You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by James Strachan <ja...@yahoo.co.uk> on 2002/02/19 16:45:48 UTC
[daemon] JSR 96 support?
I just spotted the daemon project in CVS and wondered if there was any
intention of implementing JSR 96
http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/96.jsp
Also I wonder if JSR 96 will release an open source reference
implementation?
BTW have you seen the Java Service Wrapper?
http://wrapper.sourceforge.net/doc/english/index.html
I've not looked too deep yet at all 3 of these but its on my radar - I'd be
interested in any comments folk have on the pros & cons of the above.
James
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [daemon] JSR 96 support?
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
> > > BTW have you seen the Java Service Wrapper?
> > >
> > > http://wrapper.sourceforge.net/doc/english/index.html
> > >
> > > I've not looked too deep yet at all 3 of these but its on my radar -
I'd
> > be
> > > interested in any comments folk have on the pros & cons of the above.
> >
> > The Java API does the same, and the native components look more or less
> > equivalent. The code for the component had been in the Tomcat CVS for a
> > while.
> > Tomcat is currently using a third project as its NT service wrapper.
It'll
> > be easier to depend on the commons rather than an external project.
>
> Cool - was just a heads up more than anything else.
I didn't know about it, BTW.
Tomcat is using that one:
http://www.alexandriasc.com/software/JavaService/index.html
So there are plenty of these out there (and that's rather a good thing).
As for JSR 96, I'll reserve my judgement on it until they release a public
draft. Pier has been saying that it's bad, that's all I know.
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [daemon] JSR 96 support?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@yahoo.co.uk>.
From: "Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org>
> > I just spotted the daemon project in CVS and wondered if there was any
> > intention of implementing JSR 96
> >
> > http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/96.jsp
> >
> > Also I wonder if JSR 96 will release an open source reference
> > implementation?
>
> I was, but now it's not.
> But of course, we could still decide later to implement the spec even if
> it's not that good. We could also propose a 2.0 version of the API in a
> subsequent JSR.
Cool.
> > BTW have you seen the Java Service Wrapper?
> >
> > http://wrapper.sourceforge.net/doc/english/index.html
> >
> > I've not looked too deep yet at all 3 of these but its on my radar - I'd
> be
> > interested in any comments folk have on the pros & cons of the above.
>
> The Java API does the same, and the native components look more or less
> equivalent. The code for the component had been in the Tomcat CVS for a
> while.
> Tomcat is currently using a third project as its NT service wrapper. It'll
> be easier to depend on the commons rather than an external project.
Cool - was just a heads up more than anything else.
James
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [daemon] JSR 96 support?
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
> I just spotted the daemon project in CVS and wondered if there was any
> intention of implementing JSR 96
>
> http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/96.jsp
>
> Also I wonder if JSR 96 will release an open source reference
> implementation?
I was, but now it's not.
But of course, we could still decide later to implement the spec even if
it's not that good. We could also propose a 2.0 version of the API in a
subsequent JSR.
> BTW have you seen the Java Service Wrapper?
>
> http://wrapper.sourceforge.net/doc/english/index.html
>
> I've not looked too deep yet at all 3 of these but its on my radar - I'd
be
> interested in any comments folk have on the pros & cons of the above.
The Java API does the same, and the native components look more or less
equivalent. The code for the component had been in the Tomcat CVS for a
while.
Tomcat is currently using a third project as its NT service wrapper. It'll
be easier to depend on the commons rather than an external project.
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [daemon] JSR 96 support?
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>.
James Strachan wrote:
>
> I just spotted the daemon project in CVS and wondered if there was any
> intention of implementing JSR 96
yep but it changes. No because:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=101406076431158&w=2
>
> http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/96.jsp
>
> Also I wonder if JSR 96 will release an open source reference
> implementation?
>
> BTW have you seen the Java Service Wrapper?
>
> http://wrapper.sourceforge.net/doc/english/index.html
Sounds nice.
>
> I've not looked too deep yet at all 3 of these but its on my radar - I'd be
> interested in any comments folk have on the pros & cons of the above.
>
> James
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>