You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucenenet.apache.org by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> on 2011/09/05 20:22:04 UTC
[Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Hey All,
How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks left to take care of?
~Prescott
RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
To be honest, I don't remember what I did for 2.9.4g :) I'll take a look at
svn-logs.
AFAICR this was the test case
void StopWordTest()
{
Lucene.Net.Store.Directory dir = new RAMDirectory();
CharArraySet myStopWords = new
CharArraySet(StandardAnalyzer.STOP_WORDS_SET, ignoreCase: false);
myStopWords.Add("abcd5", "abcd5");
Analyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(myStopWords);
IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(dir, analyzer , true);
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
Document doc = new Document();
doc.Add(new Field("field", "abcd"+i , Field.Store.YES,
Field.Index.ANALYZED));
writer.AddDocument(doc);
}
writer.Close();
IndexSearcher src = new IndexSearcher(dir);
TopDocs topdocs = src.Search(new QueryParser("field",
analyzer).Parse("abcd5"), 500);
System.Diagnostics.Debug.Assert(topdocs.ScoreDocs.Length == 0,
"topdocs.ScoreDocs.Length should be zero");
}
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:51 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
I'll take a look at this for the trunk - I see you've fixed it in 2.9.4g, if
you have any ideas how that fix might be applicable to the trunk shoot them
out. I know g has a ton of changes and updated code, so it might be so easy
in the main trunk.
~P
----------------------------------------
> From: digydigy@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:45:06 +0300
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> There is an issue still open(LUCENENET-414) related with StopWords.
>
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
>
> Hey All,
>
>
>
> How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> left to take care of?
>
>
>
> ~Prescott =
> -----
> Bu iletide virüs bulunamad¹.
> AVG taraf¹ndan kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritaban¹: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi:
05.09.2011
>
RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
I'll take a look at this for the trunk - I see you've fixed it in 2.9.4g, if you have any ideas how that fix might be applicable to the trunk shoot them out. I know g has a ton of changes and updated code, so it might be so easy in the main trunk.
~P
----------------------------------------
> From: digydigy@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:45:06 +0300
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> There is an issue still open(LUCENENET-414) related with StopWords.
>
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
>
> Hey All,
>
>
>
> How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> left to take care of?
>
>
>
> ~Prescott =
> -----
> Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
> AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi: 05.09.2011
>
RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
There is an issue still open(LUCENENET-414) related with StopWords.
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Hey All,
How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
left to take care of?
~Prescott =
-----
Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi: 05.09.2011
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2011-09-07, Michael Herndon wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig might still be away
He is back ;-)
> and I think we need his vote on the release when the time
> comes. (correct me, because I could be uber wrong).
For the release you need three +1s by Incubator PMC members. After
voting here a second vote will happen on the general list where the
missing IPMC member votes can be collected. Of course it will be easier
if the mentors (Benson, Gianugo and myself in this case) have already
voted.
Stefan
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Michael Herndon <mh...@wickedsoftware.net>.
Should we put together a quick release checklist ?
* I know that jira 407 mentions putting out a 2.9.2 build that is signed
when releasing 2.9.4
* We should be able to build a chm & doc website using sandcastle. The
downside is the website that gets built now requires asp.net instead of just
vanilla HTML and I have yet to find an option that allows just HTML.
Depending on what we do with this, we would need to remove the link to the
docs in the README file inside of trunk.
* Stefan Bodewig might still be away and I think we need his vote on the
release when the time comes. (correct me, because I could be uber wrong).
If there is anything that requires work and you think I can help with in
order to get this release out the door, just let me know.
- Michael
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> Also +1 - but I don't mind waiting to hear back regarding the RavenDB stuff
> - but we can prepare assuming it's all good.
>
>
>
> Digy can you elaborate on 414 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414). I must not have
> understood the complaint/question as adding that one method to me doesn't
> seem to resolve the issue brought up
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~P
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: digydigy@gmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:14:37 +0300
> > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> > +1 for an official release.
> > DIGY
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> >
> >
> > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> > left to take care of?
> >
> >
> >
> > ~Prescott =
> > -----
> > Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
> > AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> > Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi:
> 05.09.2011
> >
>
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
What version is going to make it to nuget? 2.9.4 or 2.9.4g?
2011/9/7 digy digy <di...@gmail.com>
> You are right. I forgot to add a patch related with type-casting.
>
> Summary of the long story:
>
> Since CharArraySet inherits from Hashtable, some unimplemented methods such
> as Add(object,object) refer to the base class(Hashtable) which is wrong.
