You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> on 2004/07/28 12:02:18 UTC

Struts 1.2.2

Wheels on other carts started to squeak this week, and I haven't tagged or rolled 1.2.2 yet. 

One thing I'd like to do first is to link our "Acquiring" page to the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet. If anyone else has a clue, please feel free to jump in. 

Otherwise, I'd like to apply 

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30300

and update the Release Notes, but, AFAIK, that's it. 

-Ted.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by robert burrell donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
On 2 Aug 2004, at 02:33, Ted Husted wrote:

> I think we'll just have to go with whatever is simplest, since no one 
> seems to have much time to volunteer to the process. Apparently, that 
> would be the Maven approach.

yep :)

if you take a look at the maven url 
(http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/maven/binaries/maven-1.0.zip), 
you'll see that actually the maven specific bit on the end 
(maven/binaries/maven-1.0.zip) is passed through to the closer.cgi 
script (www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi). assuming that you're going to 
be creating a new directory called struts in /www/www.apache.org/dist, 
then you should be able to just pass the relative path from that 
directory into the scripts.

i would recommend that you create open pgp compatible signatures for 
your releases (as well as MD5s) and also add the MD5 values for the 
release to the acquiring page (so that users can easily find them). it 
is very strongly recommended that users should check the md5 sums for 
all downloads (from the mirrors) so i'd advocate saying something about 
that on the acquiring page as well.

i'll try to make reading the struts list a priority for the next few 
days, so if you have any questions or problems ask away.

> I appreciate your help in this, robert.

glad to be of assistance :)

- robert


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
I think we'll just have to go with whatever is simplest, since no one seems to have much time to volunteer to the process. Apparently, that would be the Maven approach. 

I appreciate your help in this, robert. 

-Ted.

On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:19:32 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> hi ted
>
> maven uses the standard apache fallback script (closer.cgi). this
> is very, very to easy to use (just pass the release path through to
> the script) but suffers from some drawbacks (the sums and
> signatures are not readily available and no attempt is made to
> educate users about the importance of checking sums when
> downloading).
>
> ant uses a custom page which is then fed through the standard
> apache mirroring script which adds the mirrors to it. this is a
> little more difficult and requires infrastructure karma (craig, i
> think, should have sufficient).
>
> i prefer the ant-style download site but i know some other folks in
> jakartaland prefer the closer.cgi style page. maybe a vote or a
> pool for which style would be the best way forward...?
>
> (in any case) if you let me know which style you'd prefer, i'd be
> glad to provide some instructions about how to go about setting the
> download up.
>
> - robert
>
> On 29 Jul 2004, at 23:26, Ted Husted wrote:
>
>> I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or
>> what Maven does would be fine, robert.
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:35:15 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>>
>>> On 28 Jul 2004, at 11:02, Ted Husted wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> One thing I'd like to do first is to link our "Acquiring"
>>>> page to  the Apache mirroring system, so that the
>>>> distribution hooks up to  the preferred place. I haven't
>>>> looked into how that is done yet.  If anyone else has a clue,
>>>> please feel free to jump in.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> hi ted
>>>
>>> i know a little about this. what kind of thing had you in mind?
>>>
>>> would you want the Acquiring page to handle finding an
>>> appropriate  mirror and giving an url to it? or would you be
>>> happy with a link  to a generic page?
>>>
>>> - robert
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----  - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
>>> unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For  additional commands, e-mail:
>>> dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by robert burrell donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
hi ted

maven uses the standard apache fallback script (closer.cgi). this is 
very, very to easy to use (just pass the release path through to the 
script) but suffers from some drawbacks (the sums and signatures are 
not readily available and no attempt is made to educate users about the 
importance of checking sums when downloading).

ant uses a custom page which is then fed through the standard apache 
mirroring script which adds the mirrors to it. this is a little more 
difficult and requires infrastructure karma (craig, i think, should 
have sufficient).

i prefer the ant-style download site but i know some other folks in 
jakartaland prefer the closer.cgi style page. maybe a vote or a pool 
for which style would be the best way forward...?

(in any case) if you let me know which style you'd prefer, i'd be glad 
to provide some instructions about how to go about setting the download 
up.

