[jira] Commented: (TAP5-743) It is too much work to hide all T5 pages inside a virtual folder, for use in mixed-implementation deployments

["Inge Solvoll (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850558#action_12850558 ] 

Inge Solvoll commented on TAP5-743:
-----------------------------------

I would be extremely interested in finding out if this can be done with url rewriting...

> It is too much work to hide all T5 pages inside a virtual folder, for use in mixed-implementation deployments
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-743
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-743
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: tapestry-core
>    Affects Versions: 5.1.0.5
>            Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
>
> In a mixed-implementation deployment (mixing Tapestry 5 with Tapestry 4 or some other framework), it would be nice if the T5 apps could be "hidden" in a virtual /t5 folder.
> This is doable, but awkward and ugly, today.
> Ideally, this would be a matter of changing the web.xml mapping to:
> <url-filter>/t5/*</url-filter>
> and making some form of configuration change, i.e.,
> configuration.add(ConfigurationConstants.TAPESTRY_APP_FOLDER, "t5");
> This would affect link generation, prefixing urls with "t5/" (including the virtual /assets folder, which would be /t5/assets). Since the /t5 portion is part of the URL mapping, it would not be part of the request pathInfo, so existing dispatch code would not need to change.  
> Of course, Websphere has some bugs in this area that might cause some grief.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.