You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Thierry Ygé (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/12/05 17:53:10 UTC

[jira] [Created] (SLING-5352) Make ClientSideTeleporter more efficient by making it compatible with ClassRule annotation

Thierry Ygé created SLING-5352:
----------------------------------

             Summary: Make ClientSideTeleporter more efficient by making it compatible with ClassRule annotation
                 Key: SLING-5352
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5352
             Project: Sling
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Testing
    Affects Versions: JUnit Tests Teleporter 1.0.4
            Reporter: Thierry Ygé
         Attachments: clientsideteleporter_patch.txt

Currently it's not possible to use the TeleporterRule as Rule and ClassRule annotation. 

The idea is that BeforeClass will create the bundle and install it.
AfterClass will uninstall it. This will optimize the processing and avoid a lot of round trip  and waits. It still allow to use it as in the original version with only Rule annotation.

I have made some test , and will attach my suggested solution. It allow to use it as before:
{code}
    @Rule
    public TeleporterRule classRule = TeleporterRule.forClass(SomeMoreTest.class, "Launchpad");
{code}

or as follow with a ClassRule annotation:

{code}
    @ClassRule
    public static TeleporterRule classRule = TeleporterRule.forClass(SomeTest.class, "Launchpad");

    @Rule
    public TeleporterRule teleporterRule = classRule;
{code}

The changes are not so big, it only need a static field to store the bundle  symbolic name value in the case it is used with the ClassRule annotation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)