:45 PM Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> So far, the only problem I've been able to identify via interactions in a NetBeans issue re Big Sur is that it seems that during the installation of Big Sur, various permissions appear to be overwritten so that the NetBeans launcher can't launch NetBeans.
>>>>
>>>> So, just check the permissions and, to verify further, use the command line with 'sudo' to run NetBeans, which, if it succeeds, tells you that your permissions are messed up.
>>>>
>>>> Gj
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:43 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling /usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home folder for one of the JDKs.
>>>>>
>>>>> I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple (the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give them a nudge.
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>>>>>> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
>>>>>> under macOS
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
>>>>>> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK 11.0.9
>>>>>> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
>>>>>> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be that
>>>>>> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
>>>>>> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
>>>>>> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
>>>>>> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Well,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
>>>>>> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
>>>>>> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
>>>>>> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
>>>>>> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
>>>>>> > distribution.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
>>>>>> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
>>>>>> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
>>>>>> > after it is released.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
>>>>>> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Gj
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>>>> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
>>>>>> > > 12.2 is available.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
>>>>>> > > language server after change of JDK home
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
>>>>>> > > Extension,
>>>>>> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
>>>>>> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
>>>>>> > > the
>>>>>> > > following:
>>>>>> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
>>>>>> > > the
>>>>>> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
>>>>>> > > about
>>>>>> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
>>>>>> > > those
>>>>>> > > are considered blocking.
>>>>>> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>>>>>> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>>>>>> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
>>>>>> > > the
>>>>>> > > issue is fixed.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
>>>>>> > > master
>>>>>> > > as well:
>>>>>> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>>>>>> > > - Add the usual reviewers
>>>>>> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
>>>>>> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
>>>>>> > > release from 15th of November!
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Link to the binary zip:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > The sources are here:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Release schedule :
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Thank you for your contributions!
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > --
>>>>>> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>>>> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>>>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>>>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> >
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net>.
I installed Big Sur on a VM with JDK 8, 11, and 15 to test java_home.
% /usr/libexec/java_home -V
Matching Java Virtual Machines (3):
15.0.1 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 15"
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
11.0.9 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 11"
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
1.8.0_275 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 8"
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-8.jdk/Contents/Home
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
If you have the environment variable JAVA_HOME set, java_home will return
the value of JAVA_HOME regardless of the arguments provided to java_home.
% export
JAVA_HOME=/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
% /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
%
If JAVA_HOME is set to an empty string then an empty string is returned
from java_home.
% export JAVA_HOME=
% /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
%
If JAVA_HOME is not set and you use a '+' in the '-v' and also have
'--failfast' it will not find a JDK.
% unset JAVA_HOME
% /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
The operation couldn’t be completed. Unable to locate a Java Runtime that
supports (null).
Please visit http://www.java.com for information on installing Java.
The '-v' with a '+' works without '--failfast' but also returns the same as
not using '-v'
% unset JAVA_HOME
% /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
% /usr/libexec/java_home
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
%
Given this information, I would say nbexec should be changed as follows.
% git diff
diff --git a/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
b/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
index ca7d16b13d..7be6a2f136 100644
--- a/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
+++ b/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
@@ -140,10 +140,13 @@ if [ -z "$jdkhome" ] ; then
# try to find JDK
case "`uname`" in
Darwin*)
+ # check if JAVA_HOME is empty string since java_home will
return the value of JAVA_HOME
+ if [ -z "$JAVA_HOME" ]; then
+ unset JAVA_HOME
+ fi
# read Java Preferences
if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
- jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+
--failfast`
-
+ jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8+`
# JDK1.8 as a fallback
elif [ -f
"/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java" ] ;
then
jdkhome="/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0.jdk/Contents/Home"
--Christian
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:02 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wouldn’t matter, java_home doesn’t work at all, at least not in any
> reasonable way, on Big Sur. Regardless of the arguments. At least I can’t
> get it to do anything useful on my install of Big Sur.
>
> Scott
>
> On Nov 16, 2020, at 10:53 AM, Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>
>
> I believe part of the problem is in nbexec. While we fixed the installer
> to remove /usr/libexec/java_home argument changes in Big Sur, we missed it
> in nbexec.
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/e9143f9d2057fe66e0bffd5db955cf228d364346
>
> % git grep java_home
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
> public static final String BEA_JAVA_HOME="bea_java_home"; //
> NOI18N
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
> public static final String SUN_JAVA_HOME="sun_java_home"; //
> NOI18N
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
> public static final String JAVA_HOME ="java_home"; //
> NOI18N
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: if [ -x
> "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh:
> jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
>
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/postinstall/postinstall:DEFAULT_JDK_HOME=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/unpack200_to_dir.sh:javapath=`/usr/libexec/java_home
> --version 1.8`
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist:
> if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: var
> res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist:
> if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: var res =
> system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/pack200.sh:javaPath=`/usr/libexec/java_home
> --version 1.8`
> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: if [ -x
> "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh:
> javaOnMacHome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --failfast`
> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: if [ -x
> "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec:
> jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+ --failfast`
>
> --Christian
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:45 PM Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> So far, the only problem I've been able to identify via interactions in a
>> NetBeans issue re Big Sur is that it seems that during the installation of
>> Big Sur, various permissions appear to be overwritten so that the NetBeans
>> launcher can't launch NetBeans.
>>
>> So, just check the permissions and, to verify further, use the command
>> line with 'sudo' to run NetBeans, which, if it succeeds, tells you that
>> your permissions are messed up.
>>
>> Gj
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:43 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling
>>> /usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken
>>> under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME
>>> environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the
>>> java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't
>>> already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to
>>> list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home
>>> folder for one of the JDKs.
>>>
>>> I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report
>>> seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were
>>> doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple
>>> issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple
>>> (the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give
>>> them a nudge.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>>>>
>>>> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and
>>>> folder
>>>> under macOS
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
>>>> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK
>>>> 11.0.9
>>>> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
>>>> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be
>>>> that
>>>> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>>>>
>>>> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>>>>
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
>>>> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>>>>
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>>>>
>>>> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
>>>> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
>>>> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>>>>
>>>> --Christian
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <
>>>> laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Well,
>>>> >
>>>> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
>>>> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but
>>>> it
>>>> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>>>> >
>>>> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
>>>> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
>>>> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
>>>> > distribution.