- robert

On 29 Jul 2004, at 23:26, Ted Husted wrote:

> I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what 
> Maven does would be fine, robert.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:35:15 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>>  On 28 Jul 2004, at 11:02, Ted Husted wrote:
>>
>>  <snip>
>>
>>>  One thing I'd like to do first is to link our "Acquiring" page to
>>>  the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to
>>>  the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet.
>>>  If anyone else has a clue, please feel free to jump in.
>>>
>>
>>  hi ted
>>
>>  i know a little about this. what kind of thing had you in mind?
>>
>>  would you want the Acquiring page to handle finding an appropriate
>>  mirror and giving an url to it? or would you be happy with a link
>>  to a generic page?
>>
>>  - robert
>>
>>
>>  --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
>>  additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by robert burrell donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
On 2 Aug 2004, at 23:20, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:44:21 +0100, robert burrell donkin
> <rd...@apache.org> wrote:

<snip>

>> there's nothing really difficult about the config file but you'll need
>> the right karma. (i suspect that members would be granted on request.)
>> craig should have the karma or you could post a patch up for
>> infrastructure in JIRA (but remember to do this ahead of time).
>
> Is the naming in this file documented somewhere?

not that i know of.

> It seems that there
> is a mapping between paths and entry names, but I'm guessing that it's
> more than just a naming convention.

i think that it's just a mapping between the input paths and the files 
to the processed. IIRC the script reads in mapping to find out which 
file should be read but you'd probably be better doing what i did and 
reading the source (your python can't be any worse than mine ;) since 
all i recall is that everything turned out be as straight forward as it 
looked. (i have no memory for stuff that turned out to be easy.)

- robert


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by Martin Cooper <mf...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:44:21 +0100, robert burrell donkin
<rd...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2 Aug 2004, at 22:13, Martin Cooper wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:26:27 -0400, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >> I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what
> >> Maven does would be fine, robert.
> >
> > I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but I guess I'm not clear
> > on where either Ant or Maven come in to getting an Acquiring page
> > working with the mirrors.
> 
> ted brought them up as examples of templates that he'd be happy to see
> struts follow.

Aha, now I understand. I was reading "Ant or Maven, the tools" instead
of "Ant or Maven, the communities". ;-)

> > I took a quick look at this over the weekend, and all it seems to take
> > is the appropriate pair of .cgi and .html files (the latter with the
> > necessary substitution variables in it), and an entry in the
> > mirrors.conf file to hook up the .cgi file. I hacked up a couple of
> > test files (see the test dir on the site), but I don't know if I have
> > the right perms (and the right understanding!) to modify the config
> > file.
> >
> > Is there more to this than meets the eye?
> 
> that's pretty much it. i never claimed that it was difficult :)

;-)

> there's nothing really difficult about the config file but you'll need
> the right karma. (i suspect that members would be granted on request.)
> craig should have the karma or you could post a patch up for
> infrastructure in JIRA (but remember to do this ahead of time).

Is the naming in this file documented somewhere? It seems that there
is a mapping between paths and entry names, but I'm guessing that it's
more than just a naming convention.

Thanks, Robert.

--
Martin Cooper


> 
> 
> 
> - robert
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by robert burrell donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
On 2 Aug 2004, at 22:13, Martin Cooper wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:26:27 -0400, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> 
> wrote:
>> I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what 
>> Maven does would be fine, robert.
>
> I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but I guess I'm not clear
> on where either Ant or Maven come in to getting an Acquiring page
> working with the mirrors.

ted brought them up as examples of templates that he'd be happy to see 
struts follow.

> I took a quick look at this over the weekend, and all it seems to take
> is the appropriate pair of .cgi and .html files (the latter with the
> necessary substitution variables in it), and an entry in the
> mirrors.conf file to hook up the .cgi file. I hacked up a couple of
> test files (see the test dir on the site), but I don't know if I have
> the right perms (and the right understanding!) to modify the config
> file.
>
> Is there more to this than meets the eye?

that's pretty much it. i never claimed that it was difficult :)

there's nothing really difficult about the config file but you'll need 
the right karma. (i suspect that members would be granted on request.) 
craig should have the karma or you could post a patch up for 
infrastructure in JIRA (but remember to do this ahead of time).

- robert


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by Martin Cooper <mf...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:26:27 -0400, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what Maven does would be fine, robert.

I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but I guess I'm not clear
on where either Ant or Maven come in to getting an Acquiring page
working with the mirrors.

