You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Luca Dall'Osto <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> on 2017/08/04 09:32:31 UTC

Re: Get results in multiple orders (multiple boosts)

Hello,
sorry for the late, I was out of my home.


In response to Rick: 
I can't do that because: 
1) each user should have multiple sort (for example user "A" can sort by date and then by category and then by name ...) .
2) the sort is not natural sort: user has a custom order for a field (for example sorting category field of user "A" could be category 10 at position 1, category 2 at position 2, category 9500 at position 3, category 40 at position 5 ...).


In response to Susheel:have you done an example? 

Thanks for your response.

Luca

 

    On Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:10 AM, Susheel Kumar <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
 

 Let me try to put an example for custom sort.

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote:

> Luca,
> You can pass a sort parameter in the query. User A could sort=date%20desc
> and user b could sort=foofield%20asc.
>
> Maybe query functions can also help with this. Cheers -- Rick
>
> On July 19, 2017 4:39:59 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto
> <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
> >Hello,The problem of build an index is that each user has a custom
> >source order and category order: are not static orders (for example
> >user X could have category:5 as most important category but user Y
> >could have category:9 as most important).
> >Has anyone ever written a custom sort function in solr?Maybe a link of
> >a tutorial or an example could be very helpful. Thanks
> >
> >Luca
> >
> >On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:18 PM, alessandro.benedetti
> ><a....@sease.io> wrote:
> >
> >
> >"I have different "sort preferences", so I can't build a index and use
> >for
> >sorting.Maybe I have to sort by category then by source and by language
> >or
> >by source, then by category and by date"
> >
> >I would like to focus on this bit.
> >It is ok to go for a custom function and sort at query time, but I am
> >curious to explore why an index time solution should not be ok.
> >You can have these distinct fields :
> >source_priority
> >language_priority
> >category_priority
> >ect
> >
> >This values can be assigned at the documents at indexing time ( using
> >for
> >example a custom update request processor).
> >Then at query time you can easily sort on those values in a multi
> >layered
> >approach :
> >sort:source_priority desc, category_priority  desc
> >Of course, if the priority for a source changes quite often or if it's
> >user
> >dependent, a query time solution would be preferred.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----
> >---------------
> >Alessandro Benedetti
> >Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
> >Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
> >--
> >View this message in context:
> >http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-results-in-
> multiple-orders-multiple-boosts-tp4346304p4346559.html
> >Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com


   

Re: Get results in multiple orders (multiple boosts)

Posted by Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com>.
Luca
Can you give me an example? If category_id is 9500, what would you want to sort on? -- Rick