>>>> >
>>>> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
>>>> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>>>> >
>>>> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries
>>>> are
>>>> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
>>>> > after it is released.
>>>> >
>>>> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2
>>>> release.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and
>>>> shouldn’t
>>>> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Gj
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache
>>>> NetBeans
>>>> > > 12.2 is available.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart
>>>> of
>>>> > > language server after change of JDK home
>>>> > >
>>>> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
>>>> > > Extension,
>>>> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of
>>>> November.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>>>> > >
>>>> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the
>>>> release
>>>> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules
>>>> are
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > following:
>>>> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed
>>>> on
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have
>>>> concern
>>>> > > about
>>>> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
>>>> > > those
>>>> > > are considered blocking.
>>>> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>>>> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>>>> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>>>> > >
>>>> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate
>>>> when
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > issue is fixed.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
>>>> > > master
>>>> > > as well:
>>>> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>>>> > > - Add the usual reviewers
>>>> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
>>>> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>>>> > >
>>>> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on
>>>> the
>>>> > > release from 15th of November!
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Link to the binary zip:
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The sources are here:
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Release schedule :
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thank you for your contributions!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>> netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>>>> > >
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net>.
I installed Big Sur on a VM with JDK 8, 11, and 15 to test java_home.
% /usr/libexec/java_home -V
Matching Java Virtual Machines (3):
15.0.1 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 15"
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
11.0.9 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 11"
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
1.8.0_275 (x86_64) "AdoptOpenJDK" - "AdoptOpenJDK 8"
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-8.jdk/Contents/Home
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
If you have the environment variable JAVA_HOME set, java_home will return
the value of JAVA_HOME regardless of the arguments provided to java_home.
% export
JAVA_HOME=/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
% /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
%
If JAVA_HOME is set to an empty string then an empty string is returned
from java_home.
% export JAVA_HOME=
% /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
%
If JAVA_HOME is not set and you use a '+' in the '-v' and also have
'--failfast' it will not find a JDK.
% unset JAVA_HOME
% /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+ --failfast
The operation couldn’t be completed. Unable to locate a Java Runtime that
supports (null).
Please visit http://www.java.com for information on installing Java.
The '-v' with a '+' works without '--failfast' but also returns the same as
not using '-v'
% unset JAVA_HOME
% /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8+
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
% /usr/libexec/java_home
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-15.jdk/Contents/Home
%
Given this information, I would say nbexec should be changed as follows.
% git diff
diff --git a/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
b/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
index ca7d16b13d..7be6a2f136 100644
--- a/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
+++ b/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec
@@ -140,10 +140,13 @@ if [ -z "$jdkhome" ] ; then
# try to find JDK
case "`uname`" in
Darwin*)
+ # check if JAVA_HOME is empty string since java_home will
return the value of JAVA_HOME
+ if [ -z "$JAVA_HOME" ]; then
+ unset JAVA_HOME
+ fi
# read Java Preferences
if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
- jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+
--failfast`
-
+ jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8+`
# JDK1.8 as a fallback
elif [ -f
"/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java" ] ;
then
jdkhome="/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0.jdk/Contents/Home"
--Christian
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:02 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wouldn’t matter, java_home doesn’t work at all, at least not in any
> reasonable way, on Big Sur. Regardless of the arguments. At least I can’t
> get it to do anything useful on my install of Big Sur.
>
> Scott
>
> On Nov 16, 2020, at 10:53 AM, Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>
>
> I believe part of the problem is in nbexec. While we fixed the installer
> to remove /usr/libexec/java_home argument changes in Big Sur, we missed it
> in nbexec.
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/e9143f9d2057fe66e0bffd5db955cf228d364346
>
> % git grep java_home
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
> public static final String BEA_JAVA_HOME="bea_java_home"; //
> NOI18N
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
> public static final String SUN_JAVA_HOME="sun_java_home"; //
> NOI18N
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
> public static final String JAVA_HOME ="java_home"; //
> NOI18N
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: if [ -x
> "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh:
> jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
>
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/postinstall/postinstall:DEFAULT_JDK_HOME=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/unpack200_to_dir.sh:javapath=`/usr/libexec/java_home
> --version 1.8`
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist:
> if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: var
> res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist:
> if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: var res =
> system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/pack200.sh:javaPath=`/usr/libexec/java_home
> --version 1.8`
> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: if [ -x
> "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh:
> javaOnMacHome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --failfast`
> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: if [ -x
> "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec:
> jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+ --failfast`
>
> --Christian
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:45 PM Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> So far, the only problem I've been able to identify via interactions in a
>> NetBeans issue re Big Sur is that it seems that during the installation of
>> Big Sur, various permissions appear to be overwritten so that the NetBeans
>> launcher can't launch NetBeans.
>>
>> So, just check the permissions and, to verify further, use the command
>> line with 'sudo' to run NetBeans, which, if it succeeds, tells you that
>> your permissions are messed up.
>>
>> Gj
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:43 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling
>>> /usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken
>>> under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME
>>> environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the
>>> java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't
>>> already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to
>>> list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home
>>> folder for one of the JDKs.
>>>
>>> I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report
>>> seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were
>>> doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple
>>> issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple
>>> (the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give
>>> them a nudge.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>>>>
>>>> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and
>>>> folder
>>>> under macOS
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
>>>> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK
>>>> 11.0.9
>>>> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
>>>> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be
>>>> that
>>>> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>>>>
>>>> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>>>>
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
>>>> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>>>>
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>>>>
>>>> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
>>>> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
>>>> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>>>>
>>>> --Christian
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <
>>>> laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Well,
>>>> >
>>>> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
>>>> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but
>>>> it
>>>> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>>>> >
>>>> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
>>>> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
>>>> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
>>>> > distribution.
>>>> >
>>>> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
>>>> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>>>> >
>>>> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries
>>>> are
>>>> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
>>>> > after it is released.
>>>> >
>>>> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2
>>>> release.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and
>>>> shouldn’t
>>>> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Gj
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache
>>>> NetBeans
>>>> > > 12.2 is available.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart
>>>> of
>>>> > > language server after change of JDK home
>>>> > >
>>>> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
>>>> > > Extension,
>>>> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of
>>>> November.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>>>> > >
>>>> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the
>>>> release
>>>> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules
>>>> are
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > following:
>>>> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed
>>>> on
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have
>>>> concern
>>>> > > about
>>>> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
>>>> > > those
>>>> > > are considered blocking.
