Re: svn commit: r933251 - /subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

["Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu>]

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:19 AM, <ka...@apache.org> wrote:

> Author: kameshj
> Date: Mon Apr 12 14:19:23 2010
> New Revision: 933251
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933251&view=rev
> Log:
> *STATUS: Propose r933194 for backport.
>
> Modified:
>    subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=933251&r1=933250&r2=933251&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Mon Apr 12 14:19:23 2010
> @@ -130,6 +130,12 @@ Candidate changes:
>      Fixes ruby binding tests on a couple of platforms.  Needed for
> release.
>    Votes:
>
> + * r933194
> +   Fix for issue 2753
> +   SVNListParentPath feature doesn't work when svn authz is used.
> +   Justification:
> +     This issue is waiting for resolution for more than 3 years.
>

"It's an old issue" doesn't seem like much of a justification to me.  Is
there a compelling reason to include this fix in 1.6.x?  If so, *that*
should be the justification for the backport.

-Hyrum