You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Michael Dürig <md...@apache.org> on 2017/04/03 07:19:06 UTC
Re: Moving to Java 8
On 31.03.17 13:29, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2017-02-15 12:17, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I understand that we might not be able to move to Java 8 just yet, but I
>> felt it would be good to capture information related to this topic in
>> Jira (so that we can link other related tickets).
>>
>> So feel free to provide feedback (and include more information) in
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5664
>>
>> Best regards, Julian
>
> So far I didn't see anybody unhappy with a move to required Java 8 for
> Oak 1.7 (unstable) and Oak 1.8 (once we get there in ~12 months). Thus,
> I propose that we actually make the switch now.
+1 for 1.8.
>
> Does anybody thing we need a vote?
No need for a vote IMO, (lazy) consensus here should be sufficient.
Michael
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>
Re: Moving to Java 8
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
On 2017-04-03 09:19, Michael D�rig wrote:
> On 31.03.17 13:29, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2017-02-15 12:17, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I understand that we might not be able to move to Java 8 just yet, but I
>>> felt it would be good to capture information related to this topic in
>>> Jira (so that we can link other related tickets).
>>>
>>> So feel free to provide feedback (and include more information) in
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5664
>>>
>>> Best regards, Julian
>>
>> So far I didn't see anybody unhappy with a move to required Java 8 for
>> Oak 1.7 (unstable) and Oak 1.8 (once we get there in ~12 months). Thus,
>> I propose that we actually make the switch now.
>
> +1 for 1.8.
>
>>
>> Does anybody thing we need a vote?
>
> No need for a vote IMO, (lazy) consensus here should be sufficient.
>
> Michael
OK. I assigned the ticket to me, and will make the switch later this week.
Best regards, Julian