>>>> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>>>> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>>>> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>>>> > >
>>>> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate
>>>> when
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > issue is fixed.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
>>>> > > master
>>>> > > as well:
>>>> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>>>> > > - Add the usual reviewers
>>>> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
>>>> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>>>> > >
>>>> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on
>>>> the
>>>> > > release from 15th of November!
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Link to the binary zip:
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The sources are here:
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Release schedule :
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thank you for your contributions!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>> netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>>>> > >
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com>.
Wouldn’t matter, java_home doesn’t work at all, at least not in any reasonable way, on Big Sur. Regardless of the arguments. At least I can’t get it to do anything useful on my install of Big Sur.
Scott
> On Nov 16, 2020, at 10:53 AM, Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>
>
> I believe part of the problem is in nbexec. While we fixed the installer to remove /usr/libexec/java_home argument changes in Big Sur, we missed it in nbexec.
>
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/e9143f9d2057fe66e0bffd5db955cf228d364346
>
> % git grep java_home
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String BEA_JAVA_HOME="bea_java_home"; // NOI18N
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String SUN_JAVA_HOME="sun_java_home"; // NOI18N
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String JAVA_HOME ="java_home"; // NOI18N
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/postinstall/postinstall:DEFAULT_JDK_HOME=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/unpack200_to_dir.sh:javapath=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8`
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: var res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: var res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/pack200.sh:javaPath=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8`
> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: javaOnMacHome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --failfast`
> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+ --failfast`
>
> --Christian
>
>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:45 PM Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> So far, the only problem I've been able to identify via interactions in a NetBeans issue re Big Sur is that it seems that during the installation of Big Sur, various permissions appear to be overwritten so that the NetBeans launcher can't launch NetBeans.
>>
>> So, just check the permissions and, to verify further, use the command line with 'sudo' to run NetBeans, which, if it succeeds, tells you that your permissions are messed up.
>>
>> Gj
>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:43 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling /usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home folder for one of the JDKs.
>>>
>>> I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple (the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give them a nudge.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>>>> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>>>>
>>>> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
>>>> under macOS
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
>>>> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK 11.0.9
>>>> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
>>>> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be that
>>>> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>>>>
>>>> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
>>>> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>>>>
>>>> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
>>>> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
>>>> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>>>>
>>>> --Christian
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Well,
>>>> >
>>>> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
>>>> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
>>>> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>>>> >
>>>> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
>>>> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
>>>> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
>>>> > distribution.
>>>> >
>>>> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
>>>> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>>>> >
>>>> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
>>>> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
>>>> > after it is released.
>>>> >
>>>> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
>>>> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Gj
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
>>>> > > 12.2 is available.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
>>>> > > language server after change of JDK home
>>>> > >
>>>> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
>>>> > > Extension,
>>>> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>>>> > >
>>>> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
>>>> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > following:
>>>> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
>>>> > > about
>>>> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
>>>> > > those
>>>> > > are considered blocking.
>>>> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>>>> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>>>> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>>>> > >
>>>> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > issue is fixed.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
>>>> > > master
>>>> > > as well:
>>>> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>>>> > > - Add the usual reviewers
>>>> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
>>>> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>>>> > >
>>>> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
>>>> > > release from 15th of November!
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Link to the binary zip:
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>> > >
>>>> > 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The sources are here:
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>> > >
>>>> > 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Release schedule :
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thank you for your contributions!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>>> > >
>>>> >
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com>.
Wouldn’t matter, java_home doesn’t work at all, at least not in any reasonable way, on Big Sur. Regardless of the arguments. At least I can’t get it to do anything useful on my install of Big Sur.
Scott
> On Nov 16, 2020, at 10:53 AM, Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>
>
> I believe part of the problem is in nbexec. While we fixed the installer to remove /usr/libexec/java_home argument changes in Big Sur, we missed it in nbexec.
>
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/e9143f9d2057fe66e0bffd5db955cf228d364346
>
> % git grep java_home
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String BEA_JAVA_HOME="bea_java_home"; // NOI18N
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String SUN_JAVA_HOME="sun_java_home"; // NOI18N
> contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java: public static final String JAVA_HOME ="java_home"; // NOI18N
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/postinstall/postinstall:DEFAULT_JDK_HOME=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/unpack200_to_dir.sh:javapath=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8`
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: var res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: var res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
> nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/pack200.sh:javaPath=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8`
> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: javaOnMacHome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --failfast`
> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: if [ -x "/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
> platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+ --failfast`
>
> --Christian
>
>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:45 PM Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> So far, the only problem I've been able to identify via interactions in a NetBeans issue re Big Sur is that it seems that during the installation of Big Sur, various permissions appear to be overwritten so that the NetBeans launcher can't launch NetBeans.
>>
>> So, just check the permissions and, to verify further, use the command line with 'sudo' to run NetBeans, which, if it succeeds, tells you that your permissions are messed up.
>>
>> Gj
>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:43 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling /usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home folder for one of the JDKs.
>>>
>>> I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple (the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give them a nudge.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>>>> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>>>>
>>>> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
>>>> under macOS
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
>>>> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK 11.0.9
>>>> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
>>>> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be that
>>>> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>>>>
>>>> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
>>>> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>>>>
>>>> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
>>>> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
>>>> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>>>>
>>>> --Christian
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Well,
>>>> >
>>>> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
>>>> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
>>>> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>>>> >
>>>> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
>>>> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
>>>> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
>>>> > distribution.
>>>> >
>>>> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
>>>> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>>>> >
>>>> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
>>>> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
>>>> > after it is released.
>>>> >
>>>> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
>>>> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Gj
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
>>>> > > 12.2 is available.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
>>>> > > language server after change of JDK home
>>>> > >
>>>> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
>>>> > > Extension,
>>>> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>>>> > >
>>>> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
>>>> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > following:
>>>> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
>>>> > > about
>>>> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
>>>> > > those
>>>> > > are considered blocking.
