You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by kiran chitturi <ch...@gmail.com> on 2022/06/02 14:17:42 UTC
Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.2
Hi Mike,
I found a new issue in Solr SQL (SOLR-16227) and have a fix for it (
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/887). Can you wait on the release for
8.11.2 till I can backport this?
Thank you,
Kiran.
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 9:21 AM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote:
> Howdy folks, now that Lucene 9.2 has wrapped and we're past the holiday
> weekend in the United States, I'd like to take a look at getting this
> rolling by the end of the week. I see an open PR for
> backporting LUCENE-10236 but it doesn't look like anything else would
> really be waiting at the moment.
>
> I will plan to build a release candidate on Thursday (sooner if
> LUCENE-10236 is committed, later if somebody else shouts that they have
> other issues).
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 3:48 PM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
>> I bumped Jackson in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16213 and
>> also backported to 8_11. Wdyt?
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> 18. mai 2022 kl. 15:22 skrev Gus Heck <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> SOLR-16194 is in and ported to 8.11,.2
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 7:12 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I was pinged on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16019 because
>>> I have an in-flight PR with a backport. I'll complete and merge that PR.
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>>
>>> 13. mai 2022 kl. 01:03 skrev Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>:
>>>
>>> To: dev@lucene, dev@solr
>>>
>>> NOTICE:
>>>
>>> I am planning on preparing a bugfix release from branch branch_8_11
>>> (likely mid next week)
>>>
>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>
>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>> ** If you're backporting stuff this week still or over the weekend, then
>>> skip
>>> the bit about how long it will take.
>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.11.2
>>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>> Blocker
>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>> the current release branch.
>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.11.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>> delay
>>> a release candidate build.
>>>
>>> Also, please observe that since 9.0 already exists, there cannot be any
>>> index format breaking changes. It really should only be bug fixes that have
>>> already been verified on the 9x branch.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>
>>
>>
Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.2
Posted by David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>.
I merged SOLR-16227 to main, 9, 8.11 some minutes ago.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 1:59 PM Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
> Yes, please fix and backport SOLR-16227, it looks almost ready from the
> conversation on the PR. I will plan to do the first RC on Monday if we can
> get the backport completed today.
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:18 AM kiran chitturi <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I found a new issue in Solr SQL (SOLR-16227) and have a fix for it (
>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/887). Can you wait on the release
>> for 8.11.2 till I can backport this?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Kiran.
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 9:21 AM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Howdy folks, now that Lucene 9.2 has wrapped and we're past the holiday
>>> weekend in the United States, I'd like to take a look at getting this
>>> rolling by the end of the week. I see an open PR for
>>> backporting LUCENE-10236 but it doesn't look like anything else would
>>> really be waiting at the moment.
>>>
>>> I will plan to build a release candidate on Thursday (sooner if
>>> LUCENE-10236 is committed, later if somebody else shouts that they have
>>> other issues).
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 3:48 PM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I bumped Jackson in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16213 and
>>>> also backported to 8_11. Wdyt?
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>> 18. mai 2022 kl. 15:22 skrev Gus Heck <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> SOLR-16194 is in and ported to 8.11,.2
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 7:12 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I was pinged on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16019 because
>>>>> I have an in-flight PR with a backport. I'll complete and merge that PR.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 13. mai 2022 kl. 01:03 skrev Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> To: dev@lucene, dev@solr
>>>>>
>>>>> NOTICE:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am planning on preparing a bugfix release from branch branch_8_11
>>>>> (likely mid next week)
>>>>>
>>>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>>>> ** If you're backporting stuff this week still or over the weekend,
>>>>> then skip
>>>>> the bit about how long it will take.
>>>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.11.2
>>>>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>>>> Blocker
>>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
>>>>> committed
>>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>>>> the current release branch.
>>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.11.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>>>> delay
>>>>> a release candidate build.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, please observe that since 9.0 already exists, there cannot be
>>>>> any index format breaking changes. It really should only be bug fixes that
>>>>> have already been verified on the 9x branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.2
Posted by David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>.
I merged SOLR-16227 to main, 9, 8.11 some minutes ago.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 1:59 PM Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
> Yes, please fix and backport SOLR-16227, it looks almost ready from the
> conversation on the PR. I will plan to do the first RC on Monday if we can
> get the backport completed today.
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:18 AM kiran chitturi <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I found a new issue in Solr SQL (SOLR-16227) and have a fix for it (
>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/887). Can you wait on the release
>> for 8.11.2 till I can backport this?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Kiran.
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 9:21 AM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Howdy folks, now that Lucene 9.2 has wrapped and we're past the holiday
>>> weekend in the United States, I'd like to take a look at getting this
>>> rolling by the end of the week. I see an open PR for
>>> backporting LUCENE-10236 but it doesn't look like anything else would
>>> really be waiting at the moment.
>>>
>>> I will plan to build a release candidate on Thursday (sooner if
>>> LUCENE-10236 is committed, later if somebody else shouts that they have
>>> other issues).
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 3:48 PM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I bumped Jackson in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16213 and
>>>> also backported to 8_11. Wdyt?