On August 16, 2017 5:19:56 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>Hello Rick,
>I have no algorithm: user choose the order of the categories, and the
>sources, For example:
>
>
>For Category:
>- at position 0 category_id 9500.
>- at position 1 category_id 10.
>- at position 2 category_ud 555.
>(etc...)
>
>
>For Source:
>
>- at position 0 source_id 12.
>- at position 1 source_id 30.
>
>- at position 2 source_id 3.
>
>(etc...)
>
>
>After that, user decide what kind of sort apply.
>For example: fist by DATE, then by CATEGORY, then by SOURCE and then by
>NAME.
>I have 1 array with all category Ids with correct order decided by user
>and another one with source Ids in correct order decided by user.
>Then I have another array that specify the sort type (like example,
>user should ask documents ordered by DATE first, then by CATEGORY,
>etc... )
>Natural sort order could be fine only for DATE and NAME, but for
>CATEGORY and SOURCE I have to use the array with ids sorted by user.
>Thanks!
>
>Luca 
>
>On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 6:54 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com>
>wrote:
> 
>
> Luca,
>What is the algorithm for the custom sort order?  -- Rick
>
>On August 7, 2017 6:38:49 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto
><te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>Hello Rick,
>>thanks for your answer.
>>Yes, I compose solr query from frontend request, but I'm not able to
>>sort by a custom order, only by natural order (for example:
>>sort=category desc, source desc, /*...*/ ).
>>How do you set a custom sort order in solr?
>>Thanks
>>
>>Luca
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>On Friday, August 4, 2017 7:41 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com>
>>wrote:
>> 
>>
>> Luca
>>I hope you have a web app in front of Solr. It could accept parameters
>>from the browser, then construct the query as necessary to do your
>>sorting. Cheers -- Rick
>>
>>On August 4, 2017 5:32:31 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto
>><te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>>Hello,
>>>sorry for the late, I was out of my home.
>>>
>>>
>>>In response to Rick: 
>>>I can't do that because: 
>>>1) each user should have multiple sort (for example user "A" can sort
>>>by date and then by category and then by name ...) .
>>>2) the sort is not natural sort: user has a custom order for a field
>>>(for example sorting category field of user "A" could be category 10
>>at
>>>position 1, category 2 at position 2, category 9500 at position 3,
>>>category 40 at position 5 ...).
>>>
>>>
>>>In response to Susheel:have you done an example? 
>>>
>>>Thanks for your response.
>>>
>>>Luca
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>On Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:10 AM, Susheel Kumar
>>><su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>> Let me try to put an example for custom sort.
>>>
>>>On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com>
>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Luca,
>>>> You can pass a sort parameter in the query. User A could
>>>sort=date%20desc
>>>> and user b could sort=foofield%20asc.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe query functions can also help with this. Cheers -- Rick
>>>>
>>>> On July 19, 2017 4:39:59 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto
>>>> <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>>> >Hello,The problem of build an index is that each user has a custom
>>>> >source order and category order: are not static orders (for
>example
>>>> >user X could have category:5 as most important category but user Y
>>>> >could have category:9 as most important).
>>>> >Has anyone ever written a custom sort function in solr?Maybe a
>link
>>>of
>>>> >a tutorial or an example could be very helpful. Thanks
>>>> >
>>>> >Luca
>>>> >
>>>> >On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:18 PM, alessandro.benedetti
>>>> ><a....@sease.io> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >"I have different "sort preferences", so I can't build a index and
>>>use
>>>> >for
>>>> >sorting.Maybe I have to sort by category then by source and by
>>>language
>>>> >or
>>>> >by source, then by category and by date"
>>>> >
>>>> >I would like to focus on this bit.
>>>> >It is ok to go for a custom function and sort at query time, but I
>>>am
>>>> >curious to explore why an index time solution should not be ok.
>>>> >You can have these distinct fields :
>>>> >source_priority
>>>> >language_priority
>>>> >category_priority
>>>> >ect
>>>> >
>>>> >This values can be assigned at the documents at indexing time (
>>>using
>>>> >for
>>>> >example a custom update request processor).
>>>> >Then at query time you can easily sort on those values in a multi
>>>> >layered
>>>> >approach :
>>>> >sort:source_priority desc, category_priority  desc
>>>> >Of course, if the priority for a source changes quite often or if
>>>it's
>>>> >user
>>>> >dependent, a query time solution would be preferred.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >-----
>>>> >---------------
>>>> >Alessandro Benedetti
>>>> >Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
>>>> >Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
>>>> >--
>>>> >View this message in context:
>>>> >http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-results-in-
>>>> multiple-orders-multiple-boosts-tp4346304p4346559.html
>>>> >Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>
>>-- 
>>Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
>>
>>  
>
>-- 
>Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
>
>   

-- 
Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com 

Re: Get results in multiple orders (multiple boosts)

Posted by Luca Dall'Osto <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID>.
Hello Rick,
I have no algorithm: user choose the order of the categories, and the sources, For example:


For Category:
- at position 0 category_id 9500.
- at position 1 category_id 10.
- at position 2 category_ud 555.
(etc...)


For Source:

- at position 0 source_id 12.
- at position 1 source_id 30.

- at position 2 source_id 3.

(etc...)


After that, user decide what kind of sort apply.
For example: fist by DATE, then by CATEGORY, then by SOURCE and then by NAME.
I have 1 array with all category Ids with correct order decided by user and another one with source Ids in correct order decided by user.
Then I have another array that specify the sort type (like example, user should ask documents ordered by DATE first, then by CATEGORY, etc... )
Natural sort order could be fine only for DATE and NAME, but for CATEGORY and SOURCE I have to use the array with ids sorted by user.
Thanks!