>>>> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>>>> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>>>> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>>>> > >
>>>> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > issue is fixed.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
>>>> > > master
>>>> > > as well:
>>>> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>>>> > > - Add the usual reviewers
>>>> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
>>>> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>>>> > >
>>>> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
>>>> > > release from 15th of November!
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Link to the binary zip:
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>> > >
>>>> > 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The sources are here:
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > SHA512:
>>>> > >
>>>> > 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Release schedule :
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
>>>> > >
>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thank you for your contributions!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
>>>> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>>> > >
>>>> >
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net>.
I believe part of the problem is in nbexec. While we fixed the installer to
remove /usr/libexec/java_home argument changes in Big Sur, we missed it in
nbexec.
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/e9143f9d2057fe66e0bffd5db955cf228d364346
% git grep java_home
contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
public static final String BEA_JAVA_HOME="bea_java_home"; //
NOI18N
contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
public static final String SUN_JAVA_HOME="sun_java_home"; //
NOI18N
contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
public static final String JAVA_HOME ="java_home"; //
NOI18N
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: if [ -x
"/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh:
jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/postinstall/postinstall:DEFAULT_JDK_HOME=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/unpack200_to_dir.sh:javapath=`/usr/libexec/java_home
--version 1.8`
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist:
if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: var
res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist:
if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: var res =
system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/pack200.sh:javaPath=`/usr/libexec/java_home
--version 1.8`
nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: if [ -x
"/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh:
javaOnMacHome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --failfast`
platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: if [ -x
"/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec:
jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+ --failfast`
--Christian
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:45 PM Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
> So far, the only problem I've been able to identify via interactions in a
> NetBeans issue re Big Sur is that it seems that during the installation of
> Big Sur, various permissions appear to be overwritten so that the NetBeans
> launcher can't launch NetBeans.
>
> So, just check the permissions and, to verify further, use the command
> line with 'sudo' to run NetBeans, which, if it succeeds, tells you that
> your permissions are messed up.
>
> Gj
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:43 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling
>> /usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken
>> under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME
>> environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the
>> java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't
>> already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to
>> list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home
>> folder for one of the JDKs.
>>
>> I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report
>> seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were
>> doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple
>> issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple
>> (the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give
>> them a nudge.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>>>
>>> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
>>> under macOS
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
>>> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK
>>> 11.0.9
>>> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
>>> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be
>>> that
>>> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>>>
>>> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>>>
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
>>> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>>>
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>>>
>>> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
>>> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
>>> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>>>
>>> --Christian
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <
>>> laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Well,
>>> >
>>> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
>>> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but
>>> it
>>> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>>> >
>>> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
>>> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
>>> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
>>> > distribution.
>>> >
>>> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
>>> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>>> >
>>> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries
>>> are
>>> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
>>> > after it is released.
>>> >
>>> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
>>> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>>> > >
>>> > > Gj
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
>>> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>>> > >
>>> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache
>>> NetBeans
>>> > > 12.2 is available.
>>> > >
>>> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart
>>> of
>>> > > language server after change of JDK home
>>> > >
>>> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>>> > >
>>> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
>>> > > Extension,
>>> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of
>>> November.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>>> > >
>>> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the
>>> release
>>> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>>> > >
>>> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules
>>> are
>>> > > the
>>> > > following:
>>> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed
>>> on
>>> > > the
>>> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have
>>> concern
>>> > > about
>>> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
>>> > > those
>>> > > are considered blocking.
>>> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>>> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>>> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>>> > >
>>> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate
>>> when
>>> > > the
>>> > > issue is fixed.
>>> > >
>>> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
>>> > > master
>>> > > as well:
>>> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>>> > > - Add the usual reviewers
>>> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
>>> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>>> > >
>>> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
>>> > > release from 15th of November!
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Link to the binary zip:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > SHA512:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>>> > >
>>> > > The sources are here:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > SHA512:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>>> > >
>>> > > Release schedule :
>>> > >
>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>>> > >
>>> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Thank you for your contributions!
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
>>> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>> > >
>>> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>>> > >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net>.
I believe part of the problem is in nbexec. While we fixed the installer to
remove /usr/libexec/java_home argument changes in Big Sur, we missed it in
nbexec.
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/e9143f9d2057fe66e0bffd5db955cf228d364346
% git grep java_home
contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
public static final String BEA_JAVA_HOME="bea_java_home"; //
NOI18N
contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
public static final String SUN_JAVA_HOME="sun_java_home"; //
NOI18N
contrib/j2ee.weblogic9/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/weblogic9/WLPluginProperties.java:
public static final String JAVA_HOME ="java_home"; //
NOI18N
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh: if [ -x
"/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/get_current_jdk.sh:
jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/postinstall/postinstall:DEFAULT_JDK_HOME=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/commonfiles/unpack200_to_dir.sh:javapath=`/usr/libexec/java_home
--version 1.8`
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist:
if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution-nbide.dist: var
res = system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist:
if(system.files.fileExistsAtPath('/usr/libexec/java_home')) {
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/dmg/distribution.dist: var res =
system.run("/usr/libexec/java_home", "--failfast");
nbbuild/installer/mac/newbuild/pack200.sh:javaPath=`/usr/libexec/java_home
--version 1.8`
nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh: if [ -x
"/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
nbi/engine/native/launcher/unix/src/launcher.sh:
javaOnMacHome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --failfast`
platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec: if [ -x
"/usr/libexec/java_home" ]; then
platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec:
jdkhome=`/usr/libexec/java_home --version 1.8.0+ --failfast`
--Christian
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:45 PM Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
> So far, the only problem I've been able to identify via interactions in a
> NetBeans issue re Big Sur is that it seems that during the installation of
> Big Sur, various permissions appear to be overwritten so that the NetBeans
> launcher can't launch NetBeans.
>
> So, just check the permissions and, to verify further, use the command
> line with 'sudo' to run NetBeans, which, if it succeeds, tells you that
> your permissions are messed up.
>
> Gj
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:43 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling
>> /usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken
>> under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME
>> environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the
>> java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't
>> already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to
>> list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home
>> folder for one of the JDKs.
