You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by "Gautier DI FOLCO (Jira)" <se...@james.apache.org> on 2019/10/04 08:15:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (JAMES-2900) Use UnicastProcessor instead of WorkQueueProcessor

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gautier DI FOLCO resolved JAMES-2900.
-------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> Use UnicastProcessor instead of WorkQueueProcessor
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JAMES-2900
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2900
>             Project: James Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Gautier DI FOLCO
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> Since Reactor 3.3.0 (see JAMES-2899), WorkQueueProcessor have been moved out of reactor-core.
> It'll be better to avoid an extra dependency.
> Additionally we used it to represents "many producers, one consumer" which is the role of UnicastProcessor.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org