You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com> on 2016/01/26 02:23:52 UTC

Sqoop 1.4.7 release and getting all the patches in review

There are quite a few contributions targeted to 1.4.7.   And it has been a few months since we release 1.4.6.   So,  I am proposing that we have a hack day dedicated to Sqoop 1.x

Thoughts?

Venkat

Re: Sqoop 1.4.7 release and getting all the patches in review

Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
I’ve tried to commit SQOOP-1493, but it no longer applies cleanly. I’ll work with Abe E. to see if we can get it committed soon.

We did the community release model for the last few years, so that I don’t see a problem with doing it again :) Thanks for volunteering Sowmaya!

Jarcec

> On Jan 26, 2016, at 2:14 PM, Sowmya Ramesh <sr...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> 
> I volunteer if somebody can guide me through the release process.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> On 1/26/16, 2:13 PM, "Venkat Ranganathan" <vranganathan@hortonworks.com on
> behalf of venkatrangan@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Sounds good.   Let us do the commit of Sqoop-1493.   There is also quite
>> a few functionality updates (phoenix, hive-merge etc).   I am doing these
>> review by this Friday.
>> 
>> And I heard couple of folks interested in doing the release management of
>> this.  Hopefully  we can do the community RM model  again.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Venkat
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 1/26/16, 7:36 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <jarcec@gmail.com on behalf of
>> jarcec@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> You read my mind Venkat. Just yesterday I¹ve started going through the
>>> review queue as there is quite large number of pending reviews (~25).
>>> Any reviews will be greatly appreciated!
>>> 
>>> Looking through the review queue, it seems that SQOOP-1493 is done and
>>> waiting on upstream Avro 1.8.0 release. We have few other patches that
>>> are waiting on committing this one (for example SQOOP-2666). Hence I¹m
>>> wondering if there is any concern with me committing SQOOP-1493 and
>>> unblocking progress on the subsequent patches? Avro 1.8.0 is not
>>> released yet, so it would use the snapshot dependency for now and I
>>> would create blocker to upgrade the version to final 1.8.0 when it will
>>> be available.
>>> 
>>> Jarcec
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 25, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Venkat Ranganathan
>>>> <vr...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> There are quite a few contributions targeted to 1.4.7.   And it has
>>>> been a few months since we release 1.4.6.   So,  I am proposing that we
>>>> have a hack day dedicated to Sqoop 1.x
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> 
>>>> Venkat


Re: Sqoop 1.4.7 release and getting all the patches in review

Posted by Sowmya Ramesh <sr...@hortonworks.com>.
I volunteer if somebody can guide me through the release process.

Thanks!

On 1/26/16, 2:13 PM, "Venkat Ranganathan" <vranganathan@hortonworks.com on
behalf of venkatrangan@apache.org> wrote:

>Sounds good.   Let us do the commit of Sqoop-1493.   There is also quite
>a few functionality updates (phoenix, hive-merge etc).   I am doing these
> review by this Friday.
>
>And I heard couple of folks interested in doing the release management of
>this.  Hopefully  we can do the community RM model  again.
>
>Thanks
>
>Venkat
>
>
>
>
>On 1/26/16, 7:36 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <jarcec@gmail.com on behalf of
>jarcec@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>You read my mind Venkat. Just yesterday I¹ve started going through the
>>review queue as there is quite large number of pending reviews (~25).
>>Any reviews will be greatly appreciated!
>>
>>Looking through the review queue, it seems that SQOOP-1493 is done and
>>waiting on upstream Avro 1.8.0 release. We have few other patches that
>>are waiting on committing this one (for example SQOOP-2666). Hence I¹m
>>wondering if there is any concern with me committing SQOOP-1493 and
>>unblocking progress on the subsequent patches? Avro 1.8.0 is not
>>released yet, so it would use the snapshot dependency for now and I
>>would create blocker to upgrade the version to final 1.8.0 when it will
>>be available.
>>
>>Jarcec
>>
>>> On Jan 25, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Venkat Ranganathan
>>><vr...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> There are quite a few contributions targeted to 1.4.7.   And it has
>>>been a few months since we release 1.4.6.   So,  I am proposing that we
>>>have a hack day dedicated to Sqoop 1.x
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> Venkat
>>
>>
>
>


Re: Sqoop 1.4.7 release and getting all the patches in review

Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <ve...@apache.org>.
Sounds good.   Let us do the commit of Sqoop-1493.   There is also quite a few functionality updates (phoenix, hive-merge etc).   I am doing these  review by this Friday.

And I heard couple of folks interested in doing the release management of this.  Hopefully  we can do the community RM model  again.

Thanks

Venkat




On 1/26/16, 7:36 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <jarcec@gmail.com on behalf of jarcec@apache.org> wrote:

>You read my mind Venkat. Just yesterday I’ve started going through the review queue as there is quite large number of pending reviews (~25). Any reviews will be greatly appreciated!
>
>Looking through the review queue, it seems that SQOOP-1493 is done and waiting on upstream Avro 1.8.0 release. We have few other patches that are waiting on committing this one (for example SQOOP-2666). Hence I’m wondering if there is any concern with me committing SQOOP-1493 and unblocking progress on the subsequent patches? Avro 1.8.0 is not released yet, so it would use the snapshot dependency for now and I would create blocker to upgrade the version to final 1.8.0 when it will be available.
>
>Jarcec
>
>> On Jan 25, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> 
>> There are quite a few contributions targeted to 1.4.7.   And it has been a few months since we release 1.4.6.   So,  I am proposing that we have a hack day dedicated to Sqoop 1.x
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> Venkat
>
>


Re: Sqoop 1.4.7 release and getting all the patches in review

Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
You read my mind Venkat. Just yesterday I’ve started going through the review queue as there is quite large number of pending reviews (~25). Any reviews will be greatly appreciated!

Looking through the review queue, it seems that SQOOP-1493 is done and waiting on upstream Avro 1.8.0 release. We have few other patches that are waiting on committing this one (for example SQOOP-2666). Hence I’m wondering if there is any concern with me committing SQOOP-1493 and unblocking progress on the subsequent patches? Avro 1.8.0 is not released yet, so it would use the snapshot dependency for now and I would create blocker to upgrade the version to final 1.8.0 when it will be available.

Jarcec

> On Jan 25, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> 
> There are quite a few contributions targeted to 1.4.7.   And it has been a few months since we release 1.4.6.   So,  I am proposing that we have a hack day dedicated to Sqoop 1.x
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Venkat