I took a quick look at this over the weekend, and all it seems to take
is the appropriate pair of .cgi and .html files (the latter with the
necessary substitution variables in it), and an entry in the
mirrors.conf file to hook up the .cgi file. I hacked up a couple of
test files (see the test dir on the site), but I don't know if I have
the right perms (and the right understanding!) to modify the config
file.

Is there more to this than meets the eye?

--
Martin Cooper


> 
> -Ted.
> 
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:35:15 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> 
> 
> >�On 28 Jul 2004, at 11:02, Ted Husted wrote:
> >
> >�<snip>
> >
> >>�One thing I'd like to do first is to link our "Acquiring" page to
> >>�the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to
> >>�the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet.
> >>�If anyone else has a clue, please feel free to jump in.
> >>
> >
> >�hi ted
> >
> >�i know a little about this. what kind of thing had you in mind?
> >
> >�would you want the Acquiring page to handle finding an appropriate
> >�mirror and giving an url to it? or would you be happy with a link
> >�to a generic page?
> >
> >�- robert
> >
> >
> >�--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >�- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> >�additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what Maven does would be fine, robert.

-Ted.

On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:35:15 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>�On 28 Jul 2004, at 11:02, Ted Husted wrote:
>
>�<snip>
>
>>�One thing I'd like to do first is to link our "Acquiring" page to
>>�the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to
>>�the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet.
>>�If anyone else has a clue, please feel free to jump in.
>>
>
>�hi ted
>
>�i know a little about this. what kind of thing had you in mind?
>
>�would you want the Acquiring page to handle finding an appropriate
>�mirror and giving an url to it? or would you be happy with a link
>�to a generic page?
>
>�- robert
>
>
>�--------------------------------------------------------------------
>�- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
>�additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by robert burrell donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
On 28 Jul 2004, at 11:02, Ted Husted wrote:

<snip>

> One thing I'd like to do first is to link our "Acquiring" page to the 
> Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to the 
> preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet. If anyone 
> else has a clue, please feel free to jump in.

hi ted

i know a little about this. what kind of thing had you in mind?

would you want the Acquiring page to handle finding an appropriate 
mirror and giving an url to it? or would you be happy with a link to a 
generic page?

- robert


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by Vic Cekvenich <ce...@portalvu.com>.
Sounds very cool!
.V


Ted Husted wrote:
<snip>
> 
> One thing I'd like to do first is to link our "Acquiring" page to the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet. If anyone else has a clue, please feel free to jump in. 
> 
> Otherwise, I'd like to apply 
> 
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30300
> 
> and update the Release Notes, but, AFAIK, that's it. 
> 
> -Ted.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
GREAT!!! I just removed the tag.  Thanks for the help.
I assume the wiki was incorrect.  I'll update it.



--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Germuska" <Jo...@Germuska.com>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]


> >  * I've tagged cvs with STRUTS_1_2_2 (from the wiki, or should
> >     that have been 1_1_2?)
> >     Either way, I've found a few items I want to update, can I remove
> >     or move the tag?  Or just retag?
> 
> You can do both.  You can move a tag with:
> 
> this will apply the tag to the versions you have currently checked 
> out from CVS (presumably CVS HEAD)
> cvs tag -F STRUTS_1_2_2
> 
> this will remove the tag
> cvs tag -d STRUTS_1_2_2
> 
> this will apply the tag to CVS HEAD without any question
> cvs rtag -d $APACHE_CVSROOT -F STRUTS_1_2_2 jakarta-struts
> (you have to specify the CVSROOT in this case because rtag is not 
> relative to any local sandbox)
> 
> For the cvs tag commands, you can specify certain files or, by 
> default, apply the command to all files in the current directory and 
> subdirectories.
> 
> Hope this helps.  Thanks for taking the baton!
> 
> Joe
> 
> -- 
> Joe Germuska            
> Joe@Germuska.com  
> http://blog.germuska.com    
> "In fact, when I die, if I don't hear 'A Love Supreme,' I'll turn 
> back; I'll know I'm in the wrong place."
>     - Carlos Santana



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by Joe Germuska <Jo...@Germuska.com>.
>  * I've tagged cvs with STRUTS_1_2_2 (from the wiki, or should
>     that have been 1_1_2?)
>     Either way, I've found a few items I want to update, can I remove
>     or move the tag?  Or just retag?

