You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@weex.apache.org by gurisxie <27...@qq.com> on 2017/11/27 02:20:45 UTC

回复: Community building?

+1, Github issue is lightweight to developer.




------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "misakuo";<mi...@apache.org>;
发送时间: 2017年11月24日(星期五) 晚上6:23
收件人: "dev"<de...@weex.incubator.apache.org>;

主题: Re: Community building?



+1, Github issue is very helpful to improve the community activity

2017-11-24 18:16 GMT+08:00 xing zhang <zh...@gmail.com>:

> +1, It will be much more convenient to communicate among developers.
>
> 2017-11-24 17:58 GMT+08:00 陈泽峰 <ch...@ymt360.com>:
>
> > I think it's good for Weex Community to open github issues.It's a easy
> way
> > for Weex users to discuss features or report a bug.
> >   Only thing I worry about is the language issue.Too many github issues
> > were committed and replied in chinese, and it seems not got controled in
> > the old Weex github project.Will it be a problem that may stop Weex go
> > farther in Apache?
> >
> >
> >   Anyway,I still say yes to github issues.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------ Original ------------------
> > From:  "Hanks Zhang"<zh...@gmail.com>;
> > Date:  Fri, Nov 24, 2017 04:33 PM
> > To:  "Weex问题列表"<de...@weex.incubator.apache.org>;
> >
> > Subject:  Re: Community building?
> >
> >
> > Hi Raphael,
> >
> > Sorry for reminding you again. I really want to be informed about the
> > process of opening GitHub issues.
> >
> > Looking forward to further discussion.
> >
> > Best regards, Hanks
> >
> > 2017-11-10 13:06 GMT+08:00 Adam Feng <cx...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > +1,  We can give it a try,  for Github issues are easier to manage.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > Adam Feng
> > >
> > > On 24 Oct 2017, 1:29 PM +0800, Raphael Bircher <
> rbircherapache@gmail.com
> > >,
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > > First of all, thanks for the work. We at Apache tend to do not a vote
> > on
> > > > such a Topic. This one is a typical case for lazy consensus.
> > > >
> > > > We let this thread now open and allow a discussion. It gives us the
> > > chance
> > > > to make a good proposal even better. You have not this chance if you
> > > vote,
> > > > you can only say yes or no. That's the reason we normally avoid
> voting
> > > (if
> > > > possible)
> > > >
> > > > Sometimes you have no discussion on a proposal, this means for as:
> "all
> > > > are happy". Often people who are happy with the proposal simply give
> a
> > > +1,
> > > > to show the support.
> > > >
> > > > If a discussion starts, we discuss it out and try to rich consensus
> > > within
> > > > the community. Normally this goes much quicker then anyone expect. If
> > the
> > > > discussion is settle down. the proposal is accepted.
> > > >
> > > > I will answer to the other points in a separate mail
> > > >
> > > > Regards, Raphael
> > > >
> > > > Am .10.2017, 06:39 Uhr, schrieb Hanks Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Raphael
> > > > >
> > > > > As far as I know, our workflow is adjusted, documents are
> reorganized
> > > and
> > > > > assigned to the specific person to rewritten them. We all take part
> > in
> > > > > it.
> > > > > After all the documents are ready we'll deploy the new website to
> the
> > > > > server.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. The "contribution" related documents [1] are finished and being
> > > > > reviewed.
> > > > > 2. The "<image>" component document is treated as the template,
> > > > > its structure and details are under adjusting.
> > > > > 3. The tutorial document [2] is on the halfway.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is another thing we are discussing: whether to use GitHub to
> > > manage
> > > > > issues.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think is more convenient to use GitHub issue if we have
> permissions
> > > to
> > > > > manage them, such as close, assign, add labels, etc. We can also
> use
> > a
> > > > > bot
> > > > > to close or fast reply issues, in order to keep the quality and
> > remove
> > > > > redundancy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Should we start a vote on this question?
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex-site/pull/2
> > > > > [2]
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex-site/blob/
> > > master/source/guide/index.md
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2017-10-24 11:50 GMT+08:00 Raphael Bircher <
> rbircherapache@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi everybody
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can someone bring me update about the community building efforts
> at
> > > the
> > > > > > weex project? Thanks a load!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards Raphael
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
> > >
> >
>