You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> on 2014/06/09 17:20:25 UTC
Board Report
Please review/comment:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
My biggest question was about the Git migration.
Thanks,
mrg
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
I'm down with a GD, too.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
wrote:
> FWIW, we can even use GoogleDocs and destroy them after report submission
> :)
>
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah :-/
> >
> > ~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m
> "board reports"
> > svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden (
> http://svn.apache.org)
> >
> > I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable -
> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
> >
> > I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for
> reports. Maybe we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place
> something there that is not a board report in the future.
> >
> > For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and
> this list.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Well, according to our website:
> >>
> >> "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only
> >> mode"
> >>
> >> And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received:
> >>
> >> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> >> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
> >> MKACTIVITY request for
> >> '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635'
> >>
> >>
> >> So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only?
> >>
> >> mrg
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mike,
> >>>
> >>> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the
> >>> top-level of SVN, not Git.
> >>>
> >>> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN
> >>> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site
> >>> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So
> >>> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main”
> folder
> >>> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ .
> >>>
> >>> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN.
> >>>
> >>> What do you think?
> >>>
> >>> Andrus
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review
> >>> it. It
> >>>> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
> >>>>
> >>>> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
> >>>> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
> >>>> objects.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> mrg
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <
> mgentry@masslight.net>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >>> andrus@objectstyle.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I’d say go for it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
> >>>>>> reports? If
> >>>>>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> mrg
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >>>>>> andrus@objectstyle.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not
> >>> sure
> >>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>> do. But I won’t object to it either.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Andrus
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <
> ari@maniatis.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some
> sense.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ari
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s
> plan
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
> >>>>>> repo for
> >>>>>>>> it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Andrus
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <
> mgentry@masslight.net
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
> >>>>>> board
> >>>>>>>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks
> >>> pretty
> >>>>>>>> awful.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> mrg
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >>>>>>>> andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and
> >>> will
> >>>>>>>> submit the report in a few minutes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and
> check
> >>>>>>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and
> >>> there’s
> >>>>>>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <
> mgentry@masslight.net
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review/comment:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> mrg
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
> >>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
> >>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49
> 102A
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
FWIW, we can even use GoogleDocs and destroy them after report submission :)
On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Yeah :-/
>
> ~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m "board reports"
> svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden (http://svn.apache.org)
>
> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable - that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>
> I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for reports. Maybe we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place something there that is not a board report in the future.
>
> For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and this list.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
>> Well, according to our website:
>>
>> "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only
>> mode"
>>
>> And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received:
>>
>> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
>> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
>> MKACTIVITY request for
>> '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635'
>>
>>
>> So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only?
>>
>> mrg
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the
>>> top-level of SVN, not Git.
>>>
>>> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN
>>> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site
>>> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So
>>> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” folder
>>> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ .
>>>
>>> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review
>>> it. It
>>>> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
>>>>
>>>> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
>>>> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
>>>> objects.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> mrg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>>> andrus@objectstyle.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’d say go for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
>>>>>> reports? If
>>>>>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>>>>>> andrus@objectstyle.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not
>>> sure
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> do. But I won’t object to it either.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan
>>> to
>>>>>>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
>>>>>> repo for
>>>>>>>> it?)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net
>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
>>>>>> board
>>>>>>>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks
>>> pretty
>>>>>>>> awful.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
>>>>>>>> andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and
>>> will
>>>>>>>> submit the report in a few minutes.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
>>>>>>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and
>>> there’s
>>>>>>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net
>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review/comment:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
I was going to email it to the board tonight.
On Sep 11, 2014, at 5:13 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> Any other changes? We really need to get this out.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Here is my revision:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/andrus/5419f195af37f4cf20a1/revisions
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>
>>> https://gist.github.com/mrg/fcf9b661bc88f9c9c94a
>>>
>>> Leave comments if you care. Or reply here, etc.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> mrg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gist is pretty great. I'll create them there. Good idea.
>>>>
>>>> mrg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>> andrus@objectstyle.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist -
>>>>> https://gist.github.com/ :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> I'm not beholden to a specific location. I just know we need to get
>> the
>>>>>> report out soon. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org
>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is
>>>>> writable -
>>>>>>> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed
>> other
>>>>>>> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all,
>> and
>>>>> we
>>>>>>> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one
>>>>> will
>>>>>>> actually find them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Any other changes? We really need to get this out.