You can do both.  You can move a tag with:

this will apply the tag to the versions you have currently checked 
out from CVS (presumably CVS HEAD)
cvs tag -F STRUTS_1_2_2

this will remove the tag
cvs tag -d STRUTS_1_2_2

this will apply the tag to CVS HEAD without any question
cvs rtag -d $APACHE_CVSROOT -F STRUTS_1_2_2 jakarta-struts
(you have to specify the CVSROOT in this case because rtag is not 
relative to any local sandbox)

For the cvs tag commands, you can specify certain files or, by 
default, apply the command to all files in the current directory and 
subdirectories.

Hope this helps.  Thanks for taking the baton!

Joe

-- 
Joe Germuska            
Joe@Germuska.com  
http://blog.germuska.com    
"In fact, when I die, if I don't hear 'A Love Supreme,' I'll turn 
back; I'll know I'm in the wrong place."
    - Carlos Santana

Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
The notes are fine, James. I've been updating them all along. 

But I do usually do just run "maven site" to get them. Occasionally, it doesn't work. May be network traffic.

But, the notes we have are fine. I last updated them on 08/13. Everything since then looks like routine tweaks.

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:02:38 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> Also, I'm trying to get all the commit notes since 1.1.
>
> maven site:gen doesn't work for me.
>
> How do you guys do it?



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
Also, I'm trying to get all the commit notes since 1.1.

maven site:gen doesn't work for me.

How do you guys do it?



--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Mitchell" <jm...@apache.org>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]


> > On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:05:13 -0400, James Mitchell
<jm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > Ok, I accept the challenge.
> > >
> > > If you could clarify something for me though:
> > >  * IIRC, this release needs to be voted GA by our [committers/PMC]
> > >    before we can announce the release as GA.
> > >    Has that vote happened?
> >
> > No, not yet.
>
> Ok, I'll send out a vote.
>
> >
> > >  * What is the status of the validator 1.1.3.  Ted's entry in the
> > >    wiki mirrors my own suspicion.  Any clarity would help me here.
> > >    The release doesn't appear on ibiblio, so we (commons folks)
> > >    need to make that happen as well.
> >
> > It's effectively release. The distribution is up and the web site has
> > been updated. I just need to send out the announcement (which I'll do
> > today).
> >
> > >  * Do I need to close or mark 'later' all the bugs in bugzilla?
> >
> > Only if you feel like going back and reopening them all later. ;-)
>
> Aaaaalrighty then, never mind. :D
>
> >
> > >  * I've tagged cvs with STRUTS_1_2_2 (from the wiki, or should
> > >    that have been 1_1_2?)
> > >    Either way, I've found a few items I want to update, can I remove
> > >    or move the tag?  Or just retag?
> >
> > Tagging HEAD as STRUTS_1_2_2 is right, I believe. Moving the tag on
> > individual files is easy enough, assuming there aren't lots of them.
>
> I'll leave off the tag until I finish updating the docs.
>
> > See:
> >
> > https://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/cvs-1.11.17/cvs_4.html#SEC51
> >
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> >
>
>
>
> --
> James Mitchell
> Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> EdgeTech, Inc.
> 678.910.8017
> AIM: jmitchtx
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
That should be 

  cvs.apache.org:/www/cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/

So on the cvs.apache.org server, copy the distribution files to /www/cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/v1.2.2/. 

Since I was already in there, double-checking, I went ahead and made the directory. So, it's waiting for you :)

And if there is still any controversy about the tag, we are in fact at release 1_2_2

Struts 1.1 was the first and last release in the 1.1.x series.

The 1.2.0 release died on the vine. The 1.2.1 release was close, but no cigar. So, we're up to 1.2.2. 

-T.

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:26:05 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> Ok, A3 says to upload to /dist/struts, but there is nothing in
> /dist. Is that on purpose?  Is that a staging area that some
> process polls and does something with it?
>
> Ok, I'm heading home to coach my kids soccer practice, and I'll be
> back on the horse after that. Thanks for your help
>
>
> --
> James Mitchell
> Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> EdgeTech, Inc.
> 678.910.8017
> AIM: jmitchtx
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:00:07 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Ok, I'll send out a vote.
>>
> We can't vote on something that doesn't exist yet :)
>
> Go through A1 to A6 in the check list THEN call for the vote.
>
> The releases default to Alpha, and then we can grade it Beta or GA
> by majority vote.
>
> (Or downgrade it later, if we discover a buried issue.)
>
> Once it receives the GA stamp  (which make take a few days), then
> we can do the second part of the release checklist.
>
> This is essentially the 1.2.1 release with some minor tweaks, so I
> would expect it to go GA quickly.
>
> -Ted.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
Ok, A3 says to upload to /dist/struts, but there is nothing in /dist.
Is that on purpose?  Is that a staging area that some process polls and does
something with it?

