You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@activemq.apache.org by "clebert suconic (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/12/05 19:39:58 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-870)
DestinationObjectFactoryTest/testReference: AssertionError: Thread leaked
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15723141#comment-15723141 ]
clebert suconic commented on ARTEMIS-870:
-----------------------------------------
What environment?
The test doesn't create any schedules.
The test also throws a log showing what thread leaked. it would help if you added more information.
> DestinationObjectFactoryTest/testReference: AssertionError: Thread leaked
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-870
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-870
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0
> Reporter: Jiri Danek
> Priority: Trivial
> Labels: tests
>
> The following happened to me once out of multiple runs of JMS tests:
> {noformat}
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.unit.jms.referenceable.DestinationObjectFactoryTest/testReference: FAIL #tests:1 #fails:1 #warns:0 #errors:0 #skips:0 desc.:java.lang.AssertionError: Thread leaked
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> 17:12:01 at org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.util.ActiveMQTestBase.tearDown(ActiveMQTestBase.java:336)
> 17:12:01 at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor5.invoke(Unknown Source)
> 17:12:01 at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:55)
> 17:12:01 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:507)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:33)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:48)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:48)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> 17:12:01 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> 17:12:01 at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
> 17:12:01 at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
> 17:12:01 at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
> 17:12:01 at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
> 17:12:01 at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203)
> 17:12:01 at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155)
> 17:12:01 at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)