>>
>> I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report
>> seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were
>> doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple
>> issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple
>> (the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give
>> them a nudge.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>>>
>>> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
>>> under macOS
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
>>> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK
>>> 11.0.9
>>> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
>>> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be
>>> that
>>> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>>>
>>> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>>>
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
>>> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>>>
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>>>
>>> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
>>> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
>>> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>>>
>>> --Christian
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <
>>> laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Well,
>>> >
>>> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
>>> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but
>>> it
>>> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>>> >
>>> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
>>> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
>>> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
>>> > distribution.
>>> >
>>> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
>>> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>>> >
>>> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries
>>> are
>>> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
>>> > after it is released.
>>> >
>>> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
>>> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>>> > >
>>> > > Gj
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
>>> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>>> > >
>>> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache
>>> NetBeans
>>> > > 12.2 is available.
>>> > >
>>> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart
>>> of
>>> > > language server after change of JDK home
>>> > >
>>> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>>> > >
>>> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
>>> > > Extension,
>>> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of
>>> November.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>>> > >
>>> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the
>>> release
>>> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>>> > >
>>> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules
>>> are
>>> > > the
>>> > > following:
>>> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed
>>> on
>>> > > the
>>> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have
>>> concern
>>> > > about
>>> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
>>> > > those
>>> > > are considered blocking.
>>> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>>> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>>> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>>> > >
>>> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate
>>> when
>>> > > the
>>> > > issue is fixed.
>>> > >
>>> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
>>> > > master
>>> > > as well:
>>> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>>> > > - Add the usual reviewers
>>> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
>>> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>>> > >
>>> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
>>> > > release from 15th of November!
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Link to the binary zip:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > SHA512:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>>> > >
>>> > > The sources are here:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > SHA512:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>>> > >
>>> > > Release schedule :
>>> > >
>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>>> > >
>>> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Thank you for your contributions!
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
>>> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>>> > >
>>> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>>> > >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
So far, the only problem I've been able to identify via interactions in a
NetBeans issue re Big Sur is that it seems that during the installation of
Big Sur, various permissions appear to be overwritten so that the NetBeans
launcher can't launch NetBeans.
So, just check the permissions and, to verify further, use the command line
with 'sudo' to run NetBeans, which, if it succeeds, tells you that your
permissions are messed up.
Gj
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:43 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling
> /usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken
> under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME
> environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the
> java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't
> already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to
> list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home
> folder for one of the JDKs.
>
> I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report
> seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were
> doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple
> issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple
> (the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give
> them a nudge.
>
> Scott
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>
>> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>>
>> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
>> under macOS
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
>> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK
>> 11.0.9
>> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
>> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be
>> that
>> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>>
>> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
>> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>>
>> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
>> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
>> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>>
>> --Christian
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <
>> laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Well,
>> >
>> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
>> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
>> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>> >
>> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
>> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
>> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
>> > distribution.
>> >
>> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
>> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>> >
>> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
>> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
>> > after it is released.
>> >
>> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
>> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>> > >
>> > > Gj
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
>> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>> > >
>> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache
>> NetBeans
>> > > 12.2 is available.
>> > >
>> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
>> > > language server after change of JDK home
>> > >
>> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>> > >
>> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
>> > > Extension,
>> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of
>> November.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>> > >
>> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the
>> release
>> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>> > >
>> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
>> > > the
>> > > following:
>> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
>> > > the
>> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
>> > > about
>> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
>> > > those
>> > > are considered blocking.
>> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>> > >
>> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
>> > > the
>> > > issue is fixed.
>> > >
>> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
>> > > master
>> > > as well:
>> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>> > > - Add the usual reviewers
>> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
>> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>> > >
>> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
>> > > release from 15th of November!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Link to the binary zip:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > SHA512:
>> > >
>> >
>> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>> > >
>> > > The sources are here:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > SHA512:
>> > >
>> >
>> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>> > >
>> > > Release schedule :
>> > >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>> > >
>> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thank you for your contributions!
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
>> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>> > >
>> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> > >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
So far, the only problem I've been able to identify via interactions in a
NetBeans issue re Big Sur is that it seems that during the installation of
Big Sur, various permissions appear to be overwritten so that the NetBeans
launcher can't launch NetBeans.
So, just check the permissions and, to verify further, use the command line
with 'sudo' to run NetBeans, which, if it succeeds, tells you that your
permissions are messed up.
Gj
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:43 PM Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling
> /usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken
> under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME
> environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the
> java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't
> already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to
> list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home
> folder for one of the JDKs.
>
> I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report
> seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were
> doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple
> issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple
> (the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give
> them a nudge.
>
> Scott
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
>
>> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>>
>> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
>> under macOS
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
>> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK
>> 11.0.9
>> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
>> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be
>> that
>> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>>
>> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
>> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>>
>> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
>> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
>> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>>
>> --Christian
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <
>> laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Well,
>> >
>> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
>> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
>> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>> >
>> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
>> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
>> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
>> > distribution.
>> >
>> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
>> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>> >
>> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
>> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
>> > after it is released.
>> >
>> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
>> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>> > >
>> > > Gj
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
>> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>> > >
>> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache
>> NetBeans
>> > > 12.2 is available.
>> > >
>> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
>> > > language server after change of JDK home
>> > >
>> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>> > >
>> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
>> > > Extension,
>> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of
>> November.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>> > >
>> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the
>> release
>> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>> > >
>> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
>> > > the
>> > > following:
>> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
>> > > the
>> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
>> > > about
>> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
>> > > those
>> > > are considered blocking.
>> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>> > >
>> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
>> > > the
>> > > issue is fixed.
>> > >
>> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
>> > > master
>> > > as well:
>> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>> > > - Add the usual reviewers
>> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
>> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>> > >
>> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
>> > > release from 15th of November!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Link to the binary zip:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > SHA512:
>> > >
>> >
>> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>> > >
>> > > The sources are here:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > SHA512:
>> > >
>> >
>> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>> > >
>> > > Release schedule :
>> > >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>> > >
>> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thank you for your contributions!
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
>> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>> > >
>> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> > >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com>.
Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling
/usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken
under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME
environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the
java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't
already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to
list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home
folder for one of the JDKs.
I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report
seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were
doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple
issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple
(the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give
them a nudge.