Luca 

    On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 6:54 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote:
 

 Luca,
What is the algorithm for the custom sort order?  -- Rick

On August 7, 2017 6:38:49 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>Hello Rick,
>thanks for your answer.
>Yes, I compose solr query from frontend request, but I'm not able to
>sort by a custom order, only by natural order (for example:
>sort=category desc, source desc, /*...*/ ).
>How do you set a custom sort order in solr?
>Thanks
>
>Luca
>
>
> 
>
>On Friday, August 4, 2017 7:41 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com>
>wrote:
> 
>
> Luca
>I hope you have a web app in front of Solr. It could accept parameters
>from the browser, then construct the query as necessary to do your
>sorting. Cheers -- Rick
>
>On August 4, 2017 5:32:31 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto
><te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>Hello,
>>sorry for the late, I was out of my home.
>>
>>
>>In response to Rick: 
>>I can't do that because: 
>>1) each user should have multiple sort (for example user "A" can sort
>>by date and then by category and then by name ...) .
>>2) the sort is not natural sort: user has a custom order for a field
>>(for example sorting category field of user "A" could be category 10
>at
>>position 1, category 2 at position 2, category 9500 at position 3,
>>category 40 at position 5 ...).
>>
>>
>>In response to Susheel:have you done an example? 
>>
>>Thanks for your response.
>>
>>Luca
>>
>> 
>>
>>On Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:10 AM, Susheel Kumar
>><su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>
>> Let me try to put an example for custom sort.
>>
>>On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Luca,
>>> You can pass a sort parameter in the query. User A could
>>sort=date%20desc
>>> and user b could sort=foofield%20asc.
>>>
>>> Maybe query functions can also help with this. Cheers -- Rick
>>>
>>> On July 19, 2017 4:39:59 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto
>>> <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>> >Hello,The problem of build an index is that each user has a custom
>>> >source order and category order: are not static orders (for example
>>> >user X could have category:5 as most important category but user Y
>>> >could have category:9 as most important).
>>> >Has anyone ever written a custom sort function in solr?Maybe a link
>>of
>>> >a tutorial or an example could be very helpful. Thanks
>>> >
>>> >Luca
>>> >
>>> >On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:18 PM, alessandro.benedetti
>>> ><a....@sease.io> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >"I have different "sort preferences", so I can't build a index and
>>use
>>> >for
>>> >sorting.Maybe I have to sort by category then by source and by
>>language
>>> >or
>>> >by source, then by category and by date"
>>> >
>>> >I would like to focus on this bit.
>>> >It is ok to go for a custom function and sort at query time, but I
>>am
>>> >curious to explore why an index time solution should not be ok.
>>> >You can have these distinct fields :
>>> >source_priority
>>> >language_priority
>>> >category_priority
>>> >ect
>>> >
>>> >This values can be assigned at the documents at indexing time (
>>using
>>> >for
>>> >example a custom update request processor).
>>> >Then at query time you can easily sort on those values in a multi
>>> >layered
>>> >approach :
>>> >sort:source_priority desc, category_priority  desc
>>> >Of course, if the priority for a source changes quite often or if
>>it's
>>> >user
>>> >dependent, a query time solution would be preferred.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >-----
>>> >---------------
>>> >Alessandro Benedetti
>>> >Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
>>> >Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
>>> >--
>>> >View this message in context:
>>> >http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-results-in-
>>> multiple-orders-multiple-boosts-tp4346304p4346559.html
>>> >Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
>>
>>
>>  
>
>-- 
>Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
>
>  

-- 
Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com

   

Re: Get results in multiple orders (multiple boosts)

Posted by Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com>.
Luca,
What is the algorithm for the custom sort order?  -- Rick