Ok, I'm heading home to coach my kids soccer practice, and I'll be back on
the horse after that.
Thanks for your help


--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]


On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:00:07 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> Ok, I'll send out a vote.

We can't vote on something that doesn't exist yet :)

Go through A1 to A6 in the check list THEN call for the vote.

The releases default to Alpha, and then we can grade it Beta or GA by
majority vote.

(Or downgrade it later, if we discover a buried issue.)

Once it receives the GA stamp  (which make take a few days), then we can do
the second part of the release checklist.

This is essentially the 1.2.1 release with some minor tweaks, so I would
expect it to go GA quickly.

-Ted.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:00:07 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> Ok, I'll send out a vote.

We can't vote on something that doesn't exist yet :) 

Go through A1 to A6 in the check list THEN call for the vote. 

The releases default to Alpha, and then we can grade it Beta or GA by majority vote. 

(Or downgrade it later, if we discover a buried issue.)

Once it receives the GA stamp  (which make take a few days), then we can do the second part of the release checklist. 

This is essentially the 1.2.1 release with some minor tweaks, so I would expect it to go GA quickly.

-Ted.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:05:13 -0400, James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>
wrote:
> > Ok, I accept the challenge.
> >
> > If you could clarify something for me though:
> >  * IIRC, this release needs to be voted GA by our [committers/PMC]
> >    before we can announce the release as GA.
> >    Has that vote happened?
>
> No, not yet.

Ok, I'll send out a vote.

>
> >  * What is the status of the validator 1.1.3.  Ted's entry in the
> >    wiki mirrors my own suspicion.  Any clarity would help me here.
> >    The release doesn't appear on ibiblio, so we (commons folks)
> >    need to make that happen as well.
>
> It's effectively release. The distribution is up and the web site has
> been updated. I just need to send out the announcement (which I'll do
> today).
>
> >  * Do I need to close or mark 'later' all the bugs in bugzilla?
>
> Only if you feel like going back and reopening them all later. ;-)

Aaaaalrighty then, never mind. :D

>
> >  * I've tagged cvs with STRUTS_1_2_2 (from the wiki, or should
> >    that have been 1_1_2?)
> >    Either way, I've found a few items I want to update, can I remove
> >    or move the tag?  Or just retag?
>
> Tagging HEAD as STRUTS_1_2_2 is right, I believe. Moving the tag on
> individual files is easy enough, assuming there aren't lots of them.

I'll leave off the tag until I finish updating the docs.

> See:
>
> https://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/cvs-1.11.17/cvs_4.html#SEC51
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>



--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by Martin Cooper <mf...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:05:13 -0400, James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok, I accept the challenge.
> 
> If you could clarify something for me though:
>  * IIRC, this release needs to be voted GA by our [committers/PMC]
>    before we can announce the release as GA.
>    Has that vote happened?

No, not yet.

>  * What is the status of the validator 1.1.3.  Ted's entry in the
>    wiki mirrors my own suspicion.  Any clarity would help me here.
>    The release doesn't appear on ibiblio, so we (commons folks)
>    need to make that happen as well.

It's effectively release. The distribution is up and the web site has
been updated. I just need to send out the announcement (which I'll do
today).

>  * Do I need to close or mark 'later' all the bugs in bugzilla?

Only if you feel like going back and reopening them all later. ;-)

>  * I've tagged cvs with STRUTS_1_2_2 (from the wiki, or should
>    that have been 1_1_2?)
>    Either way, I've found a few items I want to update, can I remove
>    or move the tag?  Or just retag?

