You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com> on 1997/06/13 23:12:21 UTC

Re: BIND 8.1

Most simply I think that you can add a -Uinet_ntoa to CFLAGS.

Why would you not want to use the BIND 8 version if the server is 
running on a machine running a BIND 8 named?


> 	In order to make apache use the vendor inet_ntoa, rather than
> the BIND 8 inet_ntoa, one needs to add an #undef inet_ntoa, correct?
> Where would one do that?
> 
> -- 
> Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-986-8770
> President					FAX:     510-986-8777
> C2Net
> http://www.c2.net/				sameer@c2.net

Re: BIND 8.1

Posted by Dean Gaudet <dg...@arctic.org>.

If you use NIS you may not want to use the bind 8 thing.  I've been hoping
that Paul Vixie would respond to my post on bind-workers and say "oops we
really didn't mean this" or, "sorry this is how the future will be". 

Dean

On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Randy Terbush wrote:

> Most simply I think that you can add a -Uinet_ntoa to CFLAGS.
> 
> Why would you not want to use the BIND 8 version if the server is 
> running on a machine running a BIND 8 named?
> 
> 
> > 	In order to make apache use the vendor inet_ntoa, rather than
> > the BIND 8 inet_ntoa, one needs to add an #undef inet_ntoa, correct?
> > Where would one do that?
> > 
> > -- 
> > Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-986-8770
> > President					FAX:     510-986-8777
> > C2Net
> > http://www.c2.net/				sameer@c2.net
> 
> 
> 
>