You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hawq.apache.org by Atri Sharma <at...@apache.org> on 2015/11/11 09:41:41 UTC

CTR vs RTC

Hi Team,

Apologies if this is repost or have been already discussed.

I feel we should outline the commit policy at this point and it will ease
out further processes for us.

Commit to review -- committers commit and commit mails are watches by other
community members. Anybody can raise concerns if seen.

Review to commit -- review signoffs are needed before committer can commit
patch.

Thoughts please?

Regards,

Atri

Re: CTR vs RTC

Posted by Shivram Mani <sh...@gmail.com>.

Atri, there was a discussion on RTC vs CTR in this forum with the subject
"Staying with RTC (review-then-commit) rule".
You can refer to the current commit/review process here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HAWQ/Contributing+to+HAWQ

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Atri Sharma <at...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Team,
>
> Apologies if this is repost or have been already discussed.
>
> I feel we should outline the commit policy at this point and it will ease
> out further processes for us.
>
> Commit to review -- committers commit and commit mails are watches by other
> community members. Anybody can raise concerns if seen.
>
> Review to commit -- review signoffs are needed before committer can commit
> patch.
>
> Thoughts please?
>
> Regards,
>
> Atri
>

-- 
shivram mani