Tagging HEAD as STRUTS_1_2_2 is right, I believe. Moving the tag on
individual files is easy enough, assuming there aren't lots of them.
See:

https://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/cvs-1.11.17/cvs_4.html#SEC51

--
Martin Cooper


> 
> --
> James Mitchell
> Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> EdgeTech, Inc.
> 678.910.8017
> AIM: jmitchtx
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
> 
> Run with it, James. If anyone wants to pitch in, they can. But this doesn't
> have to be a one-person job. (Though there's not much to A1-A6.) Just keep
> the wiki page (that Niall started) updated.
> 
> We are all "jointly and severally" responsible for Struts. Anyone can roll a
> release whenever they like. The only question is whether it will earn the
> Apache Struts brand through a majority vote (3 +1s, more +1s than -1s). The
> release plans and checklists are just a means to that end.
> 
> -Ted.
> 
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:55:58 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> > Ok, I've finished testing the apps and all. What can I do now? Do
> > you want me to take over and finish this? I though Niall or someone
> > was working on it. Could be my bad memory, anyway, I'll do it if
> > you guys don't mind me asking stupid 'release manager' newbie
> > questions :P (and I'll keep it on-list for others who want to do
> > it later). I'll even try to keep a log and throw a page on the
> > wiki.
> >
> >
> > --
> > James Mitchell
> > Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> > EdgeTech, Inc.
> > 678.910.8017
> > AIM: jmitchtx
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
> > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:47 AM
> > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
> >
> >
> > No, I'm not running with the torch, I'm trying to pass the baton. :)
> >
> > If you (or anyone else) has run the Cactus tests since yesterday's
> > code changes, please feel free to update the Wiki.
> >
> > * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease122
> >
> > Then we'd be down to play testing the bundled applications and
> > Release Checklist steps A1-A6.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:59:06 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> >
> >> Am I to assume the recent cvs activity to be what I think it
> >> means?
> >>
> >> I was just reading over the release instructions and was about to
> >> volunteer some time, but if you're running with the torch, I'll
> >> wait till next time. (besides, I would need some hand-holding for
> >> the first time anyway)
> >>
> >> Not sure if this help you, but I've already refreshed my local
> >> cvs and run the full gauntlet of tests and they all pass. I also
> >> ran the distribution without problems. (this was prior to your
> >> updating the docs)
> >>
> >> Anyway, let me know if I can help with anything else.
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
Ok, I accept the challenge.

If you could clarify something for me though:
  * IIRC, this release needs to be voted GA by our [committers/PMC]
    before we can announce the release as GA.
    Has that vote happened?

  * What is the status of the validator 1.1.3.  Ted's entry in the
    wiki mirrors my own suspicion.  Any clarity would help me here.
    The release doesn't appear on ibiblio, so we (commons folks)
    need to make that happen as well.

  * Do I need to close or mark 'later' all the bugs in bugzilla?

  * I've tagged cvs with STRUTS_1_2_2 (from the wiki, or should
    that have been 1_1_2?)
    Either way, I've found a few items I want to update, can I remove
    or move the tag?  Or just retag?


--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]


Run with it, James. If anyone wants to pitch in, they can. But this doesn't
have to be a one-person job. (Though there's not much to A1-A6.) Just keep
the wiki page (that Niall started) updated.

We are all "jointly and severally" responsible for Struts. Anyone can roll a
release whenever they like. The only question is whether it will earn the
Apache Struts brand through a majority vote (3 +1s, more +1s than -1s). The
release plans and checklists are just a means to that end.

-Ted.

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:55:58 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> Ok, I've finished testing the apps and all. What can I do now? Do
> you want me to take over and finish this? I though Niall or someone
> was working on it. Could be my bad memory, anyway, I'll do it if
> you guys don't mind me asking stupid 'release manager' newbie
> questions :P (and I'll keep it on-list for others who want to do
> it later). I'll even try to keep a log and throw a page on the
> wiki.
>
>
> --
> James Mitchell
> Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> EdgeTech, Inc.
> 678.910.8017
> AIM: jmitchtx
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
>
>
> No, I'm not running with the torch, I'm trying to pass the baton. :)
>
> If you (or anyone else) has run the Cactus tests since yesterday's
> code changes, please feel free to update the Wiki.
>
> * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease122
>
> Then we'd be down to play testing the bundled applications and
> Release Checklist steps A1-A6.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:59:06 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Am I to assume the recent cvs activity to be what I think it
>> means?
>>
>> I was just reading over the release instructions and was about to
>> volunteer some time, but if you're running with the torch, I'll
>> wait till next time. (besides, I would need some hand-holding for
>> the first time anyway)
>>
>> Not sure if this help you, but I've already refreshed my local
>> cvs and run the full gauntlet of tests and they all pass. I also
>> ran the distribution without problems. (this was prior to your
>> updating the docs)
>>
>> Anyway, let me know if I can help with anything else.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
Run with it, James. If anyone wants to pitch in, they can. But this doesn't have to be a one-person job. (Though there's not much to A1-A6.) Just keep the wiki page (that Niall started) updated. 

