You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Knut Anders Hatlen <Kn...@Sun.COM> on 2006/03/31 09:52:30 UTC

Re: [doc: System stored procedures] WAS: Should we vote on it?

Jeff Levitt <de...@mylevita.com> writes:

> --- "David W. Van Couvering"
> <Da...@Sun.COM> wrote:
> <snip>
>> 
>> Dumb question: are system stored procedures in the
>> user documentation? 
>> If not, perhaps they should be Private Stable rather
>> than Stable?  If 
>> they're not documented, what is driving the
>> requirement that they be 
>> stable - client/server compatibility?
> </snip>
>
> Is this what you were looking for David?  This is in
> the Reference Manual:
>
> http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/ref/crefsqlbuiltinsystemprocedures.html

These are not the only system procedures. The ones in the SYSIBM
schema are not documented, but they should be stable as well so that
we don't break client/server compatibility.

-- 
Knut Anders