>
> Also calling GetEnumerator() using the
> System.Collections.ICollection interface does result in Hashtable's
> GetEnumerator() being invoked. So an explicit typecast is needed for
> invoking CharArraySet.GetEnumerator()
>
> (As a result, a bad (but *almost* working) implementation. It is rewritten
> in 2.9.4g)
>
> DIGY
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > Also +1 - but I don't mind waiting to hear back regarding the RavenDB
> stuff
> > - but we can prepare assuming it's all good.
> >
> >
> >
> > Digy can you elaborate on 414 (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414). I must not have
> > understood the complaint/question as adding that one method to me doesn't
> > seem to resolve the issue brought up
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > ~P
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> > > From: digydigy@gmail.com
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:14:37 +0300
> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >
> > > +1 for an official release.
> > > DIGY
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org;
> lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey All,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready
> to
> > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some
> tasks
> > > left to take care of?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ~Prescott =
> > > -----
> > > Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
> > > AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> > > Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi:
> > 05.09.2011
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by digy digy <di...@gmail.com>.
You are right. I forgot to add a patch related with type-casting.
Summary of the long story:
Since CharArraySet inherits from Hashtable, some unimplemented methods such
as Add(object,object) refer to the base class(Hashtable) which is wrong.
Also calling GetEnumerator() using the
System.Collections.ICollection interface does result in Hashtable's
GetEnumerator() being invoked. So an explicit typecast is needed for
invoking CharArraySet.GetEnumerator()
(As a result, a bad (but *almost* working) implementation. It is rewritten
in 2.9.4g)
DIGY
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> Also +1 - but I don't mind waiting to hear back regarding the RavenDB stuff
> - but we can prepare assuming it's all good.
>
>
>
> Digy can you elaborate on 414 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414). I must not have
> understood the complaint/question as adding that one method to me doesn't
> seem to resolve the issue brought up
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~P
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: digydigy@gmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:14:37 +0300
> > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> > +1 for an official release.
> > DIGY
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> >
> >
> > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> > left to take care of?
> >
> >
> >
> > ~Prescott =
> > -----
> > Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
> > AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> > Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi:
> 05.09.2011
> >
>
RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
Also +1 - but I don't mind waiting to hear back regarding the RavenDB stuff - but we can prepare assuming it's all good.
Digy can you elaborate on 414 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414). I must not have understood the complaint/question as adding that one method to me doesn't seem to resolve the issue brought up
Thanks,
~P
----------------------------------------
> From: digydigy@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:14:37 +0300
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> +1 for an official release.
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
>
> Hey All,
>
>
>
> How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> left to take care of?
>
>
>
> ~Prescott =
> -----
> Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
> AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi: 05.09.2011
>
RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
+1 for an official release.
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Hey All,
How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
left to take care of?
~Prescott =
-----
Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi: 05.09.2011
RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing
against all projects using Lucene.Net
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at how
RavenDB uses it?
At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
)
but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> left to take care of?
>
> ~Prescott
-----
Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi: 05.09.2011
RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
Yeah, I looked at it as 2.9.4 has been around a while, I've been using it for a while, and I assume others have as well, and we haven't had any complaints (few exceptions).
I hope people aren't waiting for a "last call" to provide feedback. It should be continous. When it dies down, I assume issues are shaken out and things are somewhat vetted.
~P
----------------------------------------
> From: digydigy@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:48:02 +0300
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> To avoid misunderstanding...
>
> Community==all Lucene.Net users
>
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing
> against all projects using Lucene.Net
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at how
> RavenDB uses it?
>
> At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> )
> but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
> unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
>
> On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> > left to take care of?
> >
> > ~Prescott
>
> -----
> Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
> AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi: 05.09.2011
>
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Michael Herndon <mh...@wickedsoftware.net>.
> What version is going to make it to nuget? 2.9.4 or 2.9.4g?
ooo totally forgot about nuget. we definitely need to get that setup.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:46 AM, digy digy <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to only
> 2.9.4g branch.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431
>
> DIGY
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to
> > measure memory usage among other things.
> >
> > There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren for
> > Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See
> > http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3
> >
> > Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4?
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and
> > > will let you know how it went.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
> > >> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn.
> > >> I'll
> > >> check next time I push something to svn.
> > >>
> > >> But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
> > >>
> > >> - michael
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
> > >> > These are the original locations
> > >> > 2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> > >> > 2.9.4g
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
> > >> > 9_4g/
> > >> >
> > >> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > DIGY
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: itamar.synhershko@gmail.com [mailto:
> itamar.synhershko@gmail.com
> > ]
> > >> On
> > >> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
> > >> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >> >
> > >> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for
> > >> > potential
> > >> > memory leaks
> > >> >
> > >> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4
> > tag
> > >> I
> > >> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the
> > strongly
> > >> > signed patch applied to it?
> > >> >
> > >> > 2011/9/6 Digy <di...@gmail.com>
> > >> >
> > >> > > To avoid misunderstanding...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users
> > >> > >
> > >> > > DIGY
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> > >> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> > >> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of
> > >> testing
> > >> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net
> > >> > > DIGY
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
> > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> > >> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >> > >
> > >> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a
> look
> > >> at
> > >> > how
> > >> > > RavenDB uses it?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> > >> > > )
> > >> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all
> > it's
> > >> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Hey All,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it
> > for
> > >> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are
> > >> ready
> > >> > to
> > >> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have
> > some
> > >> > tasks
> > >> > > > left to take care of?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > ~Prescott
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
I see. It is merely a bug fix, and we would be happy to see it in 2.9.4 too
- so we can get it from nuget instead of forking it
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:46 PM, digy digy <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to only
> 2.9.4g branch.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431
>
> DIGY
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to
> > measure memory usage among other things.
> >
> > There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren for
> > Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See
> > http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3
> >
> > Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4?
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and
> > > will let you know how it went.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
> > >> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn.
> > >> I'll
> > >> check next time I push something to svn.
> > >>
> > >> But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
> > >>
> > >> - michael
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
> > >> > These are the original locations
> > >> > 2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> > >> > 2.9.4g
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
> > >> > 9_4g/
> > >> >
> > >> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > DIGY
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: itamar.synhershko@gmail.com [mailto:
> itamar.synhershko@gmail.com
> > ]
> > >> On
> > >> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
> > >> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >> >
> > >> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for
> > >> > potential
> > >> > memory leaks
> > >> >
> > >> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4
> > tag
> > >> I
> > >> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the
> > strongly
> > >> > signed patch applied to it?
> > >> >
> > >> > 2011/9/6 Digy <di...@gmail.com>
> > >> >
> > >> > > To avoid misunderstanding...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users
> > >> > >
> > >> > > DIGY
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> > >> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> > >> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of
> > >> testing
> > >> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net
> > >> > > DIGY
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
> > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> > >> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >> > >
> > >> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a
> look
> > >> at
> > >> > how
> > >> > > RavenDB uses it?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> > >> > > )
> > >> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all
> > it's
> > >> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Hey All,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it
> > for
> > >> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are
> > >> ready
> > >> > to
> > >> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have
> > some
> > >> > tasks
> > >> > > > left to take care of?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > ~Prescott
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by digy digy <di...@gmail.com>.
Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to only
2.9.4g branch.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431
DIGY
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
> Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to
> measure memory usage among other things.
>
> There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren for
> Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See
> http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3
>
> Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4?
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and
> > will let you know how it went.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
> >> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn.
> >> I'll
> >> check next time I push something to svn.
> >>
> >> But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
> >>
> >> - michael
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
> >> > These are the original locations
> >> > 2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> >> > 2.9.4g
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
> >> > 9_4g/
> >> >
> >> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > DIGY
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: itamar.synhershko@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhershko@gmail.com
> ]
> >> On
> >> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
> >> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >> >
> >> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for
> >> > potential
> >> > memory leaks
> >> >
> >> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4
> tag
> >> I
> >> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the
> strongly
> >> > signed patch applied to it?
> >> >
> >> > 2011/9/6 Digy <di...@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > > To avoid misunderstanding...
> >> > >
> >> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users
> >> > >
> >> > > DIGY
> >> > >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> >> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> >> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >> > >
> >> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of
> >> testing
> >> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net
> >> > > DIGY
> >> > >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
> >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> >> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >> > >
> >> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look
> >> at
> >> > how
> >> > > RavenDB uses it?
> >> > >
> >> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> >> > > )
> >> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all
> it's
> >> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
> >> > >
> >> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Hey All,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it
> for
> >> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are
> >> ready
> >> > to
> >> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have
> some
> >> > tasks
> >> > > > left to take care of?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ~Prescott
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to
measure memory usage among other things.
There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren for
Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See
http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3
Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>wrote:
> Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and
> will let you know how it went.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon <
> mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>
>> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
>> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn.
>> I'll
>> check next time I push something to svn.