Thanks,
mrg
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
wrote:
> Here is my revision:
>
> https://gist.github.com/andrus/5419f195af37f4cf20a1/revisions
>
> On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
> > https://gist.github.com/mrg/fcf9b661bc88f9c9c94a
> >
> > Leave comments if you care. Or reply here, etc.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > mrg
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Gist is pretty great. I'll create them there. Good idea.
> >>
> >> mrg
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> andrus@objectstyle.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist -
> >>> https://gist.github.com/ :)
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> wrote:
> >>>> I'm not beholden to a specific location. I just know we need to get
> the
> >>>> report out soon. :-)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >>>>>> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is
> >>> writable -
> >>>>> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed
> other
> >>>>> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all,
> and
> >>> we
> >>>>> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one
> >>> will
> >>>>> actually find them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ari
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> -------------------------->
> >>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
> >>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Here is my revision:
https://gist.github.com/andrus/5419f195af37f4cf20a1/revisions
On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> https://gist.github.com/mrg/fcf9b661bc88f9c9c94a
>
> Leave comments if you care. Or reply here, etc.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Gist is pretty great. I'll create them there. Good idea.
>>
>> mrg
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist -
>>> https://gist.github.com/ :)
>>>
>>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>>> I'm not beholden to a specific location. I just know we need to get the
>>>> report out soon. :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is
>>> writable -
>>>>> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
>>>>> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and
>>> we
>>>>> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one
>>> will
>>>>> actually find them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ari
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
https://gist.github.com/mrg/fcf9b661bc88f9c9c94a
Leave comments if you care. Or reply here, etc.
Thanks,
mrg
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
wrote:
> Gist is pretty great. I'll create them there. Good idea.
>
> mrg
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist -
>> https://gist.github.com/ :)
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>> > I'm not beholden to a specific location. I just know we need to get the
>> > report out soon. :-)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> >>> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is
>> writable -
>> >> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
>> >> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>> >>
>> >> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and
>> we
>> >> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one
>> will
>> >> actually find them.
>> >>
>> >> Ari
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -------------------------->
>> >> Aristedes Maniatis
>> >> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>> >>
>>
>>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Gist is pretty great. I'll create them there. Good idea.
mrg
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
wrote:
> I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist -
> https://gist.github.com/ :)
>
> On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> > I'm not beholden to a specific location. I just know we need to get the
> > report out soon. :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >>> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable
> -
> >> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
> >> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
> >>
> >> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and
> we
> >> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one
> will
> >> actually find them.
> >>
> >> Ari
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -------------------------->
> >> Aristedes Maniatis
> >> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >>
>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist - https://gist.github.com/ :)
On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> I'm not beholden to a specific location. I just know we need to get the
> report out soon. :-)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable -
>> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
>> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>>
>> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and we
>> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one will
>> actually find them.
>>
>> Ari
>>
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
I'm not beholden to a specific location. I just know we need to get the
report out soon. :-)
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
wrote:
> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> > I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable -
> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>
> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and we
> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one will
> actually find them.
>
> Ari
>
>
> --
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable - that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and we don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one will actually find them.
Ari
--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Well, here is the current draft (which is also available in Git until I can
delete it) in Markdown format:
# Apache Cayenne Board Report - September 2014
Apache Cayenne is a Java persistence framework. It takes a distinct
approach to object persistence and provides an ORM runtime, remote
persistence services, and a GUI mapping/modeling tool.
## Project Status
* Preparations are underway for Cayenne 3.1 Final (Release Candidate 1 was
released on Feb 18).
* New feature development continues for Cayenne 3.2.
* Git migration has completed (for 3.2 only, previous revisions remain in
Subversion). As a result of the migration, we have received pull requests
via GitHub which opens up new avenues for developers to contribute.
* Confluence "CAY" space deleted since it was not used.
## Community
* Mailing list activity is about average on developer and user lists.
* The last PMC member was added in December 2012.