On August 7, 2017 6:38:49 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>Hello Rick,
>thanks for your answer.
>Yes, I compose solr query from frontend request, but I'm not able to
>sort by a custom order, only by natural order (for example:
>sort=category desc, source desc, /*...*/ ).
>How do you set a custom sort order in solr?
>Thanks
>
>Luca
>
>
> 
>
>On Friday, August 4, 2017 7:41 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com>
>wrote:
> 
>
> Luca
>I hope you have a web app in front of Solr. It could accept parameters
>from the browser, then construct the query as necessary to do your
>sorting. Cheers -- Rick
>
>On August 4, 2017 5:32:31 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto
><te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>Hello,
>>sorry for the late, I was out of my home.
>>
>>
>>In response to Rick: 
>>I can't do that because: 
>>1) each user should have multiple sort (for example user "A" can sort
>>by date and then by category and then by name ...) .
>>2) the sort is not natural sort: user has a custom order for a field
>>(for example sorting category field of user "A" could be category 10
>at
>>position 1, category 2 at position 2, category 9500 at position 3,
>>category 40 at position 5 ...).
>>
>>
>>In response to Susheel:have you done an example? 
>>
>>Thanks for your response.
>>
>>Luca
>>
>> 
>>
>>On Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:10 AM, Susheel Kumar
>><su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>
>> Let me try to put an example for custom sort.
>>
>>On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Luca,
>>> You can pass a sort parameter in the query. User A could
>>sort=date%20desc
>>> and user b could sort=foofield%20asc.
>>>
>>> Maybe query functions can also help with this. Cheers -- Rick
>>>
>>> On July 19, 2017 4:39:59 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto
>>> <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>> >Hello,The problem of build an index is that each user has a custom
>>> >source order and category order: are not static orders (for example
>>> >user X could have category:5 as most important category but user Y
>>> >could have category:9 as most important).
>>> >Has anyone ever written a custom sort function in solr?Maybe a link
>>of
>>> >a tutorial or an example could be very helpful. Thanks
>>> >
>>> >Luca
>>> >
>>> >On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:18 PM, alessandro.benedetti
>>> ><a....@sease.io> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >"I have different "sort preferences", so I can't build a index and
>>use
>>> >for
>>> >sorting.Maybe I have to sort by category then by source and by
>>language
>>> >or
>>> >by source, then by category and by date"
>>> >
>>> >I would like to focus on this bit.
>>> >It is ok to go for a custom function and sort at query time, but I
>>am
>>> >curious to explore why an index time solution should not be ok.
>>> >You can have these distinct fields :
>>> >source_priority
>>> >language_priority
>>> >category_priority
>>> >ect
>>> >
>>> >This values can be assigned at the documents at indexing time (
>>using
>>> >for
>>> >example a custom update request processor).
>>> >Then at query time you can easily sort on those values in a multi
>>> >layered
>>> >approach :
>>> >sort:source_priority desc, category_priority  desc
>>> >Of course, if the priority for a source changes quite often or if
>>it's
>>> >user
>>> >dependent, a query time solution would be preferred.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >-----
>>> >---------------
>>> >Alessandro Benedetti
>>> >Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
>>> >Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
>>> >--
>>> >View this message in context:
>>> >http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-results-in-
>>> multiple-orders-multiple-boosts-tp4346304p4346559.html
>>> >Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
>>
>>
>>  
>
>-- 
>Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
>
>   

-- 
Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com 

Re: Get results in multiple orders (multiple boosts)

Posted by Luca Dall'Osto <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID>.
Hello Rick,
thanks for your answer.
Yes, I compose solr query from frontend request, but I'm not able to sort by a custom order, only by natural order (for example: sort=category desc, source desc, /*...*/ ).
How do you set a custom sort order in solr?
Thanks

Luca


 

    On Friday, August 4, 2017 7:41 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote:
 

 Luca
I hope you have a web app in front of Solr. It could accept parameters from the browser, then construct the query as necessary to do your sorting. Cheers -- Rick