>>
>> But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
>>
>> - michael
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
>> > These are the original locations
>> > 2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
>> > 2.9.4g
>> >
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
>> > 9_4g/
>> >
>> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > DIGY
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: itamar.synhershko@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhershko@gmail.com]
>> On
>> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
>> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>> >
>> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for
>> > potential
>> > memory leaks
>> >
>> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag
>> I
>> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly
>> > signed patch applied to it?
>> >
>> > 2011/9/6 Digy <di...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > > To avoid misunderstanding...
>> > >
>> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users
>> > >
>> > > DIGY
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
>> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
>> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
>> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>> > >
>> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of
>> testing
>> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net
>> > > DIGY
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
>> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
>> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>> > >
>> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look
>> at
>> > how
>> > > RavenDB uses it?
>> > >
>> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
>> > > )
>> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
>> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
>> > >
>> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Hey All,
>> > > >
>> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
>> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are
>> ready
>> > to
>> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some
>> > tasks
>> > > > left to take care of?
>> > > >
>> > > > ~Prescott
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and will
let you know how it went.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net
> wrote:
> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn. I'll
> check next time I push something to svn.
>
> But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
>
> - michael
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
> > These are the original locations
> > 2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> > 2.9.4g
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
> > 9_4g/
> >
> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > DIGY
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: itamar.synhershko@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhershko@gmail.com]
> On
> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for
> > potential
> > memory leaks
> >
> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I
> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly
> > signed patch applied to it?
> >
> > 2011/9/6 Digy <di...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > To avoid misunderstanding...
> > >
> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users
> > >
> > > DIGY
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >
> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of
> testing
> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net
> > > DIGY
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >
> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at
> > how
> > > RavenDB uses it?
> > >
> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> > > )
> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
> > >
> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hey All,
> > > >
> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready
> > to
> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some
> > tasks
> > > > left to take care of?
> > > >
> > > > ~Prescott
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2011-09-06, Michael Herndon wrote:
> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn.
The one at git.apache.org is updated via commit hooks, see
<http://www.apache.org/dev/git.html>. Don't know about the one at
github either.
Stefan
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Michael Herndon <mh...@wickedsoftware.net>.
I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn. I'll
check next time I push something to svn.
But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
- michael
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
> These are the original locations
> 2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> 2.9.4g
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
> 9_4g/
>
> Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
>
> Thanks,
> DIGY
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: itamar.synhershko@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhershko@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for
> potential
> memory leaks
>
> Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I
> can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly
> signed patch applied to it?
>
> 2011/9/6 Digy <di...@gmail.com>
>
> > To avoid misunderstanding...
> >
> > Community==all Lucene.Net users
> >
> > DIGY
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing
> > against all projects using Lucene.Net
> > DIGY
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at
> how
> > RavenDB uses it?
> >
> > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
> >
> >
>
> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> > )
> > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
> > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
> >
> > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hey All,
> > >
> > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready
> to
> > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some
> tasks
> > > left to take care of?
> > >
> > > ~Prescott
> >
>
>
>
RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
These are the original locations
2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
2.9.4g
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
9_4g/
Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
Thanks,
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: itamar.synhershko@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhershko@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for potential
memory leaks
Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I
can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly
signed patch applied to it?
2011/9/6 Digy <di...@gmail.com>
> To avoid misunderstanding...
>
> Community==all Lucene.Net users
>
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing
> against all projects using Lucene.Net
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at
how
> RavenDB uses it?
>
> At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
>
>
https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> )
> but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
> unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
>
> On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some
tasks
> > left to take care of?
> >
> > ~Prescott
>
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for potential
memory leaks
Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I
can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly
signed patch applied to it?
2011/9/6 Digy <di...@gmail.com>
> To avoid misunderstanding...
>
> Community==all Lucene.Net users
>
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing
> against all projects using Lucene.Net
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at how
> RavenDB uses it?
>
> At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
>
> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> )
> but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
> unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
>
> On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> > left to take care of?
> >
> > ~Prescott
>
> -----
> Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
> AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi:
> 05.09.2011
>
>
>
RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
To avoid misunderstanding...
Community==all Lucene.Net users
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing
against all projects using Lucene.Net
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at how
RavenDB uses it?
At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
)
but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> left to take care of?
>
> ~Prescott
-----
Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi: 05.09.2011
Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Matt Warren <ma...@gmail.com>.
If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at how
RavenDB uses it?
At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2)
but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> left to take care of?
>
> ~Prescott
RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
There is an issue still open(LUCENENET-414) related with StopWords.
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Hey All,
How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
left to take care of?
~Prescott =
-----
Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi: 05.09.2011