You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@roller.apache.org by David M Johnson <Da...@Sun.COM> on 2005/08/02 14:46:46 UTC
Roller 2.0 landing
Roller 2.0 is almost ready for the trunk.
Once it's ready and I have merged all 1.X changes from trunk to the
roller_2.0 branch, I'd like to do something like this:
cd <roller-svn-dir>
svn mv trunk branches/roller_1.3
svn mv branches/roller_2.0 trunk
In other words, the roller_2.0 branch becomes the trunk.
Any comments or concerns about this?
- Dave
Re: Roller 2.0 landing
Posted by Allen Gilliland <Al...@Sun.COM>.
well ... i doubt 2.0 will be *easily* backward compatible with any previous versions, but if you are worried about the stability of your site then you probably don't want to be working off the trunk anyways. I doubt there will be any problems if you wait until releases are final before upgrading.
-- Allen
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:42, Matt Raible wrote:
> As long as it's *easily* backwards compatible with the version I have
> running on my site (1.2) - I'm +1. ;-)
>
> Matt
>
> On 8/2/05, Allen Gilliland <Al...@sun.com> wrote:
> > +1. Now seems like the perfect time for this.
> >
> > -- Allen
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 07:15, Anil Gangolli wrote:
> > > +1. I think that's the right approach.
> > >
> > > David M Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > > Roller 2.0 is almost ready for the trunk.
> > > >
> > > > Once it's ready and I have merged all 1.X changes from trunk to the
> > > > roller_2.0 branch, I'd like to do something like this:
> > > >
> > > > cd <roller-svn-dir>
> > > > svn mv trunk branches/roller_1.3
> > > > svn mv branches/roller_2.0 trunk
> > > >
> > > > In other words, the roller_2.0 branch becomes the trunk.
> > > >
> > > > Any comments or concerns about this?
> > > >
> > > > - Dave
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
Re: Roller 2.0 landing
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
As long as it's *easily* backwards compatible with the version I have
running on my site (1.2) - I'm +1. ;-)
Matt
On 8/2/05, Allen Gilliland <Al...@sun.com> wrote:
> +1. Now seems like the perfect time for this.
>
> -- Allen
>
>
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 07:15, Anil Gangolli wrote:
> > +1. I think that's the right approach.
> >
> > David M Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > Roller 2.0 is almost ready for the trunk.
> > >
> > > Once it's ready and I have merged all 1.X changes from trunk to the
> > > roller_2.0 branch, I'd like to do something like this:
> > >
> > > cd <roller-svn-dir>
> > > svn mv trunk branches/roller_1.3
> > > svn mv branches/roller_2.0 trunk
> > >
> > > In other words, the roller_2.0 branch becomes the trunk.
> > >
> > > Any comments or concerns about this?
> > >
> > > - Dave
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: Roller 2.0 landing
Posted by Allen Gilliland <Al...@Sun.COM>.
+1. Now seems like the perfect time for this.
-- Allen
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 07:15, Anil Gangolli wrote:
> +1. I think that's the right approach.
>
> David M Johnson wrote:
>
> > Roller 2.0 is almost ready for the trunk.
> >
> > Once it's ready and I have merged all 1.X changes from trunk to the
> > roller_2.0 branch, I'd like to do something like this:
> >
> > cd <roller-svn-dir>
> > svn mv trunk branches/roller_1.3
> > svn mv branches/roller_2.0 trunk
> >
> > In other words, the roller_2.0 branch becomes the trunk.
> >
> > Any comments or concerns about this?
> >
> > - Dave
> >
> >
>
Re: Roller 2.0 landing
Posted by Anil Gangolli <an...@busybuddha.org>.
+1. I think that's the right approach.
David M Johnson wrote:
> Roller 2.0 is almost ready for the trunk.
>
> Once it's ready and I have merged all 1.X changes from trunk to the
> roller_2.0 branch, I'd like to do something like this:
>
> cd <roller-svn-dir>
> svn mv trunk branches/roller_1.3
> svn mv branches/roller_2.0 trunk
>
> In other words, the roller_2.0 branch becomes the trunk.
>
> Any comments or concerns about this?
>
> - Dave
>
>