Scott
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>
> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
> under macOS
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK 11.0.9
> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be that
> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>
> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>
> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>
> --Christian
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <
> laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Well,
> >
> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
> >
> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
> > distribution.
> >
> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
> >
> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
> > after it is released.
> >
> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
> >
> >
> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
> > >
> > > Gj
> > >
> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
> > >
> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache
> NetBeans
> > > 12.2 is available.
> > >
> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
> > > language server after change of JDK home
> > >
> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
> > >
> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
> > > Extension,
> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of
> November.
> > >
> > >
> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
> > >
> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the
> release
> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
> > >
> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
> > > the
> > > following:
> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
> > > the
> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
> > > about
> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
> > > those
> > > are considered blocking.
> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
> > >
> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
> > > the
> > > issue is fixed.
> > >
> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
> > > master
> > > as well:
> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
> > > - Add the usual reviewers
> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
> > >
> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
> > > release from 15th of November!
> > >
> > >
> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
> > >
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Link to the binary zip:
> > >
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
> > >
> > >
> > > SHA512:
> > >
> >
> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
> > >
> > > The sources are here:
> > >
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
> > >
> > >
> > > SHA512:
> > >
> >
> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
> > >
> > > Release schedule :
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
> > >
> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you for your contributions!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> > >
> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> > >
> >
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Scott Palmer <sw...@gmail.com>.
Does the NB installer try to find the JDK folder by calling
/usr/libexec/java_home ? If so, the java_home tool is completely broken
under Big Sur and will not return a JDK folder unless a JAVA_HOME
environment variable is *already* set to a valid JDK, in which case the
java_home tool always returns the value $JAVA_HOME. If JAVA_HOME isn't
already set, the java_home tool doesn't work at all. You can get it to
list other JDKs installed if JAVA_HOME is already set to a valid home
folder for one of the JDKs.
I reported these issues to Apple during the Big Sur beta and the report
seemed to be reviewed by somebody that didn't have a clue what they were
doing and said java_home was working as designed! I reported a couple
issues that remain unresolved. Not sure if anyone has a contact at Apple
(the one email address I had bounced), but if you do maybe you can give
them a nudge.
Scott
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:19 AM Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net> wrote:
> I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
>
> 1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
> under macOS
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
> This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK 11.0.9
> you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
> From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be that
> NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
>
> 2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
> Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
>
> Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
> NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
> NetBeans from the Terminal.
>
> --Christian
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <
> laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Well,
> >
> > So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
> > Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
> > wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
> >
> > As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
> > issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
> > not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
> > distribution.
> >
> > These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
> > act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
> >
> > Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
> > important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
> > after it is released.
> >
> > So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
> >
> >
> > On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
> > > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
> > >
> > > Gj
> > >
> > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
> > > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
> > >
> > > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache
> NetBeans
> > > 12.2 is available.
> > >
> > > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
> > > language server after change of JDK home
> > >
> > > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
> > >
> > > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
> > > Extension,
> > > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of
> November.
> > >
> > >
> > > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
> > >
> > > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the
> release
> > > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
> > >
> > > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
> > > the
> > > following:
> > > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
> > > the
> > > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
> > > about
> > > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
> > > those
> > > are considered blocking.
> > > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
> > > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
> > > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
> > >
> > > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
> > > the
> > > issue is fixed.
> > >
> > > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
> > > master
> > > as well:
> > > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
> > > - Add the usual reviewers
> > > - API/SPI changes are fine
> > > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
> > >
> > > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
> > > release from 15th of November!
> > >
> > >
> > > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
> > >
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Link to the binary zip:
> > >
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
> > >
> > >
> > > SHA512:
> > >
> >
> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
> > >
> > > The sources are here:
> > >
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
> > >
> > >
> > > SHA512:
> > >
> >
> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
> > >
> > > Release schedule :
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
> > >
> > > Bug Priority Guidelines :
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you for your contributions!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Laszlo Kishalmi
> > > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
> > > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> > >
> > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> > >
> >
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net>.
I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
under macOS
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK 11.0.9
you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be that
NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
NetBeans from the Terminal.
--Christian
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Well,
>
> So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
> Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
> wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>
> As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
> issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
> not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
> distribution.
>
> These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
> act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>
> Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
> important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
> after it is released.
>
> So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>
>
> On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> >
> > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
> > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
> > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
> >
> > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
> > 12.2 is available.
> >
> > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
> > language server after change of JDK home
> >
> > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
> >
> > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
> > Extension,
> > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
> >
> >
> > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
> >
> > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
> > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
> >
> > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
> > the
> > following:
> > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
> > the
> > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
> > about
> > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
> > those
> > are considered blocking.
> > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
> > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
> > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
> >
> > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
> > the
> > issue is fixed.
> >
> > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
> > master
> > as well:
> > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
> > - Add the usual reviewers
> > - API/SPI changes are fine
> > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
> >
> > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
> > release from 15th of November!
> >
> >
> > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
> >
> >
> >
> > Link to the binary zip:
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
> >
> >
> > SHA512:
> >
> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
> >
> > The sources are here:
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
> >
> >
> > SHA512:
> >
> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
> >
> > Release schedule :
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
> >
> > Bug Priority Guidelines :
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you for your contributions!
> >
> > --
> > Laszlo Kishalmi
> > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
> > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> >
> > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Jaroslav Tulach <ja...@gmail.com>.
> So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
> Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
> wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
+1
> These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
> act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
+1
> Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
> important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
> after it is released.
>
> So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
+1
-jt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Makes sense to me, thanks.
Gj
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:58 PM Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Well,
>
> So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
> Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
> wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>
> As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
> issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does not
> work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip distribution.
>
> These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to act
> on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>
> Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
> important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right after
> it is released.
>
> So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>
>
> On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
>
> I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
> release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>
> Gj
>
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>>
>> The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
>> 12.2 is available.
>>
>> This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
>> language server after change of JDK home
>>
>> as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>>
>> Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode Extension,
>> so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>>
>>
>> **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>>
>> As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
>> build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>>
>> Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are the
>> following:
>> - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on the
>> developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern about
>> the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as those
>> are considered blocking.
>> - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
>> - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
>> - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>>
>> That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when the
>> issue is fixed.
>>
>> I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the master
>> as well:
>> - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
>> - Add the usual reviewers
>> - API/SPI changes are fine
>> - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>>
>> If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
>> release from 15th of November!