We are all "jointly and severally" responsible for Struts. Anyone can roll a release whenever they like. The only question is whether it will earn the Apache Struts brand through a majority vote (3 +1s, more +1s than -1s). The release plans and checklists are just a means to that end.

-Ted.

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:55:58 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> Ok, I've finished testing the apps and all.  What can I do now?  Do
> you want me to take over and finish this? I though Niall or someone
> was working on it.  Could be my bad memory, anyway, I'll do it if
> you guys don't mind me asking stupid 'release manager' newbie
> questions :P  (and I'll keep it on-list for others who want to do
> it later).  I'll even try to keep a log and throw a page on the
> wiki.
>
>
> --
> James Mitchell
> Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> EdgeTech, Inc.
> 678.910.8017
> AIM: jmitchtx
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
>
>
> No, I'm not running with the torch, I'm trying to pass the baton. :)
>
> If you (or anyone else) has run the Cactus tests since yesterday's
> code changes, please feel free to update the Wiki.
>
> * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease122
>
> Then we'd be down to play testing the bundled applications and
> Release Checklist steps A1-A6.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:59:06 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Am I to assume the recent cvs activity to be what I think it
>> means?
>>
>> I was just reading over the release instructions and was about to
>> volunteer some time, but if you're running with the torch, I'll
>> wait till next time. (besides, I would need some hand-holding for
>> the first time anyway)
>>
>> Not sure if this help you, but I've already refreshed my local
>> cvs and run the full gauntlet of tests and they all pass. I also
>> ran the distribution without problems. (this was prior to your
>> updating the docs)
>>
>> Anyway, let me know if I can help with anything else.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
Ok, I've finished testing the apps and all.  What can I do now?  Do you want
me to take over and finish this? I though Niall or someone was working on
it.  Could be my bad memory, anyway, I'll do it if you guys don't mind me
asking stupid 'release manager' newbie questions :P  (and I'll keep it
on-list for others who want to do it later).  I'll even try to keep a log
and throw a page on the wiki.




--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]


No, I'm not running with the torch, I'm trying to pass the baton. :)

If you (or anyone else) has run the Cactus tests since yesterday's code
changes, please feel free to update the Wiki.

* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease122

Then we'd be down to play testing the bundled applications and Release
Checklist steps A1-A6.

-Ted.

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:59:06 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> Am I to assume the recent cvs activity to be what I think it means?
>
> I was just reading over the release instructions and was about to
> volunteer some time, but if you're running with the torch, I'll
> wait till next time. (besides, I would need some hand-holding for
> the first time anyway)
>
> Not sure if this help you, but I've already refreshed my local cvs
> and run the full gauntlet of tests and they all pass. I also ran
> the distribution without problems. (this was prior to your
> updating the docs)
>
> Anyway, let me know if I can help with anything else.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by Martin Cooper <mf...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:52:22 -0400, James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
> That page says it is immutable.
> 
> " You are not allowed to edit this page. "

Did you log in? All wiki pages are immutable until you log in. I just
tried this one, and it seems OK to me.

--
Martin Cooper


> 
> --
> James Mitchell
> Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> EdgeTech, Inc.
> 678.910.8017
> AIM: jmitchtx
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
> 
> No, I'm not running with the torch, I'm trying to pass the baton. :)
> 
> If you (or anyone else) has run the Cactus tests since yesterday's code
> changes, please feel free to update the Wiki.
> 
> * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease122
> 
> Then we'd be down to play testing the bundled applications and Release
> Checklist steps A1-A6.
> 
> -Ted.
> 
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:59:06 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> > Am I to assume the recent cvs activity to be what I think it means?
> >
> > I was just reading over the release instructions and was about to
> > volunteer some time, but if you're running with the torch, I'll
> > wait till next time. (besides, I would need some hand-holding for
> > the first time anyway)
> >
> > Not sure if this help you, but I've already refreshed my local cvs
> > and run the full gauntlet of tests and they all pass. I also ran
> > the distribution without problems. (this was prior to your
> > updating the docs)
> >
> > Anyway, let me know if I can help with anything else.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
That page says it is immutable.

