You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> on 2014/02/11 01:56:18 UTC
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Andrew:
Please confirm when the soft freeze would be lifted - after RC2 passes ?
Cheers
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes seems so. I've removed the RC0 tag. Let's get this one in.
>
> On Friday, January 24, 2014, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Andy:
> > Looks like HBASE-10412 should be included in RC0
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This was a local issue involving installing the wrong JRE bits into the
> > > wrong location.
> > >
> > > Several builds with Oracle JDK 7u45 have passed cleanly.
> > >
> > > 0.98.0RC tagged!
> > >
> > > I'll spin the bits tomorrow.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> This isn't going to happen today either. I am tracking down why some
> > tests
> > >> for the hbase-server module leave multiple surefire runners hanging
> > around.
> > >> Really weird stuff,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for asking Ted. It was lifted back when RC0 was tagged. Appreciate your cooperation.
> On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:56 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew:
> Please confirm when the soft freeze would be lifted - after RC2 passes ?
>
> Cheers
>
>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Yes seems so. I've removed the RC0 tag. Let's get this one in.
>>
>>> On Friday, January 24, 2014, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Andy:
>>> Looks like HBASE-10412 should be included in RC0
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>> <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This was a local issue involving installing the wrong JRE bits into the
>>>> wrong location.
>>>>
>>>> Several builds with Oracle JDK 7u45 have passed cleanly.
>>>>
>>>> 0.98.0RC tagged!
>>>>
>>>> I'll spin the bits tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>> <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This isn't going to happen today either. I am tracking down why some
>>> tests
>>>>> for the hbase-server module leave multiple surefire runners hanging
>>> around.
>>>>> Really weird stuff,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> - Andy
>>>>
>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein
>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>