You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Mark Slater <ma...@analogsoftware.com> on 2006/03/25 11:31:04 UTC
Strange non-failure error during unit testing
I'm not sure if this matters (as in, for all I know, its a hiccup in
the JVM and nothing to do with Jackrabbit at all), but I just got a
very strange error in the test phase of the build process:
[junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
0.359 sec
[junit] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.lock.TestAll
[junit] Tests run: 23, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
6.813 sec
[junit] Exception in thread "Thread-4"
java.util.NoSuchElementException
[junit] at
org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap
$ReferenceEntrySetIterator.nextEntry(AbstractReferenceMap.java:772)
[junit] at
org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap
$ReferenceValuesIterator.next(AbstractReferenceMap.java:829)
[junit] at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl.shutdown
(RepositoryImpl.java:858)
[junit] at
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepository.shutdown
(BindableRepository.java:257)
[junit] at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepository
$1.run(BindableRepository.java:133)
[junit] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.nodetype.TestAll
[junit] Tests run: 99, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
24.768 sec
[junit] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.observation.TestAll
[junit] Tests run: 40, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
10.539 sec
There were no errors that I could find before this, or after it, and
no mention was made of it in any JUnit output files or log files that
I could find. At the end, maven reported a successful build.
I'm not particularly worried about it... a build I did just a few
minutes before had no errors. The only thing that changed between the
two was the removal of some logging statements in
CustomNodeTypeConfig (I was trying to track down a null input stream
exception).
On one hand I thought about dismissing this out of hand since it
doesn't seem to be reproducible (I tried a few times), but on the
other, some of the nastiest bugs I've ever had to track down were
sporadic and only showed up once in a very long while.
Mark
Re: Strange non-failure error during unit testing
Posted by Stefan Guggisberg <st...@gmail.com>.
hi mark
thanks for reporting this issue! it's indeed a bug. i fixed it in
svn r389129.
cheers
stefan
On 3/25/06, Mark Slater <ma...@analogsoftware.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure if this matters (as in, for all I know, its a hiccup in
> the JVM and nothing to do with Jackrabbit at all), but I just got a
> very strange error in the test phase of the build process:
>
> [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
> 0.359 sec
> [junit] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.lock.TestAll
> [junit] Tests run: 23, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
> 6.813 sec
> [junit] Exception in thread "Thread-4"
> java.util.NoSuchElementException
> [junit] at
> org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap
> $ReferenceEntrySetIterator.nextEntry(AbstractReferenceMap.java:772)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap
> $ReferenceValuesIterator.next(AbstractReferenceMap.java:829)
> [junit] at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl.shutdown
> (RepositoryImpl.java:858)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepository.shutdown
> (BindableRepository.java:257)
> [junit] at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepository
> $1.run(BindableRepository.java:133)
> [junit] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.nodetype.TestAll
> [junit] Tests run: 99, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
> 24.768 sec
> [junit] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.observation.TestAll
> [junit] Tests run: 40, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
> 10.539 sec
>
> There were no errors that I could find before this, or after it, and
> no mention was made of it in any JUnit output files or log files that
> I could find. At the end, maven reported a successful build.
>
> I'm not particularly worried about it... a build I did just a few
> minutes before had no errors. The only thing that changed between the
> two was the removal of some logging statements in
> CustomNodeTypeConfig (I was trying to track down a null input stream
> exception).
>
> On one hand I thought about dismissing this out of hand since it
> doesn't seem to be reproducible (I tried a few times), but on the
> other, some of the nastiest bugs I've ever had to track down were
> sporadic and only showed up once in a very long while.
>
> Mark
>