You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Vladimir Ozerov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/28 09:48:13 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-2334) Consider getting rid of XXX8 data
structures.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Vladimir Ozerov updated IGNITE-2334:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.6)
1.7
> Consider getting rid of XXX8 data structures.
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-2334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2334
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: cache
> Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
> Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
> Fix For: 1.7
>
>
> Current state of Java 8 data structures differs from our "jsr166" data structures.
> One noticeable change is how size is handled inside ConcurrentHashMap. Instead of using LongAdder, it has some inlined version of adder which is more suitable for map operations.
> But our outdated implementation ConcurrentHashMap8 still uses LongAdder8 and it is seen as a hotspot in profiler.
> We should evaluate whether it still makes sense to keep our versions of concurrent structures.
> 1) Quickly replace all *8* data structures with their normal counterparts.
> 2) Run benchmarks with Java7 and Java8.
> 3) Decide whether change is needed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)