On August 4, 2017 5:32:31 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>Hello,
>sorry for the late, I was out of my home.
>
>
>In response to Rick: 
>I can't do that because: 
>1) each user should have multiple sort (for example user "A" can sort
>by date and then by category and then by name ...) .
>2) the sort is not natural sort: user has a custom order for a field
>(for example sorting category field of user "A" could be category 10 at
>position 1, category 2 at position 2, category 9500 at position 3,
>category 40 at position 5 ...).
>
>
>In response to Susheel:have you done an example? 
>
>Thanks for your response.
>
>Luca
>
> 
>
>On Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:10 AM, Susheel Kumar
><su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>
> Let me try to put an example for custom sort.
>
>On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote:
>
>> Luca,
>> You can pass a sort parameter in the query. User A could
>sort=date%20desc
>> and user b could sort=foofield%20asc.
>>
>> Maybe query functions can also help with this. Cheers -- Rick
>>
>> On July 19, 2017 4:39:59 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto
>> <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>> >Hello,The problem of build an index is that each user has a custom
>> >source order and category order: are not static orders (for example
>> >user X could have category:5 as most important category but user Y
>> >could have category:9 as most important).
>> >Has anyone ever written a custom sort function in solr?Maybe a link
>of
>> >a tutorial or an example could be very helpful. Thanks
>> >
>> >Luca
>> >
>> >On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:18 PM, alessandro.benedetti
>> ><a....@sease.io> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >"I have different "sort preferences", so I can't build a index and
>use
>> >for
>> >sorting.Maybe I have to sort by category then by source and by
>language
>> >or
>> >by source, then by category and by date"
>> >
>> >I would like to focus on this bit.
>> >It is ok to go for a custom function and sort at query time, but I
>am
>> >curious to explore why an index time solution should not be ok.
>> >You can have these distinct fields :
>> >source_priority
>> >language_priority
>> >category_priority
>> >ect
>> >
>> >This values can be assigned at the documents at indexing time (
>using
>> >for
>> >example a custom update request processor).
>> >Then at query time you can easily sort on those values in a multi
>> >layered
>> >approach :
>> >sort:source_priority desc, category_priority  desc
>> >Of course, if the priority for a source changes quite often or if
>it's
>> >user
>> >dependent, a query time solution would be preferred.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-----
>> >---------------
>> >Alessandro Benedetti
>> >Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
>> >Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
>> >--
>> >View this message in context:
>> >http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-results-in-
>> multiple-orders-multiple-boosts-tp4346304p4346559.html
>> >Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
>
>
>  

-- 
Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com

   

Re: Get results in multiple orders (multiple boosts)

Posted by Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com>.
Luca
I hope you have a web app in front of Solr. It could accept parameters from the browser, then construct the query as necessary to do your sorting. Cheers -- Rick

On August 4, 2017 5:32:31 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>Hello,
>sorry for the late, I was out of my home.
>
>
>In response to Rick: 
>I can't do that because: 
>1) each user should have multiple sort (for example user "A" can sort
>by date and then by category and then by name ...) .
>2) the sort is not natural sort: user has a custom order for a field
>(for example sorting category field of user "A" could be category 10 at
>position 1, category 2 at position 2, category 9500 at position 3,
>category 40 at position 5 ...).
>
>
>In response to Susheel:have you done an example? 
>
>Thanks for your response.
>
>Luca
>
> 
>
>On Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:10 AM, Susheel Kumar
><su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>
> Let me try to put an example for custom sort.
>
>On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote:
>
>> Luca,
>> You can pass a sort parameter in the query. User A could
>sort=date%20desc
>> and user b could sort=foofield%20asc.
>>
>> Maybe query functions can also help with this. Cheers -- Rick
>>
>> On July 19, 2017 4:39:59 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto
>> <te...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>> >Hello,The problem of build an index is that each user has a custom
>> >source order and category order: are not static orders (for example
>> >user X could have category:5 as most important category but user Y
>> >could have category:9 as most important).
>> >Has anyone ever written a custom sort function in solr?Maybe a link
>of
>> >a tutorial or an example could be very helpful. Thanks
>> >
>> >Luca
>> >
>> >On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:18 PM, alessandro.benedetti
>> ><a....@sease.io> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >"I have different "sort preferences", so I can't build a index and
>use
>> >for
>> >sorting.Maybe I have to sort by category then by source and by
>language
>> >or
>> >by source, then by category and by date"
>> >
>> >I would like to focus on this bit.
>> >It is ok to go for a custom function and sort at query time, but I
>am
>> >curious to explore why an index time solution should not be ok.
>> >You can have these distinct fields :
>> >source_priority
>> >language_priority
>> >category_priority
>> >ect
>> >
>> >This values can be assigned at the documents at indexing time (
>using
>> >for
>> >example a custom update request processor).
>> >Then at query time you can easily sort on those values in a multi
>> >layered
>> >approach :
>> >sort:source_priority desc, category_priority  desc
>> >Of course, if the priority for a source changes quite often or if
>it's
>> >user
>> >dependent, a query time solution would be preferred.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-----
>> >---------------
>> >Alessandro Benedetti
>> >Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
>> >Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
>> >--
>> >View this message in context:
>> >http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-results-in-
>> multiple-orders-multiple-boosts-tp4346304p4346559.html
>> >Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
>
>
>   

-- 
Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com