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>> 18. mai 2022 kl. 15:22 skrev Gus Heck <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> SOLR-16194 is in and ported to 8.11,.2
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 7:12 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I was pinged on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16019 because
>>>>> I have an in-flight PR with a backport. I'll complete and merge that PR.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 13. mai 2022 kl. 01:03 skrev Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> To: dev@lucene, dev@solr
>>>>>
>>>>> NOTICE:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am planning on preparing a bugfix release from branch branch_8_11
>>>>> (likely mid next week)
>>>>>
>>>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>>>> ** If you're backporting stuff this week still or over the weekend,
>>>>> then skip
>>>>> the bit about how long it will take.
>>>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.11.2
>>>>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>>>> Blocker
>>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
>>>>> committed
>>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>>>> the current release branch.
>>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.11.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>>>> delay
>>>>> a release candidate build.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, please observe that since 9.0 already exists, there cannot be
>>>>> any index format breaking changes. It really should only be bug fixes that
>>>>> have already been verified on the 9x branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.2
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>.
Yes, please fix and backport SOLR-16227, it looks almost ready from the
conversation on the PR. I will plan to do the first RC on Monday if we can
get the backport completed today.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:18 AM kiran chitturi <ch...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I found a new issue in Solr SQL (SOLR-16227) and have a fix for it (
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/887). Can you wait on the release for
> 8.11.2 till I can backport this?
>
> Thank you,
> Kiran.
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 9:21 AM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Howdy folks, now that Lucene 9.2 has wrapped and we're past the holiday
>> weekend in the United States, I'd like to take a look at getting this
>> rolling by the end of the week. I see an open PR for
>> backporting LUCENE-10236 but it doesn't look like anything else would
>> really be waiting at the moment.
>>
>> I will plan to build a release candidate on Thursday (sooner if
>> LUCENE-10236 is committed, later if somebody else shouts that they have
>> other issues).
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 3:48 PM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I bumped Jackson in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16213 and
>>> also backported to 8_11. Wdyt?
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> 18. mai 2022 kl. 15:22 skrev Gus Heck <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> SOLR-16194 is in and ported to 8.11,.2
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 7:12 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was pinged on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16019 because
>>>> I have an in-flight PR with a backport. I'll complete and merge that PR.
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 13. mai 2022 kl. 01:03 skrev Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>:
>>>>
>>>> To: dev@lucene, dev@solr
>>>>
>>>> NOTICE:
>>>>
>>>> I am planning on preparing a bugfix release from branch branch_8_11
>>>> (likely mid next week)
>>>>
>>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>>
>>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>>> ** If you're backporting stuff this week still or over the weekend,
>>>> then skip
>>>> the bit about how long it will take.
>>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.11.2
>>>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>>> Blocker
>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>>> the current release branch.
>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.11.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>>> delay
>>>> a release candidate build.
>>>>
>>>> Also, please observe that since 9.0 already exists, there cannot be any
>>>> index format breaking changes. It really should only be bug fixes that have
>>>> already been verified on the 9x branch.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.2
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>.
Yes, please fix and backport SOLR-16227, it looks almost ready from the
conversation on the PR. I will plan to do the first RC on Monday if we can
get the backport completed today.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:18 AM kiran chitturi <ch...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I found a new issue in Solr SQL (SOLR-16227) and have a fix for it (
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/887). Can you wait on the release for
> 8.11.2 till I can backport this?
>
> Thank you,
> Kiran.
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 9:21 AM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Howdy folks, now that Lucene 9.2 has wrapped and we're past the holiday
>> weekend in the United States, I'd like to take a look at getting this
>> rolling by the end of the week. I see an open PR for
>> backporting LUCENE-10236 but it doesn't look like anything else would
>> really be waiting at the moment.
>>
>> I will plan to build a release candidate on Thursday (sooner if
>> LUCENE-10236 is committed, later if somebody else shouts that they have
>> other issues).
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 3:48 PM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I bumped Jackson in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16213 and
>>> also backported to 8_11. Wdyt?
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> 18. mai 2022 kl. 15:22 skrev Gus Heck <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> SOLR-16194 is in and ported to 8.11,.2
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 7:12 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was pinged on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16019 because
>>>> I have an in-flight PR with a backport. I'll complete and merge that PR.
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 13. mai 2022 kl. 01:03 skrev Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>:
>>>>
>>>> To: dev@lucene, dev@solr
>>>>
>>>> NOTICE:
>>>>
>>>> I am planning on preparing a bugfix release from branch branch_8_11
>>>> (likely mid next week)
>>>>
>>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>>
>>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>>> ** If you're backporting stuff this week still or over the weekend,
>>>> then skip
>>>> the bit about how long it will take.
>>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.11.2
>>>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>>> Blocker
>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>>> the current release branch.
>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.11.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>>> delay
>>>> a release candidate build.
>>>>
>>>> Also, please observe that since 9.0 already exists, there cannot be any
>>>> index format breaking changes. It really should only be bug fixes that have
>>>> already been verified on the 9x branch.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>
>>>
>>>