You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by Benjamin Bannier <bb...@apache.org> on 2017/10/17 11:15:01 UTC

Re: Review Request 59987: Added protobuf map support.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/#review188293
-----------------------------------------------------------




3rdparty/stout/include/stout/protobuf.hpp
Line 1 (original), 1 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/#comment265296>

    We should call out that we have a hard requirement on proto3 now in the `CHANGELOG`.
    
    I believe while we currently bundle protobuf-3.3.0 we do not depend on any proto3 features, and users might still use an unbundled protobuf-2.6.1 or similar (e.g., distro packages). With this change such a setup needs to be updated.


- Benjamin Bannier


On July 4, 2017, 4:43 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 4, 2017, 4:43 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Zhitao Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7656
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7656
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Map is a feature of proto2 syntax, but it can only be compiled
> with proto3 compiler, see the following discussion for details:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/protobuf/p4WxcplrlA4
> We have already upgraded the compiler from 2.6.1 to 3.3.0 in
> MESOS-7228, however, to use protobuf map in Mesos code, we also
> need to add the protobuf map support to the code in Mesos for
> converting protobuf message to JSON object and parsing JSON
> object as protobuf message, that is what I have done in this patch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/protobuf.hpp 15690b66cc4ae0c1bf2c2176d73c385ca75d3c20 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Zhang
> 
>


Re: Review Request 59987: Added protobuf map support.

Posted by Qian Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>.

> On Oct. 17, 2017, 7:15 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/protobuf.hpp
> > Line 1 (original), 1 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/diff/2/?file=1768786#file1768786line1>
> >
> >     We should call out that we have a hard requirement on proto3 now in the `CHANGELOG`.
> >     
> >     I believe while we currently bundle protobuf-3.3.0 we do not depend on any proto3 features, and users might still use an unbundled protobuf-2.6.1 or similar (e.g., distro packages). With this change such a setup needs to be updated.
> 
> Qian Zhang wrote:
>     Good point! I am not sure how many users are using unbundled protobuf-2.6.1 or similar. Do you see it will be a problem if we ask them to update to proto3? Maybe we should ask in user & dev list before merging this patch.

Chun has mentioned it in the CHANGLOG in this patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64823/ , and he also made protobuf version 3+ a hard requirement for building Mesos in this patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64822/ .


- Qian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/#review188293
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 21, 2017, 10:07 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 21, 2017, 10:07 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, Chun-Hung Hsiao, and Zhitao Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7656
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7656
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Map is a feature of proto2 syntax, but it can only be compiled
> with proto3 compiler, see the following discussion for details:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/protobuf/p4WxcplrlA4
> We have already upgraded the compiler from 2.6.1 to 3.3.0 in
> MESOS-7228, however, to use protobuf map in Mesos code, we also
> need to add the protobuf map support to the code in Mesos for
> converting protobuf message to JSON object and parsing JSON
> object as protobuf message, that is what I have done in this patch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/protobuf.hpp baad12648dd78ab72ea4277f4c7f99da16696a40 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Zhang
> 
>


Re: Review Request 59987: Added protobuf map support.

Posted by Qian Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>.

> On Oct. 17, 2017, 7:15 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/protobuf.hpp
> > Line 1 (original), 1 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/diff/2/?file=1768786#file1768786line1>
> >
> >     We should call out that we have a hard requirement on proto3 now in the `CHANGELOG`.
> >     
> >     I believe while we currently bundle protobuf-3.3.0 we do not depend on any proto3 features, and users might still use an unbundled protobuf-2.6.1 or similar (e.g., distro packages). With this change such a setup needs to be updated.

Good point! I am not sure how many users are using unbundled protobuf-2.6.1 or similar. Do you see it will be a problem if we ask them to update to proto3? Maybe we should ask in user & dev list before merging this patch.


- Qian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/#review188293
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 4, 2017, 10:43 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 4, 2017, 10:43 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Zhitao Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7656
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7656
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Map is a feature of proto2 syntax, but it can only be compiled
> with proto3 compiler, see the following discussion for details:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/protobuf/p4WxcplrlA4
> We have already upgraded the compiler from 2.6.1 to 3.3.0 in
> MESOS-7228, however, to use protobuf map in Mesos code, we also
> need to add the protobuf map support to the code in Mesos for
> converting protobuf message to JSON object and parsing JSON
> object as protobuf message, that is what I have done in this patch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/protobuf.hpp 15690b66cc4ae0c1bf2c2176d73c385ca75d3c20 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59987/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Zhang
> 
>