* The last committer was added in May 2012.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
wrote:
> Yeah :-/
>
> ~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m
> "board reports"
> svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden (
> http://svn.apache.org)
>
> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable -
> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>
> I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for reports.
> Maybe we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place something
> there that is not a board report in the future.
>
> For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and
> this list.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
> > Well, according to our website:
> >
> > "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only
> > mode"
> >
> > And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received:
> >
> > svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> > svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
> > MKACTIVITY request for
> > '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635'
> >
> >
> > So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only?
> >
> > mrg
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Mike,
> >>
> >> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the
> >> top-level of SVN, not Git.
> >>
> >> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN
> >> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site
> >> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So
> >> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main”
> folder
> >> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ .
> >>
> >> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review
> >> it. It
> >>> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
> >>>
> >>> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
> >>> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
> >>> objects.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> mrg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >> andrus@objectstyle.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I’d say go for it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
> >>>>> reports? If
> >>>>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> mrg
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >>>>> andrus@objectstyle.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not
> >> sure
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>> do. But I won’t object to it either.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Andrus
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ari
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan
> >> to
> >>>>>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
> >>>>> repo for
> >>>>>>> it?)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Andrus
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <
> mgentry@masslight.net
> >>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
> >>>>> board
> >>>>>>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks
> >> pretty
> >>>>>>> awful.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> mrg
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >>>>>>> andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and
> >> will
> >>>>>>> submit the report in a few minutes.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and
> check
> >>>>>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and
> >> there’s
> >>>>>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <
> mgentry@masslight.net
> >>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please review/comment:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> mrg
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> -------------------------->
> >>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
> >>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Yeah :-/
~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m "board reports"
svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden (http://svn.apache.org)
I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable - that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for reports. Maybe we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place something there that is not a board report in the future.
For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and this list.
Andrus
On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> Well, according to our website:
>
> "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only
> mode"
>
> And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received:
>
> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
> MKACTIVITY request for
> '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635'
>
>
> So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only?
>
> mrg
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Mike,
>>
>> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the
>> top-level of SVN, not Git.
>>
>> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN
>> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site
>> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So
>> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” folder
>> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ .
>>
>> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review
>> it. It
>>> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
>>>
>>> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
>>> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
>>> objects.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> mrg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>> andrus@objectstyle.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>>>>>
>>>>> I’d say go for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
>>>>> reports? If
>>>>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>>>>> andrus@objectstyle.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not
>> sure
>>>>> we
>>>>>>> do. But I won’t object to it either.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan
>> to
>>>>>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
>>>>> repo for
>>>>>>> it?)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net
>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
>>>>> board
>>>>>>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks
>> pretty
>>>>>>> awful.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
>>>>>>> andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and
>> will
>>>>>>> submit the report in a few minutes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
>>>>>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and
>> there’s
>>>>>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net
>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please review/comment:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Well, according to our website:
"For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only
mode"
And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received:
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
MKACTIVITY request for
'/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635'
So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only?
mrg
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the
> top-level of SVN, not Git.
>
> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN
> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site
> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So
> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” folder
> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ .
>
> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Andrus
>
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
> > Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review
> it. It
> > is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
> >
> > I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
> > going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
> > objects.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > mrg
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> andrus@objectstyle.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >>>
> >>> I’d say go for it.
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
> >>> reports? If
> >>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> mrg
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >>> andrus@objectstyle.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not
> sure
> >>> we
> >>>>> do. But I won’t object to it either.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Andrus
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ari
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >>>>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan
> to
> >>>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
> >>> repo for
> >>>>> it?)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Andrus
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
> >>> board
> >>>>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks
> pretty
> >>>>> awful.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> mrg
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >>>>> andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and
> will
> >>>>> submit the report in a few minutes.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
> >>>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and
> there’s
> >>>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Please review/comment:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> mrg
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> -------------------------->
> >>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
> >>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Mike,
Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the top-level of SVN, not Git.
With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” folder under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ .
My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN.
What do you think?
Andrus
On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review it. It
> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
>
> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
> objects.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> wrote:
>
>> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>>>
>>> I’d say go for it.