>>
>>
>> The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>>
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>>
>>
>> Link to the binary zip:
>>
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>>
>> SHA512:
>>
>> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>>
>> The sources are here:
>>
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>>
>> SHA512:
>>
>> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>>
>> Release schedule :
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>>
>> Bug Priority Guidelines :
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your contributions!
>>
>> --
>> Laszlo Kishalmi
>> Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>
>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>
>>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Christian Oyarzun <co...@oyarzun.net>.
I think there are potentially two issues at play with MacOS.
1. NETBEANS-5004 Netbeans not allowed to access personal files and folder
under macOS
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5004
This does not have to do with Big Sur, but rather if you use JDK 11.0.9
you can no longer access files from your Desktop or Documents folders.
From looking at the comments in the issue, the problem seems to be that
NetBeans is launched with a shell script which is not signed.
2. And an issue with dialogs in Big Sur.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3CDDBAC320-96AA-42AF-99D6-00F5AAA9566C%40jcmachado.net%3E
Not sure if this is the same issue as it just says it does not work.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202011.mbox/%3C78454EE5-6CBB-44A2-950D-0E24C85BC89E%40icloud.com%3E
Not having Big Sur installed, I have not encountered #2. But I have seen
NETBEANS-5004 with Catalina and JDK 11.0.9 and the workaround is to run
NetBeans from the Terminal.
--Christian
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Well,
>
> So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
> Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
> wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
>
> As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
> issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
> not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
> distribution.
>
> These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
> act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
>
> Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
> important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
> after it is released.
>
> So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
>
>
> On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> >
> > I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
> > release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
> > <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Apache NetBeans community,
> >
> > The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
> > 12.2 is available.
> >
> > This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
> > language server after change of JDK home
> >
> > as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
> >
> > Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
> > Extension,
> > so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
> >
> >
> > **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
> >
> > As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
> > build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
> >
> > Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
> > the
> > following:
> > - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
> > the
> > developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
> > about
> > the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
> > those
> > are considered blocking.
> > - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
> > - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
> > - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
> >
> > That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
> > the
> > issue is fixed.
> >
> > I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
> > master
> > as well:
> > - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
> > - Add the usual reviewers
> > - API/SPI changes are fine
> > - Structural changes are welcome if needed
> >
> > If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
> > release from 15th of November!
> >
> >
> > The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
> >
> >
> >
> > Link to the binary zip:
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
> >
> >
> > SHA512:
> >
> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
> >
> > The sources are here:
> >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
> >
> >
> > SHA512:
> >
> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
> >
> > Release schedule :
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
> >
> > Bug Priority Guidelines :
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you for your contributions!
> >
> > --
> > Laszlo Kishalmi
> > Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
> > <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> >
> > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>.
Well,
So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
distribution.
These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
after it is released.
So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
> I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
> release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>
> Gj
>
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
> <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>
> The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
> 12.2 is available.
>
> This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
> language server after change of JDK home
>
> as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>
> Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
> Extension,
> so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>
>
> **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>
> As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
> build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>
> Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
> the
> following:
> - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
> the
> developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
> about
> the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
> those
> are considered blocking.
> - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
> - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
> - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>
> That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
> the
> issue is fixed.
>
> I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
> master
> as well:
> - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
> - Add the usual reviewers
> - API/SPI changes are fine
> - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>
> If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
> release from 15th of November!
>
>
> The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>
>
>
> Link to the binary zip:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>
>
> SHA512:
> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>
> The sources are here:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>
>
> SHA512:
> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>
> Release schedule :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>
> Bug Priority Guidelines :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>
>
>
> Thank you for your contributions!
>
> --
> Laszlo Kishalmi
> Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
> <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by James Ostrowick <ja...@ostrowick.co.za>.
Just to give some feedback. I installed Big Sur this morning and haven’t had any issues so far.
NB12.2 worked fine for me , build and compile a Java Web application with maven.
Debug worked fine as well.
JDK 15
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13 Nov 2020, at 15:26, Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:33, Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
>> release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>
> Are there specific tickets in mind? Are they all Big Sur related?
> That was only released yesterday. Are there known workarounds for all
> issues? Are they JDK issues?
>
> With 12.1 we had a slight change in packaging for macOS documented and
> done after the release vote, as the macOS packaging involves some
> local work. If fixes require source changes in NetBeans itself (ie.
> binary zip contents), this is probably not the time to do it? I'd
> have thought targeting 12.3, and possible backport to 12.0 and 12.2
> updates might be a better option.
>
> See what Laszlo thinks, but that's my 2c on it.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by James Ostrowick <ja...@ostrowick.co.za>.
Just to give some feedback. I installed Big Sur this morning and haven’t had any issues so far.
NB12.2 worked fine for me , build and compile a Java Web application with maven.
Debug worked fine as well.
JDK 15
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13 Nov 2020, at 15:26, Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:33, Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
>> release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>
> Are there specific tickets in mind? Are they all Big Sur related?
> That was only released yesterday. Are there known workarounds for all
> issues? Are they JDK issues?
>
> With 12.1 we had a slight change in packaging for macOS documented and
> done after the release vote, as the macOS packaging involves some
> local work. If fixes require source changes in NetBeans itself (ie.
> binary zip contents), this is probably not the time to do it? I'd
> have thought targeting 12.3, and possible backport to 12.0 and 12.2
> updates might be a better option.
>
> See what Laszlo thinks, but that's my 2c on it.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:33, Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
> release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
Are there specific tickets in mind? Are they all Big Sur related?
That was only released yesterday. Are there known workarounds for all
issues? Are they JDK issues?
With 12.1 we had a slight change in packaging for macOS documented and
done after the release vote, as the macOS packaging involves some
local work. If fixes require source changes in NetBeans itself (ie.
binary zip contents), this is probably not the time to do it? I'd
have thought targeting 12.3, and possible backport to 12.0 and 12.2
updates might be a better option.
See what Laszlo thinks, but that's my 2c on it.
Best wishes,
Neil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:33, Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
> release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
Are there specific tickets in mind? Are they all Big Sur related?
That was only released yesterday. Are there known workarounds for all
issues? Are they JDK issues?