" You are not allowed to edit this page. "



--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]


No, I'm not running with the torch, I'm trying to pass the baton. :)

If you (or anyone else) has run the Cactus tests since yesterday's code
changes, please feel free to update the Wiki.

* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease122

Then we'd be down to play testing the bundled applications and Release
Checklist steps A1-A6.

-Ted.

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:59:06 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> Am I to assume the recent cvs activity to be what I think it means?
>
> I was just reading over the release instructions and was about to
> volunteer some time, but if you're running with the torch, I'll
> wait till next time. (besides, I would need some hand-holding for
> the first time anyway)
>
> Not sure if this help you, but I've already refreshed my local cvs
> and run the full gauntlet of tests and they all pass. I also ran
> the distribution without problems. (this was prior to your
> updating the docs)
>
> Anyway, let me know if I can help with anything else.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]

Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
No, I'm not running with the torch, I'm trying to pass the baton. :) 

If you (or anyone else) has run the Cactus tests since yesterday's code changes, please feel free to update the Wiki. 

* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease122 

Then we'd be down to play testing the bundled applications and Release Checklist steps A1-A6.

-Ted.

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:59:06 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> Am I to assume the recent cvs activity to be what I think it means?
>
> I was just reading over the release instructions and was about to
> volunteer some time, but if you're running with the torch, I'll
> wait till next time. (besides, I would need some hand-holding for
> the first time anyway)
>
> Not sure if this help you, but I've already refreshed my local cvs
> and run the full gauntlet of tests and they all pass.  I also ran
> the distribution without problems.  (this was prior to your
> updating the docs)
>
> Anyway, let me know if I can help with anything else.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
There are sufficient votes to stamp Commons Validator 1.1.3 GA, so it just needs to be documented as such and mirrored. 

The other GA issue is hooking the Acquiring page up to the mirroring system. For a beta we can use cvs.apache.org, but a GA would have to be mirrored. Martin and robert were chatting about that. 

-Ted.

On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 04:34:46 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I've been through the bugs for Struts (also applied patch for 30300
> you mention below) and theres none outstanding thats stopping a
> release.
>
> I was (and still am) hoping someone with more experience (as the
> newbie committer, thats everyone else - lol) would step in. Anyway,
> I'm hoping I might start the ball rolling by setting up a release
> plan for version 1.2.2 on the Wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease122
>
> Feel free to correct/improve it.
>
> Niall
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 11:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2
>
>
> I'll be tied up for some time yet. If anyone else can push this
> along, please do.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:02:18 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
>> Wheels on other carts started to squeak this week, and I haven't
>> tagged or rolled 1.2.2 yet.
>>
>> One thing I'd like to do first is to link our "Acquiring" page to
>> the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to
>> the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet.
>> If anyone else has a clue, please feel free to jump in.
>>
>> Otherwise, I'd like to apply
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30300
>>
>> and update the Release Notes, but, AFAIK, that's it.
>>
>> -Ted.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
I've been through the bugs for Struts (also applied patch for 30300 you
mention below) and theres none outstanding thats stopping a release.

I was (and still am) hoping someone with more experience (as the newbie
committer, thats everyone else - lol) would step in. Anyway, I'm hoping I
might start the ball rolling by setting up a release plan for version 1.2.2
on the Wiki:

http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease122

Feel free to correct/improve it.

Niall

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2


I'll be tied up for some time yet. If anyone else can push this along,
please do.

-Ted.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:02:18 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
> Wheels on other carts started to squeak this week, and I haven't
> tagged or rolled 1.2.2 yet.
>
> One thing I'd like to do first is to link our "Acquiring" page to
> the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to
> the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet. If
> anyone else has a clue, please feel free to jump in.
>
> Otherwise, I'd like to apply
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30300
>
> and update the Release Notes, but, AFAIK, that's it.
>
> -Ted.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Re: Struts 1.2.2

Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
I'll be tied up for some time yet. If anyone else can push this along, please do. 

-Ted.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:02:18 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
> Wheels on other carts started to squeak this week, and I haven't
> tagged or rolled 1.2.2 yet.
>
> One thing I'd like to do first is to link our "Acquiring" page to
> the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to
> the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet. If
> anyone else has a clue, please feel free to jump in.
>
> Otherwise, I'd like to apply
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30300
>
> and update the Release Notes, but, AFAIK, that's it.
>
> -Ted.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org