You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> on 2011/08/24 01:11:00 UTC

plan for HBASE-1730

See if the following plan is acceptable:
1. After Stack finishes second part of review, Nileema would work out a new
patch
2. Test results at FB should be published
3. 1730 doesn't need to implement master failover at this moment
4. Integrate 1730 to TRUNK
5. Supporting master failover can be completed in HBASE-4213 after 1730 goes
in

Please comment.

Re: plan for HBASE-1730

Posted by Subbu M Iyer <ms...@gmail.com>.

I agree with this strategy.

thanks
Subbu

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> See if the following plan is acceptable:
> 1. After Stack finishes second part of review, Nileema would work out a new
> patch
> 2. Test results at FB should be published
> 3. 1730 doesn't need to implement master failover at this moment
> 4. Integrate 1730 to TRUNK
> 5. Supporting master failover can be completed in HBASE-4213 after 1730 goes
> in
>
> Please comment.
>