You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/08/06 13:48:11 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22172] New: - [lang] DateUtils.parseCVS behavior parsing "h:mm z"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22172>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22172

[lang] DateUtils.parseCVS behavior parsing "h:mm z"

           Summary: [lang] DateUtils.parseCVS behavior parsing "h:mm z"
           Product: Commons
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Lang
        AssignedTo: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: stevencaswell@apache.org


When DateUtils.parseCVS parses a time in "h:mm z" format, the resulting date is
1/1/1970. Is this appropriate, or would it be more appropriate for the resulting
date to be the current system date?

I don't know what the CVS behavior is.