You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@storm.apache.org by "Rick Kellogg (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/10/05 03:44:26 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-497) b.s.m.netty.Server.getMessageQueueId is not thread safe, and can return null

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Rick Kellogg updated STORM-497:
-------------------------------
    Component/s: storm-core

> b.s.m.netty.Server.getMessageQueueId is not thread safe, and can return null
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-497
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-497
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: storm-core
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.3
>            Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.9.3-rc2
>
>
> b.s.m.netty.Server.getMessageQueueId
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-storm/blob/c5c3571ca15ee2dd675fb3cac44bd0f926ccfc67/storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/messaging/netty/Server.java#L132-150
> If there is contention when updating taskToQueueId subsequent threads through the synchronized block do not set queueId and the function returns null.
> Also reading from a HashMap while someone else is updating it, even with a lock held, can result in a deadlock.  I have seen this happen before on Hadoop.  It is likely to be very rare, but I would rather use transactional memory, aka an AtomicReference, to avoid this entirely.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)