>>>
>>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
>>> reports? If
>>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> mrg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>>> andrus@objectstyle.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure
>>> we
>>>>> do. But I won’t object to it either.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to
>>>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
>>> repo for
>>>>> it?)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
>>> board
>>>>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
>>>>> awful.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
>>>>> andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
>>>>> submit the report in a few minutes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
>>>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s
>>>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please review/comment:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review it. It
is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
objects.
Thanks,
mrg
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
wrote:
> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
>
>> > how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>>
>> I’d say go for it.
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
>> reports? If
>> > not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > mrg
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>> andrus@objectstyle.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure
>> we
>> >> do. But I won’t object to it either.
>> >>
>> >> Andrus
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ari
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> >>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to
>> >> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
>> repo for
>> >> it?)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Andrus
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
>> board
>> >> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
>> >> awful.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> mrg
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
>> >> andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> >>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
>> >> submit the report in a few minutes.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
>> >> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s
>> >> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Please review/comment:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> mrg
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> -------------------------->
>> >>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> >>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks!
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
wrote:
> > how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>
> I’d say go for it.
>
> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
> > Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board reports?
> If
> > not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > mrg
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure
> we
> >> do. But I won’t object to it either.
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
> >>>
> >>> Ari
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to
> >> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo
> for
> >> it?)
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrus
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board
> >> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
> >> awful.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> mrg
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >> andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> >>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
> >> submit the report in a few minutes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
> >> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s
> >> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Please review/comment:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> mrg
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -------------------------->
> >>> Aristedes Maniatis
> >>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
> how about "board-reports" at the top level?
I’d say go for it.
On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board reports? If
> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
>
>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure we
>> do. But I won’t object to it either.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
>>>
>>> Ari
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to
>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for
>> it?)
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board
>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
>> awful.
>>>>>
>>>>> mrg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
>> andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
>> submit the report in a few minutes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s
>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review/comment:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -------------------------->
>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board reports? If
not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
Thanks,
mrg
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
wrote:
> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure we
> do. But I won’t object to it either.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>
> > Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
> >
> > Ari
> >
> >
> > On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to
> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for
> it?)
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board
> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
> awful.
> >>>
> >>> mrg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> >>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
> submit the report in a few minutes.
> >>>
> >>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s
> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Please review/comment:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> >>>>
> >>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> mrg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > -------------------------->
> > Aristedes Maniatis
> > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >
>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure we do. But I won’t object to it either.
Andrus
On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
>
> Ari
>
>
> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for it?)
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful.
>>>
>>> mrg
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit the report in a few minutes.
>>>
>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please review/comment:
>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>>>>
>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> mrg
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
Ari
On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for it?)
>
> Andrus
>
> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful.
>>
>> mrg
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit the report in a few minutes.
>>
>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Please review/comment:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>>>
>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> mrg
>>
>>
>
--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: Board Report
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for it?)
Andrus
On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful.
>
> mrg
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit the report in a few minutes.
>
> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
>> Please review/comment:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>>
>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> mrg
>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board
report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
awful.
mrg
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
wrote:
> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
> submit the report in a few minutes.
>
> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports
> to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no
> reason to work on fixing it.
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
> Please review/comment:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>
> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
>
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
I agree. Is there any content in the wiki we care about copying over? I can't say I've logged into it for about 4 years.
Ari
On 13/06/2014 3:07am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit the report in a few minutes.
>
> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no reason to work on fixing it.
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net <ma...@masslight.net>> wrote:
>
>> Please review/comment:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>>
>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> mrg
>
--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: Board Report
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit the report in a few minutes.
Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no reason to work on fixing it.
Andrus
On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> Please review/comment:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>
> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
Re: Board Report
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
That's what I thought, but wasn't certain. I checked out the 3.2 code via
Git, but couldn't build it and thought maybe it wasn't quite ready yet.
Thanks,
mrg
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>
wrote:
> Yes, the git migration is completely done now.
>
> Ari
>
> On 10/06/2014 1:20am, Michael Gentry wrote:
> > Please review/comment:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> >
> > My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > mrg
> >
>
> --
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
Re: Board Report
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
Yes, the git migration is completely done now.
Ari
On 10/06/2014 1:20am, Michael Gentry wrote:
> Please review/comment:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>
> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A