[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-156) Name of threads created for Service ThreadPoolFilter aren't very revelant

["Trustin Lee (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-156?page=comments#action_12361578 ] 

Trustin Lee commented on DIRMINA-156:
-------------------------------------

if you need more control over therad model, then you'd better use IoAcceptor directly IMHO.  ServiceRegistry might be removed before we release 1.0 because we'll simplify the API so we don't need any frontend API anymore, so it makes sense considering current situation.

> Name of threads created for Service ThreadPoolFilter aren't very revelant
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DIRMINA-156
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-156
>      Project: Directory MINA
>         Type: Improvement
>     Versions: 0.9
>  Environment: MINA 0.9, looking at Thread list of a MINA server using jconsole
>     Reporter: Julien Vermillard
>     Priority: Minor

>
> all the threads created by the ThreadPoolFilters, added to Services by the SimpleServiceRegistry got the name "PoolThreadXXX".
> a prefix with the service name whould be usefull for debuging or reading logs

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira