More IDE friendly project layout

[Trond Andersen <tr...@gmail.com>]

I would like to have a little bit more IDE layout on the build of
Beehive. Currently the source code generated from XML beans gets
compiled together with source code which is part of the subversion
repository. When I use my IDE I need to specify my dependencies
towards the generated source from XML Beans.

To be concrete: In order to compile FlowControllerFactory.java from
the Netui module I must have a reference to
..config.bean.PageflowConfig which is a generated class. Now I can fix
this by making a dependency towards netui\build\classes\util\ which
includes the compiled version of the XMLBeans classes. The problem is
that I get a duplicate definition now for all the code which is not
generated, but also included into netui\build\classes\util. This is
because now ConfigUtil is defined both as a dependency __and__ a
source file.

I would like the build script to seperate the compiled code that is
the result of compiling generated XMLBeans classes and the compiled
code that is part of Subversion repository. In this way I can make a
dependency to the directory containing compiled generated code and
avoid duplicate definition problem within my IDE.

Is this achievable or will this create lots of other problems ?


Trond Andersen, Invenia,   www.invenia.no

Re: More IDE friendly project layout

[Eddie O'Neil <ek...@bea.com>]

   This discussion is best suited to the dev list, so sending it there.

   <g>



Trond Andersen wrote:
> I would like to have a little bit more IDE layout on the build of
> Beehive. Currently the source code generated from XML beans gets
> compiled together with source code which is part of the subversion
> repository. When I use my IDE I need to specify my dependencies
> towards the generated source from XML Beans.
> 
> To be concrete: In order to compile FlowControllerFactory.java from
> the Netui module I must have a reference to
> ..config.bean.PageflowConfig which is a generated class. Now I can fix
> this by making a dependency towards netui\build\classes\util\ which
> includes the compiled version of the XMLBeans classes. The problem is
> that I get a duplicate definition now for all the code which is not
> generated, but also included into netui\build\classes\util. This is
> because now ConfigUtil is defined both as a dependency __and__ a
> source file.
> 
> I would like the build script to seperate the compiled code that is
> the result of compiling generated XMLBeans classes and the compiled
> code that is part of Subversion repository. In this way I can make a
> dependency to the directory containing compiled generated code and
> avoid duplicate definition problem within my IDE.
> 
> Is this achievable or will this create lots of other problems ?
> 
> 
> Trond Andersen, Invenia,   www.invenia.no
> 

Re: More IDE friendly project layout

[Eddie O'Neil <ek...@bea.com>]

   This discussion is best suited to the dev list, so sending it there.

   <g>



Trond Andersen wrote:
> I would like to have a little bit more IDE layout on the build of
> Beehive. Currently the source code generated from XML beans gets
> compiled together with source code which is part of the subversion
> repository. When I use my IDE I need to specify my dependencies
> towards the generated source from XML Beans.
> 
> To be concrete: In order to compile FlowControllerFactory.java from
> the Netui module I must have a reference to
> ..config.bean.PageflowConfig which is a generated class. Now I can fix
> this by making a dependency towards netui\build\classes\util\ which
> includes the compiled version of the XMLBeans classes. The problem is
> that I get a duplicate definition now for all the code which is not
> generated, but also included into netui\build\classes\util. This is
> because now ConfigUtil is defined both as a dependency __and__ a
> source file.
> 
> I would like the build script to seperate the compiled code that is
> the result of compiling generated XMLBeans classes and the compiled
> code that is part of Subversion repository. In this way I can make a
> dependency to the directory containing compiled generated code and
> avoid duplicate definition problem within my IDE.
> 
> Is this achievable or will this create lots of other problems ?
> 
> 
> Trond Andersen, Invenia,   www.invenia.no
>