You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "chenxu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/06/22 04:01:00 UTC
[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (HBASE-20740) StochasticLoadBalancer
should consider CoprocessorService request factor when computing cost
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
chenxu updated HBASE-20740:
---------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: {quote} Please fill out release note.
{quote}
Has the patch been commited? I can't edit the *Release Note*)
> StochasticLoadBalancer should consider CoprocessorService request factor when computing cost
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20740
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20740
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Balancer
> Reporter: chenxu
> Assignee: chenxu
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: 20740-master-v2.patch, HBASE-20740-master-v1.patch, HBASE-20740-master-v3.patch
>
>
> When compute region load cost, ReadRequest, WriteRequest, MemStoreSize and StoreFileSize are considered, But CoprocessorService requests are ignored. In our KYLIN cluster, there only have CoprocessorService requests, and the cluster sometimes unbalanced.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)