With 12.1 we had a slight change in packaging for macOS documented and
done after the release vote, as the macOS packaging involves some
local work. If fixes require source changes in NetBeans itself (ie.
binary zip contents), this is probably not the time to do it? I'd
have thought targeting 12.3, and possible backport to 12.0 and 12.2
updates might be a better option.
See what Laszlo thinks, but that's my 2c on it.
Best wishes,
Neil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>.
Well,
So far there is no open blocker issue reported against NetBeans.
Supporting an OS which just released to the public would be nice, but it
wasn't really in the scope in the last 3 months.
As far as I knew the situation, some people reported weird rendering
issues, which could be the JDK, and lately that our Mac installer does
not work on BugSur, which have the work around of using our zip
distribution.
These could be covered in the Release Notes. If we have real issues to
act on, those could be fixed in 12.3 (must be reported first though)
Again, we are releasing the Source code. Though convenience binaries are
important, we cannot be expected to support every new and shiny right
after it is released.
So we are still on track with the 15th of November cut of 12.2 release.
On 11/13/20 12:33 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
> I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
> release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
>
> Gj
>
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi
> <laszlo.kishalmi@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>
> The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
> 12.2 is available.
>
> This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
> language server after change of JDK home
>
> as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>
> Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode
> Extension,
> so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>
>
> **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>
> As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
> build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>
> Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are
> the
> following:
> - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on
> the
> developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern
> about
> the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as
> those
> are considered blocking.
> - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
> - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
> - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>
> That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when
> the
> issue is fixed.
>
> I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the
> master
> as well:
> - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
> - Add the usual reviewers
> - API/SPI changes are fine
> - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>
> If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
> release from 15th of November!
>
>
> The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>
>
>
> Link to the binary zip:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>
>
> SHA512:
> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>
> The sources are here:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>
>
> SHA512:
> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>
> Release schedule :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>
> Bug Priority Guidelines :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>
>
>
> Thank you for your contributions!
>
> --
> Laszlo Kishalmi
> Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
> <ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
Gj
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>
> The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
> 12.2 is available.
>
> This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
> language server after change of JDK home
>
> as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>
> Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode Extension,
> so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>
>
> **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>
> As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
> build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>
> Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are the
> following:
> - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on the
> developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern about
> the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as those
> are considered blocking.
> - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
> - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
> - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>
> That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when the
> issue is fixed.
>
> I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the master
> as well:
> - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
> - Add the usual reviewers
> - API/SPI changes are fine
> - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>
> If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
> release from 15th of November!
>
>
> The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>
>
> Link to the binary zip:
>
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>
> SHA512:
>
> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>
> The sources are here:
>
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>
> SHA512:
>
> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>
> Release schedule :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>
> Bug Priority Guidelines :
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>
>
> Thank you for your contributions!
>
> --
> Laszlo Kishalmi
> Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
I think we need to look at these new Mac related issues and shouldn’t
release 12.2 until we have some response or plan around that.
Gj
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 08:51, Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>
> The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
> 12.2 is available.
>
> This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
> language server after change of JDK home
>
> as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>
> Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode Extension,
> so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>
>
> **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>
> As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
> build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>
> Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are the
> following:
> - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on the
> developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern about
> the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as those
> are considered blocking.
> - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
> - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
> - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>
> That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when the
> issue is fixed.
>
> I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the master
> as well:
> - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
> - Add the usual reviewers
> - API/SPI changes are fine
> - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>
> If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
> release from 15th of November!
>
>
> The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
>
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist
>
>
> Link to the binary zip:
>
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>
> SHA512:
>
> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>
> The sources are here:
>
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>
> SHA512:
>
> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>
> Release schedule :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>
> Bug Priority Guidelines :
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>
>
> Thank you for your contributions!
>
> --
> Laszlo Kishalmi
> Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 12.2-rc2 is Available for Testing!
Posted by Jaroslav Tulach <ja...@gmail.com>.
The VSCode plugin built on 12.2-rc2 sources is available at
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-vscode/177/artifact/
java/java.lsp.server/build/apache-netbeans-java-12.2.177.vsix
and is ready for testing. We know no blocker, so let's aim at Nov 15, cutting
date!
-jt
> Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>
> The second, and hopefully final release candidate of Apache NetBeans
> 12.2 is available.
>
> This one is fixing one blocker issue [NETBEANS-5007] No restart of
> language server after change of JDK home
>
> as of: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2531
>
> Technically this codechange only affects the upcoming VSCode Extension,
> so our target date for cutting the release is still 15th of November.
>
>
> **The following rules are applied to the PR-s :**
>
> As this is a release candidate, if everything goes right the release
> build would be cut from the very same git commit as this one.
>
> Only fixes for blocker issues are allowed this time! The rules are the
> following:
> - The blocker issue, if found has to be announced and discussed on the
> developer mailing list first. Please note that if you have concern about
> the the licensing of some files/component please raise it now as those
> are considered blocking.
> - If there would be an eventual need of fix, please:
> - Mark the milestone as: 12.2
> - Please add me (lkishalmi) as an additional reviewer
>
> That would also indicate that we do another release candidate when the
> issue is fixed.
>
> I've merged all the changes happened for NetBeans12.2-rc2 to the master
> as well:
> - If you feel the PR is ready for 12.3 then mark that milestone
> - Add the usual reviewers
> - API/SPI changes are fine
> - Structural changes are welcome if needed
>
> If everything goes right the Next action would be the vote on the
> release from 15th of November!
>
>
> The NetBeans 12.2-rc2 artifacts are here:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/
> release122/17/artifact/dist
>
>
> Link to the binary zip:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/
> release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-bin.zip
>
> SHA512:
> 5b9f8194f997ce72c4f4a4cec2b32c6c0422cc5d1a3bc7a2862e813797998b7474a5f93979fb
> 1bb8e3222b31fbe03260a452d116fdca65238c520cde01174891
>
> The sources are here:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/
> release122/17/artifact/dist/netbeans/netbeans-12.2-rc2-source.zip
>
> SHA512:
> 9152c7ea1e87403ed4855ebbafbdcd431725bd1b685ad8dfeefb7c7418d1545a2eaf996e94df
> 379516f22a6d3d41171c09571810df19e40a7d1cf5e5e578e269
>
> Release schedule :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>
> Bug Priority Guidelines :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Bug+Priority+Guidelines
>
>
> Thank you for your contributions!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists