You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/03/07 01:23:24 UTC

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2868) Message Driven Beans will not run under the specified "run-as" Subject

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2868.
----------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Committed (in openejb2) in rev 515390.  Thanks for working through a fix for this!

> Message Driven Beans will not run under the specified "run-as" Subject
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-2868
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2868
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: OpenEJB, security
>    Affects Versions: 1.2
>            Reporter: Aman Nanner
>         Assigned To: David Jencks
>         Attachments: mdb-default-subject-interceptor.patch, mdb-run-as.patch
>
>
> If a message driven bean is configured with a "run-as" element, it is being ignored and the message driven bean is not run as the specified Subject.  The MDB would be configured in the ejb-jar.xml as follows:
> ----
>       <message-driven>
>          <display-name>TestMDB</display-name>
>          <ejb-name>TestMDB</ejb-name>
>          <ejb-class>com.acme.ejb.TestMDB</ejb-class>
>          <transaction-type>Bean</transaction-type>
> <message-destination-type>javax.jms.Topic</message-destination-type>
>          <activation-config>
>             <activation-config-property>
> <activation-config-property-name>acknowledgeMode</activation-config-property-name>
> <activation-config-property-value>Auto-acknowledge</activation-config-property-value>
>             </activation-config-property>
>             <activation-config-property>
> <activation-config-property-name>messageSelector</activation-config-property-name>
>                <activation-config-property-value>JOB_CODE =
> 'FOO'</activation-config-property-value>
>             </activation-config-property>
>             <activation-config-property>
> <activation-config-property-name>subscriptionDurability</activation-config-property-name>
> <activation-config-property-value>NonDurable</activation-config-property-value>
>             </activation-config-property>
>          </activation-config>
>          <ejb-ref>
>             <ejb-ref-name>ejb/common/TestEJB</ejb-ref-name>
>             <ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type>
>             <home>com.acme.ejb.TestHome</home>
>             <remote>com.acme.ejb.TestRemote</remote>
>             <ejb-link>TestEJB</ejb-link>
>          </ejb-ref>
>          <security-identity>
>             <run-as>
>                <role-name>TESTROLE</role-name>
>             </run-as>
>          </security-identity>
>       </message-driven>
> ----
> Upon inspection of the org.apache.openejb.mdb.DefaaultMdbContainer class, it is noted that the EjbRunAsInterceptor is not configured as part of the invocation step (as it is in org.apache.openejb.slsb.DefaultStatelessEjbContainer).  Therefore, the run-as Subject is never being set as part of the Caller stack.
> I added the EjbRunAsInterceptor into the invocation stack and rebuilt Geronimo, but this didn't completely fix the problem.  The EjbRunAsInterceptor is now being called, and the Subject is being set as the "next" caller in the ContextManager's caller stack.  However, the EjbIdentityInterceptor runs next, and authorizes the invocation under the "current" caller, not the "next" caller.  Thus, the run-as Subject does NOT perform the invocation.
> I'm not sure what the best way is to fix this without impacting everything else.  If somebody with more knowledge in this area has a good idea, I can try it and submit a patch.
> Also note that this problem seems to imply that the "run-as" functionality wouldn't work with session EJBs either (I haven't tried to verify this).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.